Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all. Just like to ask a silly question. What do you guys mean by a low boost and high boost? Does it refer to boost at low and high rpm respectively or something else? Sorry for the question. First time dealing with a turbo car and in the early learning stages.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/332580-low-boost-high-boost/
Share on other sites

Hi all. Just like to ask a silly question. What do you guys mean by a low boost and high boost? Does it refer to boost at low and high rpm respectively or something else? Sorry for the question. First time dealing with a turbo car and in the early learning stages.

i take it you own a r33?? your car has 2 boost settings, when your under 3000rpm (i cant remember the exact point) it runs at 5psi, when your past 3000rpm it then runs at 7 psi. there is a common and easy mod to earth your boost solenoid so you run high boost all the time.

4500rpm is the point :worship:

Or people have dual stage boost controllers that allow 2 boost levels at the flick of a switch

Or electronic boost controllers (Some) have multiple boost settings, scramble boost (higher boost at the push of a button) etc

Just different levels of Boost

some cars have two stage boost settings, these are usually referred to as low and high

some are RPM controlled, like in the R33 GTST it runs 5psi (known as low) from 0 to 4500rpm and 7psi (known as high) from 4500rpm to 7000rpm

some have different turbocharger modes or stages - the like the subaru B4 which has a small turbo and a larger turbo which have a changeover around 4400rpm (boost changes as well)

some cars have (aftermarket) boost contollers which let the driver set boost to whatever they like

and often they tune the car for a low boost setting which is safe ie lets say 14psi and have a "high" switch for 18psi

so the driver if he feels like he needs more power or boost can turn the controller to high and get more boost/power

often the high is usaully well over the safe limit and can result in failure

the response i have for high and low is tune and setup your car for the highest safe pressure you can run and control it with the accel pedal

ie having 14 and 18psi is pointless. if your can safely run 18psi, then run it all time and set it up and drive it properly

often you'll hear vl turbo's run xyz PSI and have a magic switch for 22psi etc blah blah

its the same deal, just an electronic controller. if he can safely run 22psi, why not just run it all the time

and there's another "full boost" term which is what most people say the RPM at which the turbo reaches target boost pressure

ie on a skyline if it runs 14psi, the guy will say it reaches full boost at 3500rpm

they mean, it can wind up 14psi by 3500rpm - so they mean the lowest possible engine RPM that reaches target boost

this is subjective to a billion things such as car, engine, turbo, tune, mods etc so its pointless

you might hear guys go

my vl turbo reaches full boost at 2500rpm

it means nothing until you get the facts of....

my vl turbo reaches full boost at 2500rpm

with single overhead cam, std pistons, std diff gears, t04e highflowed, 15psi target, 17" wheels, tune is spot on, larger cams, good intake, good intercooler

Low boost is handy for wet greasy days - otherwise run high boost all the time. Running high boost doesn't mean a thing unless you are boosting. That is, if you are cruising at say 80km/h in 5th then you are not boosting at all so it will make no difference what your boost setting is. Shift bck to third and floor the accelerator and you will be boosting hard, you would generally want all your boost so leave it set at high. On wet greasy days have a low boost setting of say 10psi so that your boost comes on much gentler and doesn't peak hard, you will not spin the wheels as easily and you can drive with more control - whats the use of having high boost and watching all that power go to waste anyway.

BTW your fuel economy will not change much at all unless you are boosting all the time. When you are cruising as above, you are really driving an in line 2.5 litre six and will achieve a fuel economy that reflects this. Of cuase if you boost you will increase fuel consumption proportionally.

Wow... great deal of info. Gives me a good starting point to continue learning more about turbo cars. R3N3, you're right. Mine's a S1 R33. Car's running on stock boost currently, but not intending to do any mods until I can understand more. Thanks, paulr33. You do know your stuff.

Another question. If I were to set it up to run at high boost all the time, does it mean that I will run at 7psi whether below or above 4500rpm?

yes if you do the std solenoid trick you run 7psi all the time, but that's only when you load the engine up

ie if you plod around in 2nd gear you boost will be -500mmhg which is no boost at all

its only when you load the engine up, the turbocharger builds up speed (the zzzzt noise) and starts to add boost pressure

this is where the guage goes from -500mmhg to 0 and then into the positive +5 boost area - +5 is +500mmhg which is 9psi

so its only until you load the engine up, that the turbocharger starts to build up and "add" boost

so with std setup if you floor it in 2nd gear it goes from -500mmhg to 0 and then to 5psi and stays there until 4500rpm

then just after 4500rpm the solenoid flicks closed and you bleed an extra 2psi so you run 7psi

My boost gauge is similar to the one in the attached image. So I reckon that I'm safe to say that once the needle passes 0, the turbo is boosting up while anywhere before the 0 mark would be a normal vacuum reading?

My boost gauge is similar to the one in the attached image. So I reckon that I'm safe to say that once the needle passes 0, the turbo is boosting up while anywhere before the 0 mark would be a normal vacuum reading?

post-73541-1281529912_thumb.jpg

My boost gauge is similar to the one in the attached image. So I reckon that I'm safe to say that once the needle passes 0, the turbo is boosting up while anywhere before the 0 mark would be a normal vacuum reading?

yeah thats correct. also once you start doing mods ie. intercooler and exhaust, youll find the boost will increase by itself, because the turbo can flow more freely. while your running your car in stock form you may aswell do the high-boost mod, i did that to mine when i first got it, theres quite a difference that 2 psi makes! and if you get an electronic boost controller do not go above 12psi as your turbo will commit suicide (thats only the stock turbo).

also keep reading on here if you want to learn, its a very good resource :D

yeah thats correct. also once you start doing mods ie. intercooler and exhaust, youll find the boost will increase by itself, because the turbo can flow more freely. while your running your car in stock form you may aswell do the high-boost mod, i did that to mine when i first got it, theres quite a difference that 2 psi makes! and if you get an electronic boost controller do not go above 12psi as your turbo will commit suicide (thats only the stock turbo).

also keep reading on here if you want to learn, its a very good resource :)

I might be talking well over my head about the free boost mod... but wouldn't changing the boost solenoid to run at 7 down low need also to be tuned with the right amount of fuel aswell? Or does the computer adjust the right mixes of fuel so that an imbalance won't damage the engine?

cheers

yeah thats correct. also once you start doing mods ie. intercooler and exhaust, youll find the boost will increase by itself, because the turbo can flow more freely. while your running your car in stock form you may aswell do the high-boost mod, i did that to mine when i first got it, theres quite a difference that 2 psi makes! and if you get an electronic boost controller do not go above 12psi as your turbo will commit suicide (thats only the stock turbo).

also keep reading on here if you want to learn, its a very good resource :)

correction, 12psi is safe, 14 is when you run into issues, that being said, 12psi on stock setup will have so much r&r (rich and retard (over fueling)) that theres no point. 10 psi everyone wins.

if you do the 7psi boost solenoid mod then the AIRFLOW meter will tell the ECU more air is coming in and it will compensate accordingly

ie; it is an EFI system, so you can just dial in more pressure, and it will compensate accordingly

no carby screws to adjust :-)

if you do the 7psi boost solenoid mod then the AIRFLOW meter will tell the ECU more air is coming in and it will compensate accordingly

ie; it is an EFI system, so you can just dial in more pressure, and it will compensate accordingly

no carby screws to adjust :-)

Oh ok, so if i wanted to up the boost one day to 10psi then all I would really need is a boost controller instead of taking it to a tuner.

Looks like I'll have to rip the stock exhaust out and put back the bigger one that came with the car. Has a massive 5 inch tip (not sure about the catback size), but thought of keeping the stock on in case cops try to be funny and pull me over for doing 55 on a 60 limit road.

Thanks for the info!

yeah thats correct. also once you start doing mods ie. intercooler and exhaust, youll find the boost will increase by itself, because the turbo can flow more freely. while your running your car in stock form you may aswell do the high-boost mod, i did that to mine when i first got it, theres quite a difference that 2 psi makes! and if you get an electronic boost controller do not go above 12psi as your turbo will commit suicide (thats only the stock turbo).

also keep reading on here if you want to learn, its a very good resource :P

yes if you want to run more boost than what the acuator gives you need a controller

a controller basically fakes the pressure signal to the actuator so that it doesnt open

a bit like the old FakeCD for win98

in front of the controller is say 3psi and the controller lies to the actuator and says hey theres only 6psi dont open yet

in front of the controller is say 7psi and the controller lies to the actuator and says hey theres only 6psi dont open yet

in front of the controller is say 9psi and the controller lies to the actuator and says hey theres only 6psi dont open yet

in front of the controller is say 10psi and the controller lies to the actuator and says hey theres only 7psi open now

yes if you want to run more boost than what the acuator gives you need a controller

a controller basically fakes the pressure signal to the actuator so that it doesnt open

a bit like the old FakeCD for win98

in front of the controller is say 3psi and the controller lies to the actuator and says hey theres only 6psi dont open yet

in front of the controller is say 7psi and the controller lies to the actuator and says hey theres only 6psi dont open yet

in front of the controller is say 9psi and the controller lies to the actuator and says hey theres only 6psi dont open yet

in front of the controller is say 10psi and the controller lies to the actuator and says hey theres only 7psi open now

What does the actuator do? Can't get a clear explanation from google.

What does the actuator do? Can't get a clear explanation from google.

the actuator is the small can lookin item that sits next to the turbo (only on internal waste-gate turbos). the actuator is connected to the wastegate flap. if you discoonect the solenoid on your car and run it to the line directly to the waste gate (dont do this, just an eg.), your wastegate will open at 5psi. this is because your wastegate is only rated to 5psi, thus opening when there is 5psi boost. some cars running aftermarket internal wastegate turbos might have say a 18psi wastegate, which will open the wastegate at 18psi. a boost controller bleeds off pressure to the wastegate, effectively tricking the wastegate. this is why when you have a boost controller you can increase you boost pressure above the rating of the wastegate but you cant go below the rating of the actuator.

hope i didnt confuse you

Edited by R3N3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok now I’m extremely jealous 
    • Exactly, when searching online they were a lot more common on S13s, but have seen quite a few of Skyline GTSs with them as well.
    • Thanks for the feedback!   “Hard to say what the extra connector is, it looks a bit like a coax type connector, so possibly a separate radio/GPS antenna, or even another camera input?  The V37 series (including the Q50), did go through a model refresh in 2020, since Australia didn't get any Q50s newer than 2019, we didn't get any of the refreshed models, so there could also be other unexpected problems to overcome to swap an older Q50 head unit into a new model V37.” I wonder if the extra plug out has anything to do with the factory optioned drive recorder, or traffic updates. It looks like these systems link to the main screens too, and probably rv37 specific over Q50 perhaps?   “Regarding the TV standards, I assume you are referring to the AV inputs?  I haven't ever tried to use them, Japan used a slightly modified version of the US NTSC system, and Australia uses PAL for composite video, that said, I wouldn't be surprised if a video input could work with either system.  That is mostly irrelevant here though, unless you plan to use those inputs for something?” The car has a Japanese TV in it already. For compliance it will be disconnected I think.  From what I read it only works when the handbrake is engaged anyways, but an aftermarket module can be installed for use with handbrake not applied. I was more so curious if there was a way to convert the NTSC to PAL for Australian operation. (I don’t need it but it’s cool to have the gadgets working) I have a BNR34 MFD I converted years ago to take PAL signal in my skyline and I linked it to the DVD Head unit for dual screen use. There was some write up on SAU back in the day how to do it and I can’t remember what was involved. So sorta curious what can be done here etc.  “So, Pac posted in the other thread about a box that plugs into the USB C and gives you full Android OS to run whatever modern/connected nav you want on the top screen, and it still automatically switches back to function” The Rv37 model comes with Apple play and Android, I think the Q50 doesn’t? so for me I can simply plug my phone into the usb or maybe blue tooth and that will become it’s own Nav that way independent  I’m happy for this option but again figured if there was a factory module can it be used or updated.  It had SD card slot for map updates so I could update it if I can get AUS specific maps on it,   That alibaba screen does look neat.  I’m not ready to bust a move just yet on it or something like to as my car can take my Apple iPhone already.  Also it doesn’t say it suits current model Rv37 skylines but the Q50, so perhaps it may not be skyline compatible.  I’d love to see one installed to know first hand or even see one in Q50 and hear some feedback, is it cheap Chinese junk!? Is it good? Does it suit RHD? Is it internet compatible like a normal tablet, and will it support all rv37 specific options like map zoom and steering wheel control and Bose system and so on.. I’m certainly intrigued and interested       I’ve done some digging around.; my local Nissan has a tech guy ex Infiniti and he wants to try trick the nav unit into think it’s q50 so it takes Aussie software or something,  When it arrives I will take it there and see what he can do.    Also seems we no longer have Nissan connect app available in Australia now. I’ve read my dealer books etc at home and it seems in Japan via that app you can purchase internet plans for the rv37 skyline to work through the screens inside. it seems that you can get traffic updates, it links to ETC, and I believe the in car specific recorders. This video then is all stored and visible via app. the Nissan connect app can also be used for remotely starting and controlling heaters etc from afar. Seems tv was also part of this. I’ll have a further look and play when it arrives. (I wonder if I can somehow get the Japan version of Nissan connect on my phone and use the remote start features etc) App Store won’t allow it as region specific- need configure that one   rv37 has multiple security options and packages.  Premium package comes with tilt sensor, remote and battery in siren, and can be bundled with auto mirror retract when locked, door jam illumination when opened on drivers side only, and also remote start.  Otherwise all modules can be purchased separately and still applied but easier to do as a whole and bundle for shared hardware and looms. (This is where Nissan Japan have advised the security part needs a dealer device to set up). Australia dealers have advised me Australian delivered models weren’t offered factory optioned  security systems so they don’t really know what’s entailed and what device.  Nissan Japan state that the other components like mirror retract and door lighting and remote start should still work on that package even if security doesn’t (however security still may).  I’m tempted to purchase and take the risk on this. There’s a possibility it can be made to work by piggybacking off signals etc instead too.     im curious if any Q50 owners have a factory optioned security system with these options or just a factory optioned system. If so I’d imagine the same device or process for installation should be needed meaning someone with Q50 dealer Experience may know. (Waiting on my local tech to get back to quiz further here prior to ordering)   and like q50 some of the v37 models have the scuff panel illumination and the footwel illumination too.  I see 400R wasn’t compatible according to Nissan diagrams.  I’m guessing it didn’t have a plug out for this. Would be a nice addition… I wonder if anyone has this in a rv37 or q50 and has a wiring diagram or booklet for installation to know where to piggyback the system too.  Seems to activated by door opening, so if imagine it would grab a door ajar signal and 12v and earth and probably ignition, but curious to know more as it’s pretty much the only factory option the 400R doesn’t take.     Thanks for your inputs. I’m finding so little information rv37 skyline specific as apposed to Q50 so trying to pioneer forwards and see can and can’t work and what options are there to help.  I’ll keep updated when the car is landed and ready to play with on these things in the hope it helps others and my journey can assist.  Appreciate any input and help.  Cheers 
    • Nah, if I need to fit people in a car I'll just use the Mrs car, the MX5 is perfect for what I need as a fun little sports car for fun on the street As for getting in and out of the MX5, I have no issues as I am a short arse who does lots of mobility training 🥷 If anything, I have been looking at Daihatsu Hi-Jets for a work hack, I helped one of my mates move some stuff with one recently that he picked up from Just Jap, it was a little ripper and plenty big enough for what we needed, it would also be super handy for me as I do alot of gardening, and plan on having some veggie patches and native gardens in the place I buy next year when I retire I did alot landscape gardening and growing veggies prior to my current job, and loved it, and that is a hobby that can keep me sane in my retirement, and as such, the little 300kg load capacity would be more than enough for what I need it to move around I have been looking at utes for just this purpose for a while now, and a near new 2024 Hi-Jet can be had for under $30k And I would rather look at a quirky little Hi-Jet than pretty much any other little ute, well, apart from a Brumby, I love the little Brumby, and weirdly have never owned one yet I was going to buy a heap of raffle tickets to try and win the Brumby that MCM built for Subaru Australia, but sadly I totally missed the raffle, I even filled in some form to be told when the raffle started so I could buy tickets, but to my dismay I was never contacted and found out I missed it when I was randomly googling Brumbys last year... #conspiracy  Maybe I should just buy a Brumby for a little "work hack".....LOL I use to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure
    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
×
×
  • Create New...