Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

We put on my "bolt-on" hks2530 turbo and, well, the stock lines don't match up. Because we would have needed a fitting for the closest water line and a T-piece for the one around the back we just cut the metal lines and attached some 5/16" fuel hose which fitted nice and tight. The braided oil line was just looped back around to the block as well.

We think these should be alright but thought it might be wise to double check with people in the know so i don't stuff up my new turbo :D

Turbolines3.JPG

Turbolines4.JPG

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/33267-do-these-turbo-lines-look-ok/
Share on other sites

I think you might find the fuel hoses will not cope with the heat that will come from the turbo.

It should be ok for a sort run up to auto one to get better (heat resistant) hoses.

Just my 2c worth of advice

Mal

Yeah, what Stagea man said :D I had to do something very similar when fitting my new turbo, and the heat of the turbo (and don't forget that two of those lines carry engine oil...) meant that I went for lines meant for an oil cooler. It's reinforced and is designed for exactly what it'll be used for!

Thats a fair bit below the turbo there though.. and its about the same distance to other essential (plastic covered) wiring to the O2 sensor and things.. and also the rubber heater water lines run past the back of the engine, at a similar distance with no dramas. So I think it would be ok, but I'd be keeping a close eye on it.

I would still most definitely be erring on the side of caution - a burst line spraying oil onto the turbo and exhaust manifolding can't be good :D

My main concern would be using fuel line - yes, fuel line sits in some pretty warm spots too, but fuel tends to be far cooler than engine oil, so the design tolerances may not have accounted for high temperatures *inside* the line. I may be completely wrong and fuel line could well be perfectly safe in this application, but unless you're 100% certain, IMHO it's not worth the risk for a combined total of maybe $30 worth of replacement hose.

Just read back over that and tiredness + a few drinks mean that it might come across as aggressive. It's not meant to be, just trying to reinforce the importance of making sure the oil/water supply systems are not skimped on :D Don't want you guys thinking I'm being nasty, lol

Thanks for the help guys. The rubber hoses will carry water, not oil (that's what the braided hose and bottom return line are). I wasn't worried about the heat of the liquid travelling through the hose because at the other end of the closest hose in the top picture there is a rubber hose from factory. I was just worried about heat from the manifold and turbo, but as someone said, there are other rubber and plastic hoses that travel just as close.

edit: oh and that very bottom hose is the same as the stock return pipe so i assumed the rubber section in that would be alright.

We put on my "bolt-on" hks2530 turbo and, well, the stock lines don't match up. Because we would have needed a fitting for the closest water line and a T-piece for the one around the back we just cut the metal lines and attached some 5/16" fuel hose which fitted nice and tight. The braided oil line was just looped back around to the block as well.

We think these should be alright but thought it might be wise to double check with people in the know so i don't stuff up my new turbo :D

Turbolines3.JPG  

Turbolines4.JPG

Get some high temp hose from pirtek just to be sure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...