Jump to content
SAU Community

Extreme Rear Brake Rattles


kymbo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Picked up my new Black R35 GTR 4 weeks ago. There is a constant rattle in the back. When I apply the brakes, the noise goes away.

The dealer said it is normal and because the brake pads are undersized so they will not jam when they expand from heat on track days. Therefore they rattle.

They said all new R35 GTR's are the same. Surely not, every time a friend gets in the car they are amazed at how loud the brakes rattle. Makes the car sound and feel cheap. Not a good thing for a car that costs near $200K.

Other than the brakes, I love the car!

DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW I CAN FIX IT, BECAUSE NISSAN SEEMS TO THINK IT IS OK??????????

IT IS DRIVING ME NUTS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's the pad retainer clips. Is your car 2010 model? One of my friends is getting the HPC to order one from Japan. Check with the HPC first.

Thanks RCCC

It is a 2010 model.

The Nissan guy told me they come with a retainer clip standard?

Who or what is the HPC?

Also, does anybody else suffer this problem?

Many thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rear pad rattle is "normal" however i would never call it "extreme". Just the odd clunk/clank. maybe something else going on if it really is extreme. you could try putting anti-squal (stick-on) shims (rear pads dont have them, whereas fronts do). if you are in sydney i have a bunch of the stick on anti-rattle shims if you want to try those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you'll find as the pad meat gets less and less they cavitate around more

Thanks Guy's!!!!!

With the information you provided, I should be able to get it fixed.

Next!!!!

I am only one week away from my first 2,000K service and have decided that, straight after, I will install the full cat (primary) back 'Willel Racing' Titanium Exhaust system, Cobb access tuner, enlarged cold air tubes kit & filters from the air filter boxes to the engine intake plennum, as well as cold air ram/funnel intakes for cold positive pressure air delivery through to the front of the air filter boxes.

What sort of AWHP gain should I expect to see. Anyone know what sort of 0-100K and 400 mtr gains?

Also, any recommendations or added suggestions on my choices???

Thanks again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Guy's!!!!!

With the information you provided, I should be able to get it fixed.

Next!!!!

I am only one week away from my first 2,000K service and have decided that, straight after, I will install the full cat (primary) back 'Willel Racing' Titanium Exhaust system, Cobb access tuner, enlarged cold air tubes kit & filters from the air filter boxes to the engine intake plennum, as well as cold air ram/funnel intakes for cold positive pressure air delivery through to the front of the air filter boxes.

What sort of AWHP gain should I expect to see. Anyone know what sort of 0-100K and 400 mtr gains?

Also, any recommendations or added suggestions on my choices???

Thanks again.

Based on my experience these changes should see yo achieve btw 340 and 360 atw, and a 0-100 of 3.4seconds (from 3.7). Maybe an 11.3 quarter.

Do the dump pipes and intercooler pipes and boost controller and youll see a reliable 370 -380 (I had actuators too). I can do a reliable 3.0 0- 100, and high ten second quarter mile on standard 98 gas.

If you have bigger future plans, go straight for the 4 inch exhaust system. My HKS midpipe and dump pipes are fore sale shortly otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

2009 spec "return springs" will reduce the rattle, they changed the design on the 2010 car and this is a very common complaint, the design change was to stop rear pad squeal (which wasn't an issue) but made the rattle issue worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks John D!

My Nissan service guy came up with a good fix. He used a bead of brake sealer Around the pad perimeter and it is now perfect. However next service I will add the 09 retainers!

My dealer also fitted a Willall mid pipe for me, what a difference and u win on all fronts, weight, power and sound!

I am looking forward to my first sprint day at QR to try my car out for the first time.

Kymbo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...