Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok guys, just pulled my turbos off (no jokes pls!!!).. There pretty laggy, I got them with my 26, stated as having STD turbos on it.. so a bit of a win I guess..

CHRA has 14411-06U00, which is apparently r32 gismo turbo's, thus explaining why they're laggy...!

Now the thing I don't understand is the nismo's are meant to have a 0.42 compressor, but these are 0.6 like on the GT/le mans nismo's, but the CHRA doesn't show 14411-rs581 as per the lemans turbos.

Confused.. Any help appreciated, would also like to know their max power and efficiency range.

Also, have stock bottom end, nismo 555cc's, microtech, walbro, etc.. If that helps

Thx, Chris.

Edited by kristafa
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/330745-can-you-name-these-turbos/
Share on other sites

Thanks mate, unfortunately those are the main sources of my confusion.. Why does that chart say my turbos should be .42 compressor when mine are .60?

The gtr.co.uk site doesn't answer that guys first question, ie what are they.

am I just to assume mine are gismo GT/Lemans turbos even tho it doesn't have rs581 on the CHRA?

also before anyone gets in with "these are poor design, 15 years old, bush bearing, etc" I know already, but unfortunately for the old RB, this is what she's stuck with for now haha...!

cheers paul - i've been running these turbos for 6 months on 12psi thinking they're stockies and that my exhaust was restrictive hence the laggyness.. good to know i can start to lean on them a little and start making up for that lag in topend power..

check my dyno sheet on the RB26 upgraded turbo thread - shows power vs RPM

EDIT: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=5112467

i have a less than impressive dump pipe setup which will be sorted before turbos are reinstalled, and wind the boost up to 17 pound or so with the new EBC there should be things happening a little earlier in the rev range.

Edited by kristafa

I've used this link before http://homepage.ntlworld.com/tbroom/Turbos.htm

But it's always been strange to me that all three of the various R34 N1 Turbos only produce 500ps as it says on the chart, I had always thought that there was a turbo that was bigger in the r34 n1 range, around the 600ps mark ?

you mean Nismo R1.. similar to a 34 N1 but flow more i guess:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/NISMO-R1-560HP-BALL...=item2eaec141fd

COMPRESSOR:

- HOUSING: T3 (A/R 0.42)

- WHEEL: T3 (TRIM 55)

BEARING: BALL BEARING

TURBINE:

- HOUSING (NIJIREST): T25 (A/R 0.64)

- WHEEL (INCONEL): GT25 (TRIM 62)

ACTUATOR: REINFORCED SPRING, ADJUSTABLE ROD

MAX. EFFICIENCY: 73%

MAX. AIR PRESSURE RATIO (AT BOOST PRESSURE): 103% (1.35KG/CM2)

DESIGNED OUTPUT: 280PS(X2)

sell them (someone will buy them for sure) and get a pair of brand new ball bearing top notch GT-SS's or garrett equivs

the response you gain will far out weigh the current lag and lag penalty you have. specially on a bog stock 26

wow

ive checked your graph, that is horrible

bog stock BCNR33 on the graph below yours

looks to make its peak boost and torque spike at 113km/h around 4000rpm

vs your stock Nismo R1 or whatever they are which make peak around 5200rpm

thats horrible!!!

does your car have non 4.11 diff gears also ?

check my dyno sheet on the RB26 upgraded turbo thread - shows power vs RPM

EDIT: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=5112467

i have a less than impressive dump pipe setup which will be sorted before turbos are reinstalled, and wind the boost up to 17 pound or so with the new EBC there should be things happening a little earlier in the rev range.

i dont think turning the boost up will help response

but freeing up the exhaust is always a good thing

but again i dont think it will shift the power band that much

your main issue is the housings needs lots of flow to wake up

you need aggressive tune, jungle juice, cam gears, aggressive tune and a good tune

if your timing and tune is anything other than spot on, youll pay for the penalty in poor response as your rears as much larger than stock

i reckon a changeover price to GT-SS or the garrett equivs (as per sig) shouldn't be too bad changeover price

you could probably keep the std dumps and still change the turbo's and come out on top light years ahead (in response)

ie

the change of turbochargers will yield a better response improvement vs changing dumps

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I haven’t taken them out of the cases yet    inside the box is this packaging which is pretty much like a massive blister pack 
    • Purchased a NC MX5 a while ago Basic suspension mods done, BC coils and Whiteline sway bars  New DBA calipers, discs and pads Added some 17 x 8 Konig Decagrams with 215/45 17 PS5's Added some typical NA bolt on's, i.e. full exhaust and intake  Added 0.5ltrs with a MZR2.5 swap, nice bump in torques  Found a detachable hard top which is locked in for a colour match with my local paint shop in Feb 25, this also includes some PDR as it has received a few love taps from parking in the local shops when in the hands of my Minister for War and Finances, me, I park nowhere near other cars and typically park on the street The little thing is awesome, I drive it everywhere, it handles like a dream whether I'm up it or just cruising  But now,  because I'm a idiot, I keep looking at turbo kits....... did I mention I'm a idiot Why is dose so appealing  All of the NA 2.5 glory, well.......until sometime in 2025 anyway....🤪  
    • I would not be surprised if you are the only person on earth that has the interest/desire to do that lol.  The Haltech base map is a really good starting point, the car will fire easily and drive very well, even on mild boost levels. To me, following your advice sounds like some sort of ancient Chinese water torcher lol (this is not an insult Josh, never change <3)
    • Those car show concepts from the 2000's and 2010's like the Floria and IDx were brilliant and should've gone ahead, at least one of them. But neither Honda nor Nissan are thinking about affordable performance any more, which is truly sad.  Even if Toyota's liquid hydrogen ICE development reaches the point where it's commercially viable and the infrastructure to support it, Honda/Nissan would have to wait until Toyota allow fee access to their patents to offer it with any smaller performance models they released to take advantage of it.  
    • A sporty manual RWD coupe with a IL4 Honda engine would only be a good thing I assume we won't see anything released for a few years though, unless informal talks and designs have been going on for a few years,  and due to the current, and future, emmisions and safety requirements, I assume anything "sporty" they would do would be at least some hybrid thingie And hopefully anything they are thinking of has nice lines, without lots of plastic and fake bits hanging off it like that horrendous FK8 that looked like it was designed by a 13 year old The other issue of course in the current market is cost, currently the type R is around $70k, a twin is around $50k Meh, I'm old and grumpy and would rather buy a older model car and waste my coin on that than buying anything currently available new  
×
×
  • Create New...