Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, got this little box with my GTR. Not sure what the hell it actually does, but was told it makes the ATTESSA kick in quicker. The plugs do match up to those on the G sensor, have plugged it in but the AWD like came on so thought i'd better not chance driving it. There's no serial or part numbers on it anywhere, the only thing is 40B on the pcb inside.

post-53780-1282274659_thumb.jpg

post-53780-1282274691_thumb.jpg

post-53780-1282274720_thumb.jpg

post-53780-1282274753_thumb.jpg

post-53780-1282274780_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/333655-kansai-service-mystery-box/
Share on other sites

i'd guess that it's a primitive torque split controller, but instead of it being adjustable it is just an on/off type setup. so it may allow you to toggle between just rwd or normal awd mode. or it may be that it goes from working normally to having the front drive engaged regardless of the g-sensor reading.

You ever heard of HKS Kansai Service?

hks-kansai-gtrworld-001.jpg

HKS Kansai Service is a workshop in Japan as part of the HKS group.

Kansai is also a region in Japan's main island Honshū... Maybe is where HKS Kansai is based..?

It is most probably your TSC but a very old style one as new ones look totally different and with an extra function(s) as pictured below.

nengun-0899-00-hkskansai-active_et-s_controller.jpg

HKS Kansai Service Active ET-S Controller = Active Electronic Torque Split Controller.

Ive got one of these in my gtr , though it dosent have a switch it has a button . what it does is turns the car from AWD to RWD without affecting the ABS like it would when you pull the fuse . I got told to press it while the cars off then switch the car on and the AWD lite should come on (like you said) thats how you now its RWD then turn the car off press the button again turn the car back on and there should be no AWD lite the car is no back to AWD . heres a pic of mine

post-64866-1282393336_thumb.jpg

Edited by nismo32gtr

Thanks yeah does look exactly like mine and after talking it over with a mate he said exactly the same. He also suggested it would be for a 32 GTR instead of a 33 (different G sensor?)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
    • Yes, a plan for non-action is always my first sort of plan! I'm happy to see what falls out of invision's update. I had been having some thoughts on what to do with this the other day and they all seem to have fled my memory, after various solar panel induced traumas, squeaking suspension sphericals, etc etc, over the last little bit. I'll try and recall what I had in mind and make sure that I put it into print in some form before the Alzheimer's strikes again.
    • The ability to have both a 5500 stall for launching, and a regular lockup for every other scenario is pretty sweet. Does it actually work well like that though in the real world? Would it hold up to track use and otherwise you'd never know you had a stall converter in it? If so, that's awesome
×
×
  • Create New...