Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

But where does it say that the driver at rear is at fault.

There is no straight forward law as there are many factors in all collisions.

The law does not exist.

My mate is a cop and has just confirmed by SMS that there is no such law but a set of rules

that must take in all factors of the law.

So you make that what you will but there is still no straight forward rule

stating the driver at rear is at fault.

Dont really want to enter into an argument here but the purpose of the Traffic Rules and accompanying regulations is quite clear

and given the circumstances of this accident if they are reported correct, a Taxi driver drove into the rear of a car which had stopped as lawfully required for a red traffic light, its pretty near inconceivable that any court would find the driver of the vehicle in front, to be in the wrong given these circumstances

I've had years of frontline Police experience, and now work for the Justice Dept and do have some idea of what I'm talking about too.

Your mate is correct that all circumstances have to be looked at but from what I'v read here so far the circumstances are pretty clear

Ok guy,

Went to pick up car this arvo from the panel beater. (5pm)

when i pick up the car, briefly look at the rear section where i got hit, looks okay, everything looks fine around the car.

friend says he want to test drive it, so my friend help me to drove back the car, and i drive my gf's car back to city.

stuck on Kings Way for a while.(6pm)

then went we arv at the car park, i sit in the car and notice a big arse crack (approx 20cm) on the front windscreen... from the bottom right all the way cross the middle. the impact point its below the bonnet so its definitly not sandblast for sure.

my friend say he didnt notice while driving back city as its kinda dark too...

called up the panel beater straight away, but as its almost 7pm so they closed, left voice message on their answer machine...

i am just conerning becauses i didnt notice the crack when i pick up the car at panel shop, until 2 hrs later....again will call them first thing in the morning about this matter....

how likely i would be getting the windscreen replace from them? and is it easy to source it in Melb?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And that's a massive problem, because deadshits will deadshit and give you false details. At least in these days of mobile cameraphones, it is trivial to take photos of any ID they are carrying at the same time as the 300 photo extensive documentation of the state of the vehicles that I recommend even for minor incidents. And you get photos of the person's face, any visible tatoos, etc etc, while you're at it. Then you try to avoid mentioning that you're fully capable of making explosives of various power levels and will wreck their shit if you are forced to hunt them down.
    • No, I don't remember the exact reasoning (was 20 years ago!) but the cops didn't end up supplying it to us either. Actually my mother went through a similar thing recently where she was hit when stationary, flustered and didn't get address (she got plate details, name, phone and insurance company, but not address). Person who hit her blocked her number and their insurance company (naturally) would not provide any details. Her insurance company also required her to pay the at fault premium because she did not have the address, cops did not help as it is a minor civil matter (they said their only course was if the other driver had left the scene of the accident without providing any details). She only ended up getting that refunded because they happened to be insured with Suncorp and she was with APIA so same company owners. For some reason the address is critical in insurance companies recovering money from the at fault party
    • If you're driving something like an R32 through to R34, no chance of meeting Euro4. Euro4 came out in 2006, and car manufacturers back then were complaining how hard it would be to meet those regulations. Not a chance a vehicle 10 years earlier is going to be compliant.
    • I presume it would take more than just slapping a big modern catalyst on the exhaust? It's interesting though, looking at the old sales brochures and listings it does not mention anything about emissions. No one cared.
    • Yeh nice, looks like their part of keep it reet? Will have to swing past. I'd much prefer someone actually look at my car and custom make a part, then get a generic part online and hope it works. 
×
×
  • Create New...