Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 204
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

mitch noted down some lap times, but the full results are not up that I can see:

chris: 1.37.585

noddy: 1.29.005

me: 1.26.644

stu: 1.22.898

Yes speedy results hey - I think mylaps look after the rules and the tintop trophies.

But must say was a great track - can't wait to have another crack at Irace next year.

Dropped 33 off to Advan on the way home, going link system and some more injectors.

Fuel pump brushes seem to be going fine, they have gotta outlast the OEM ones (4 months)

Bitta bad news with in car only got some practice laps.

Cheers

haha - that's pretty cool Chris!

I'm pretty happy considering I had no gear for the two low-80kph corners, Turn 2 and the T-Junction (AKA Stupid). 2nd was a bit too short, 3rd was a bit to tall. Did 1:28.1's either way. Stupid standard diff! That's the best excuse I can come up with anyway :thumbsup:

mylaps is officially ghey. just spent 10 minutes putting this together so we can see what car belongs to the name

1 GEOFF NOBLE 1:20.394 Lotus Elise

2 BRUCE McPHAIL 1:22.025 CRD F2

3 MATT CAMPBELL 1:22.765 Welsor Clubman

4 STUART INWOOD 1:22.898 Nissan GTR R33

5 MICK CULLUM 1:24.302 sr20det mx5

6 GARY THORN 1:25.799 Birkin S3 Clubman

7 DUNCAN HANDLEY 1:26.644 Nissan GTR R32

8 PETER BROWN 1:26.664 Icon

9 CAMPBELL WILSON 1:26.781 MNR Vortx

10 RAMA HIGGINS 1:27.321 BMW 323i

11 CALLUM WHATMORE 1:27.395 Nissan Sil80

12 DARRIN SIDDINS 1:27.420 Ford Escort

13 STEVEN LACEY 1:27.676 Holden Torana SS

14 MORRIE HOOK 1:27.850 Datsun 1600

15 PAUL ANSELL 1:28.090 Mitsubishi Evo VI

16 HARRY DOLING 1:28.107 Nissan 180SX

17 ERIC SCHEEREN 1:28.153 Arrow Sei

18 FRANK MARSHALL 1:28.194 ASP 330

19 IAN DIVEN 1:28.561 Arrow Sei

20 STUART BORROWS 1:29.005 R33 GTST

21 ROB NEAL 1:29.512 BMW E30

22 JAMES BRICKWOOD 1:29.578 VK

23 BRIAN DUNN 1:29.889 westfield se

24 ROGER RANFTL 1:30.701 Holden Commodore

25 JACK NOWOTORSKI 1:30.846 Subaru Sti

26 ASHLEY HEFFERNAN 1:31.053 Holden Torana XU1

27 CHRIS RICHARDS 1:31.157 260z

28 JOHN WOOLCOCK 1:31.199 mx5

29 GARRY PITT 1:31.472 elise

30 GRAHAM BOHM 1:31.703 mits mirage

31 PETER McCLOY 1:31.777 evo 9

32 ALAN EVANS 1:32.090 Ford Mustang

33 ANDREW McMASTER 1:32.246 BMW 323i

34 JAMIE HEFFERNAN 1:32.382 Holden Torana XU1

35 BOB WELSH 1:32.468 Datsun 1600

36 MARK HYDE 1:32.650 Ford Escort

37 ANDREW CHERNI 1:32.698 Datsun 1200

38 JIM BRICKWOOD 1:32.925 Holden Commodore VK

39 MIKE McKELLIGET 1:33.026 Datsun 260Z

40 DAN O'MARA 1:33.099 Datsun 1200

41 GARY MICHAEL 1:33.262 Holden Torana XU1

42 PETER COULTER 1:33.689 FPV Pursuit ute

43 SARA COUPER 1:33.978 Toyota Celica

44 DAVID MARTIN 1:34.620 Mitsubishi Evo IX

45 YVE STOCKS 1:34.650 DRB Cobra

46 LINDSAY BURKE 1:34.816 Mazda RX7

47 JASON O'MEARA 1:34.906 Honda Civic

48 ROBIN EVANS 1:35.828 Datsun 260Z

49 CHRIS MUIR 1:35.993 Honda Civic

50 PETER HERLIHEN 1:36.086 Ford Laser

51 LISLE NEUMANN 1:36.168 Datsun 1600

52 GARRY O'HALLORAN 1:36.260 Holden FE

53 MICHAEL MUIR 1:36.649 Honda Civic

54 DARRYL BENDER 1:36.714 Ford Capri

55 SCOTT FORREST 1:36.797 Ford Laser

56 LAURIE ELLIS 1:36.846 Welsor

57 KEVIN ADDISON 1:36.910 Mazda MX5

58 MARK MANTEUFEL 1:37.011 Holden Commodore

59 MICHAEL HICKS 1:37.069 Mazda MX5

60 OWEN GORTON 1:37.163 Ford Falcon XY GTHO

61 STEPHEN WILKINS 1:37.248 PDR

62 CHRIS QUICK 1:37.585 Mazda MX5

63 JOHN FLYNN 1:37.814 Lotus Elise

64 DOUG SWAN 1:37.894 Toyota MR2

65 PETER WYNN 1:39.734 Ford Escort

66 KIEREN LOCKE 1:39.812 Datsun Sunny

67 LUKE HAIN 1:40.459 Datsun Sunny

68 KERRY REDFERN 1:41.485 Honda Civic

69 BOB STEWART 1:41.927 Ford Cortina

70 ALEX SLACK 1:42.626 Toyota MR2

71 PAT DEVINE 1:44.484 Morris Mini

72 ROBERT KAI 1:45.045 Mazda RX7

73 ROBERT MUIR 1:45.595 Honda Civic

Edited by scooby36
  • 4 weeks later...

pics finally made it (by far the most expensive I have ever bought from a track day). OK pics although they don't really show the background much, could have been anywhere.

I've narrowed down when I scraped the wall....sometime between 10am....

MP-10am-no-scratches.jpg

and 2pm....

MP-2pm-scratches.jpg

in any case, I was taking it easy on saturday,

MP-easy-sat1.jpg

MP-easy-sat2.jpg

MP-easy-sat3.jpg

before finally having a go on sunday

MP-easy-sun1.jpg

MP-easy-sun2.jpg

No trophy, but it was a good fun event :D

Interesting pics tiger,,,looks like the right rear tyre is trying it's hardest to escape the rim. Nice work smashing those poor defencless ripple strips by the way,,,I'm proud of you.

Cheers

yeah, the tight bugger is charging $20 for proof sheets! That $20 is taken off the cost of any subsequent order. Eg a CD with all pics of your car from the event plus one 8x12" print as I've ordered is $85. He had 38 shots of my car from 4 different locations on the track - under the bridge, Siberia, Tee Junction (now aka Stupid) and the esses. The way he justified it was that many people just want to see how thier car looks on the track and don't order anything. So this way he at least gets a nominal fee for his work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yes, it is entirely possible to twincharge a Skyline. It is not....without problems though. There was a guy did it to an SOHC RB30 (and I think maybe it became or already was a 25/30) in a VL Commode. It was a monster. The idea is that you can run both compressors at relatively low pressure ratios, yet still end up with a quite large total pressure ratio because they multiply, not add, boost levels. So, if the blower is spun to give a 1.4:1 PR (ie, it would make ~40 kPa of boost on its own) and the turbo is set up to give a 1.4:1 PR also, then you don't get 40+40 = 80 kPa of boost, you get 1.4*1.4, which is pretty close to 100 kPa of boost. It's free real estate! This only gets better as the PRs increase. If both are set up to yield about 1.7 PR, which is only about 70 kPa or 10ish psi of boost each, you actually end up with about 1.9 bar of boost! So, inevitably it was a bit of a monster. The blower is set up as the 2nd compressor, closest to the motor, because it is a positive displacement unit, so to get the benefit of putting it in series with another compressor, it has to go second. If you put it first, it has to be bigger, because it will be breathing air at atmospheric pressure. The turbo's compressor ends up needing to be a lot larger than you'd expect, and optimised to be efficient at large mass flows and low PRs. The turbo's exhaust side needs to be quite relaxed, because it's not trying to provide the power to produce all the boost, and it has to handle ALL the exhaust flow. I think you need a much bigger wastegate than you might expect. Certainly bigger than for an engine just making the same power level turbo only. The blower effectively multiplies the base engine size. So if you put a 1.7 PR blower on a 2.5L Skyline, it's like turboing a 4.2L engine. Easy to make massive power. Plus, because the engine is blown, the blower makes boost before the turbo can even think about making boost, so it's like having that 4.2L engine all the way from idle. Fattens the torque delivery up massively. But, there are downsides. The first is trying to work out how to size the turbo according to the above. The second is that you pretty much have to give up on aircon. There's not enough space to mount everything you need. You might be able to go elec power steering pump, hidden away somewhere. but it would still be a struggle to get both the AC and the blower on the same side of the engine. Then, you have to ponder whether you want to truly intercool the thing. Ideally you would put a cooler between the turbo and the blower, so as to drop the heat out of it and gain even more benefit from the blower's positive displacement nature. But that would really need to be a water to air core, because you're never going to find enough room to run 2 sets of boost pipes out to air to air cores in the front of the car. But you still need to aftercool after the blower, because both these compressors will add a lot of heat, and you wil have the same temperature (more or less) as if you produced all that boost with a single stage, and no one in their right mind would try to run a petrol engine on high boost without a cooler (unless not using petrol, which we shall ignore for the moment). I'm of the opinnion that 2x water to air cores in the bay and 2x HXs out the front is probably the only sensible way to avoid wasting a lot of room trying to fit in long runs of boost pipe. But the struggle to locate everything in the limited space available would still be a pretty bad optimisation problem. If it was an OEM, they'd throw 20 engineers at it for a year and let them test out 30 ideas before deciding on the best layout. And they'd have the freedom to develop bespoke castings and the like, for manifolds, housings, connecting pipes to/from compressors and cores. A single person in a garage can either have one shot at it and live with the result, or spend 5 years trying to get it right.
    • Good to know, thank you!
    • It's a place for non car talk. There's whoretown which is general shit talking. But also other threads coving all sorts of stuff(a lot still semi car related)
    • Looked it up. It sounds so expensive lmao I'd rather not. Awwwww but I just love that sound
    • If you want the screaming "weeeee" sound, just let the gasket between the exhaust manifold and the turbo break a little. It'll go "weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" everytime its on boost...
×
×
  • Create New...