Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just thought I would add my two cents.

I put my ceffiro in the shop just after purchasing it to have a genuine walbro fitted, which i saw with my own eyes prior to fitment. The mechanic opened the fuel tank to find a shitload of rust, probably because it sat in a holding yard in japan before i got it. So he soured a replacement tank, flushed the lines, replaced the fuel filter and fit the walbro. It ran fine for about 9 months until The car just didn't start one day after i had just driven it into town. The walbro had packed it in. So i pulled it out, got a lift to the workshop where the work was done. They wired it up to a battery both forward and in reverse and nothing happened so it was sent back to USA for replacement and i used a standard R33 pump for the time. A few weeks later it cam back and the guys from walbro said they hooked it up and ran it just fine with no problems at all. So i took it home and fit it up again, test started the car and it ran fine, shut off the car and packed up my tools then hopped in the car to go for a spin. Turn the key and no buzzing noise, no starting, nothing... and i thought "not again". So again i removed it and reinstalled the 33 pump, drove back to the workshop. Again, they sent it back to Walbro USA and this time, about 3 months later, Walbro apologized for the inconvenience and for supplying a faulty pump and replaced it with a new one. I installed the new one, this time with a 30 amp relay as it wasn't done before by the mechanic and it worked fine for about 6 months before it did the same thing. My brother and I both held one wire each on a battery terminal and the other end with our other hand on the fuel pump to test it in both forward and reverse and we both witnessed nothing happening. So i packed it away and put a Bosch 040 in. Now never had a problem, very happy with it. About two weeks later my bro and i pulled the walbro out again to test it out of curiosity, because of what had happened with the first one and to our absolute astonishment it worked. I will keep it as a spare or ornament.

That is my personal experience with walbro. :D

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

They sound like a real lottery. Some people making great power and can't complain (including me) and some just won't touch them...

since I've already bought it and running it, I ain't gonna go switching it out for a bosch. If I got a good one that's up to the task of 300rwkw on e85 then I'm stoked. But I'll always be keeping a very close eye on my wideband when giving it a hard time...

Mine was legit, 6 years ago before all these fakes appeared on the market 270rwkw, that was show over for my Walbro.

13:1 AFR's. Bosch pump change over, 10:1

So now the Walbro just gets used as a lift pump for my surge tank.

The issue with Walbros is pressure, they are FINE for N/A power applications - as boost climbs, so does pressure, flow rate then drops off.

There are graphs around here and on the net of the various comparo's.

If you intend on running more than 240rwkw and 15psi - get a bosch or a similar jap/other more suited pump.

Otherwise just for the above the Walbro item is a cheap and good solution.

i have walbro in gtr making 290rwkw @19psi and when put walbro pump in and wired it up we had to take fuel out as it went rich straightaway, so how did you run power to the walbro, off stock wiring, how do you know they weren't fakes back then were you there we the fakes were made and released

  • 2 weeks later...

Walbro's are a fine pump, deliver more fuel than the Bosch's do. If you talk to an EFI shop they will actually tell you the walbro is better suited to an RB25. Hence why cars making bigger power need to run 2 Bosch's to compensate for the downfall in flow.

I run Walbro's in all my previous cars and have had cars making over 500hp at the treads with no fuel supply issues. I had one in a car for 3 years and sold the car without an issue. As with any brand it is the luck of the draw. You can go buy a $100,000 mercedes and a $10,000 daewoo and you stand the chance that the daewoo will be more reliable. If you google anything you will find people who have had issues with them.

Walbro's are a fine pump, deliver more fuel than the Bosch's do. If you talk to an EFI shop they will actually tell you the walbro is better suited to an RB25. Hence why cars making bigger power need to run 2 Bosch's to compensate for the downfall in flow.

Wut?

1x 044 mounted in tank is good for over 500rwhp..

Wut?

1x 044 mounted in tank is good for over 500rwhp..

Yeah but look at the flow rate as in litres per hour

Bosch Rating: 200 LPH at 72.5 PSI and 13.5 V

Walbro Rating: 255LPH at 40 PSI

So as per all flow rate of most pumps higher the pressure lower the flow

Edit: Specs based on Bosch 040 and Walbro GSS-432

Edited by redevil
Actually more than 215l/hr at 72psi if you are running proper wiring/voltage according to their chart...

Yeah and what does the bosch pump flow at the same voltage?

Apples for apples here.

The 200lph on the bosch pump is at 12v and at 5bar

The 255lph on the walbroken is at 12v but at 3bar

put the Walbroken on 5 bar and its 170-180lph at 12v

crank the bosch up to 14v and it'll be closer to 240lph at 5 bar. The Walbro isn't a bad pump but I'd rather have my fuel pumps piss it in rather than just make it over the line

what's wrong with walbro pumps? well they are not direct fit for starters (no bid deal but worth considering if you're paying someone to install it). they flow far less than most people claim (as explained above) since they quote their flow figures at much lower pressures than anyone else. and they are unreliable pieces of rubbish. go to any big tuner and ask where they keep the bucket of dead walbros. every big tuning shop will have a pile of them in the corner somewhere. real, fake, whatever they have a failure rate that is astronomically higher than any other brand of pump I've seen. maybe that's because they are favoured by tight arses who then tend to skimp on other things too (like proper installation) but whatever the reason they fail at an alarming rate.

ever seen a dead nismo pump? I haven't and I've personally used more than half a dozen on my own cars and sold probably 20 more and seen hundreds more. they cost double a walbro but in my eyes they are more than double as good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
  • Create New...