Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

allo all,

ok, so I has a long term project. to build a 300km/h+ Skyline.

What I have to work with:

Stock r33 '97 GTST, 98000k. now I think the diff ratio are 4.11 (granted its had the whole rear cradle replaced so I'm not entirely sure whats in it...) <-- any way to find out?

my main question, who makes a/m diff's for these things with tall ratio's? aka 3.9/3.7 ? i'm kinda iffy about getting s/h diff centres, not something I want going crunch...yesh, it won't be much chop on a stock engine, but I'm looking at a rb30/25 with a t04 in the long run as well.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331772-300km/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This is what I did when I wanted taller ratios..

-Sourced a second hand auto S13 complete diff which is 3.9:1 (you need the whole things as the crown wheel has to match the pinion gear)

-Ordered a Nismo 2-way

-Gave S13 diff and 2-way centre to my diff guy to set up

-Collect new diff

-Put car on hoist and swap complete old diff for complete new diff

I vaguely remember coming across a 3.7:1 diff but can't remember what it was out of.. I recommend doing some searching as I think various ratios and what they came from was discussed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331772-300km/#findComment-5384114
Share on other sites

Is the goal to just see 300 on the speedo/readout or do you want more? If so change the diff and then you don't have to rev the crap out of it

Here's another option to consider, if you're going to get a gearset for the gearbox, get a custom 5th gear made and leave the diff alone.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331772-300km/#findComment-5389374
Share on other sites

From memory a factory GTR ratio (gearbox & diff) will get to just over 300km/h (7500rpm+) provided you have the power to get there of course.

That would then mean, given the ratios are the same in GTS-t, you should be fine.

Nothing would require alterations at all really.

For the 3.7, pretty certain that was from the old Z stuff, but that is longnose R200, not sure of the dramas that might surround that.

Although in this day and age im sure there is someone that probably makes a off-shelf type thing anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331772-300km/#findComment-5398621
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

How about getting a six speed gearbox and fitting all the normal ratios up to fifth that the standard five speed has and then getting a lower ratio gear cut for sixth gear ? Probably around 0.6 ratio. This way you get relitavly normal driving and that way you dont have to change diff ratios.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331772-300km/#findComment-5410856
Share on other sites

From memory a factory GTR ratio (gearbox & diff) will get to just over 300km/h (7500rpm+) provided you have the power to get there of course.

That would then mean, given the ratios are the same in GTS-t, you should be fine.

Nothing would require alterations at all really.

Nah they won't unfortunately Ash, they fall quite short on stock gearing unless revved to 8000+. As Dave says sounds about correct. There was a similar discussion in this thread:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Pr...tr-t331234.html

Edited by PM-R33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331772-300km/#findComment-5410871
Share on other sites

Nah they won't unfortunately Ash, they fall quite short on stock gearing unless revved to 8000+. As Dave says sounds about correct. There was a similar discussion in this thread:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Pr...tr-t331234.html

lol, reads more like theorising as well ;)

Perhaps the car im thinking off had a different gearset.

I'll have to dig up some info - this is going back quite a while.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331772-300km/#findComment-5414031
Share on other sites

Lol I had some estimates to back up my claims ;)

From a bit of quick math with a Nissan Skyline 5th gear ratio of 0.75 and a final drive ratio of 4.111 and a common set of tyres such as 255/35/18 used, you would need approximately 8000rpm to hit 300km/h. 7500rpm would only give around 288km/h.

Where as a R34 GTR on same tyres revving to 8000rpm would hit around 340km/h due to its 6th gear ratio of 0.79 and final drive ratio of 3.55:1.

However this is only theoretical :down:

Edited by PM-R33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331772-300km/#findComment-5414052
Share on other sites

farout where do u plan to go 300km? you doin a trip to the salt lakes?

trouble with the salt lakes it the 70km of shitty dirt road you have to cross.

Here's an idea...

Get a couple of mates who wanna do it too.

Find a nice quiet 3km straight stretch of road in the country with no houses around and good phone coverage.

Go out with 3 cars and phones. Scope the straight then put a car 2-3 km's past the start and finish.

Wait for the all clear...

Go for it. ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331772-300km/#findComment-5414326
Share on other sites

Speaking completely hypothetically, to achieve 300km/h you really don't need that long of a stretch of road. Numerous highways in Australia would EASILY accomodate for such a speed and im sure have. Shame it is illegal to do so though and therefore should not be done.

But yeah 431km/h with that Veyron was insane!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331772-300km/#findComment-5416648
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Cool to see you're on the forum man, think you've met my twin brother a few times (Brent).
    • Yeah...but NA Mercedes V12.
    • Yeah everyone always seems to refer to them as S13 wheels however they came on R32 Skyline, A31 Cefiro, C33 Laurel etc., and also came polished diamond cut or painted depending on the model. Congrats on your GTS purchase! I'd personally leave it NA.
    • In this thing about this 100% renewal energy stuff I hear no one really talking about anything other than power and fuel really Power and fuel, whilst being a huge part of how we use the billion year old Dinosaur juices, are only 2, of the probably thousands of things that we need to use it for in the chemicals industries for making nearly everything we use nowadays I'm all for a clean planet, but if we want to continue to have all the day to day appliances and stuff that we rely on everyday we will still need fossil fuels Whilst I do love science, and how it can bring innovation, there's really a limit to how far it can go in relation to "going green" As for EV's, unless your charging of your own solar panels, it isn't helping the environment when you consider the the batteries, the mining processes required,  the manufacturing process required, and how long a batteries (read: the vehicle) lasts long term If I was supreme dictator of the world, I would ban the use of sugar for fizzy drinks and food additives and use that for ethanol manufacturing, petrol engines would be happier, and people would be alot healthier  Disclaimer: Whiskey manufacturing would still be required, so says the supreme dictator of the world Same same for all the vegetable oils that get pumped into all our food, use that for bio diesel Disclaimer: the supreme dictator would still require olive oil to dip his bread in This would take some of heat off the use of the use of fossil fuels which are required for everything we use, unless you want to go back to pre 1800 for heat and power, or the early 1900's for plastics and every thing else that has come from cracking ethylene  Would I be a fair and just dictator, nope, and I would probably be assassinated within my first few months, but would my cunning plan work, maybe, for a while, maybe not Meh, in the end in an over opinionated mildly educated arsehole typing out my vomit on my mobile phone, which wouldn't be possible without fossil fuels And if your into conspiracies, we only need the fossil fuels to last until a meteor hits, or thermonuclear annihilation, that would definitely fix our need for fossil fuels for manufacturing and power issues for quite some time  Meh, time for this boomer to cook his lunch on his electric stove and then maybe go for a drive in my petrol car, for fun    
    • It really helps that light duty vehicles have absolutely appalling average efficiency due to poor average load. Like 25% average brake thermal efficiency when peak is somewhere around 38% these days. So even a 60% BTE stationary natural gas plant + transmission and charging losses still doing much better with an EV than conventional ICE. And that's before we get into renewables or "low carbon nonrenewable" nuclear which makes it a no-brainer, basically. In commercial aircraft or heavy duty diesel pulling some ridiculous amount of weight across a continent the numbers are much more difficult to make work. I honestly think in 5-10 years we will still be seeing something like the Achates opposed piston diesels in most semi trucks running on a blend of renewable/biodiesel. Applications where the energy density of diesel is just too critical to compromise. CARB is running trials of those engines right now to evaluate in real world drayage ops, probably because they're noticing that the numbers just don't work for electrification unless our plan is to make glorified electric trains with high voltage wires running along every major highway and only a token amount of battery to make it 30 miles or something like that after detaching. Transport emissions is not insignificant especially in the US, but yes there's a lot of industrial processes that also need to be decarbonized. I agree the scale of the problem is pretty insane but EDF managed to generate ~360 TWh from their nuclear reactors last year and this is with decades of underinvestment after the initial big push in the 70s and 80s. I don't think the frame of reference should be solar-limited. France is not exactly a big country either. Maybe it doesn't work everywhere, but it doesn't have to either. We just can't live off of fracking forever and expect things to be ok.
×
×
  • Create New...