Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all

Some time ago I posted up looking to see if there were retail options to buy a subframe spacer to insert between the k-frame and the chassis rail in the r32 GTR to drop the motor height relative to anything else. Well there weren't, so I had to improvise.

Now, as everybody knows, the deck height on the rb30 is some 38mm higher than the rb26, so in order to minimise the efforts getting the bonnet to shut, I decided to insert a spacer in between the k-frame and where it bolts to the rails.

Now, dissassembling all the suspension pickup points sounds like a lot of work, but if you have the engine out already chances are you're undone the front hubs to remove the driveshafts, and also the tie rod ends. So really if you can get the ball joint off, then loosen the steering knuckle, that's all that;s really required to drop the k-frame (of course, ensure the car is supported somewhere else than the k-frame - this isn't too difficult with the engine out).

The k-frame is held in by four bolts on each side (total of 8x17mm nuts). You will however need a 17mm deep socket set and extension to remove the nuts. The front set of bolts is actually a removable bracket that slots in through the rail and is visible in the engine bay.

post-45795-1282384654_thumb.jpg

Once you have the k-frame loose, you can have a look at what is required and the constraints.

Ideally, I would have made a spacer that dropped the motor down an inch or even more, to take up most of the difference in the deck height, but the problem is that the two bolts holding in the rear k-frame nuts on each side don't have heaps of spare meat on the threads. Obviously you don't want the k-frame held in with nuts that only have a couple turns on them!

My recommendation is for a spacer 10mm thick. It makes enough of a difference to be worthwhile but still lets the nuts wind on fully to the threads.

In terms of the dimensions of the spacers themselves, the attached pic gives an indication. I made the distance between the holes roughly 50mm and 75mm, but measure it carefully for yourselves. The holes themselves need to be 12mm thick.

I made mine out of 10mm steel plate, which is of course very strong but pretty hard to work with. My mate used an oxy torch to cut it out and then grinded off the edges to make it neat. I used a 12mm high-speed steel drill bit and a centrepunch to make the holes, and they fitted up really neatly with not much lateral movement at all.

Given that the issue is probably crush strength I see no reason why alloy could not be used - it would certainly be much easier to work with. But I figured steel plate is probably more engineer friendly. And in any case once it's painted matt black you really can't see it in the engine bay at all.

post-45795-1282385201_thumb.jpg

Please note that spacing the k-frame down 10mm will not solve all your problems. You will still need to hack, slash, and generally get creative to make that bonnet shut, especially if you are retaining the twin turbo setup.

Also some people on here seem to be lowering their motor by modding the engine mounts - I was not keen to do this because by the time you put a 10mm sump adapter in there, there is very little clearance between the sump and the k-frame and all the power steering stuff, so I didn't want to reduce this clearance even more.

Anyway, that's how I did mine, hope the pics help any fellow DIY'ers visualise what's required.

Great write up!

For future people searching, it may be worth mentioning how much the plates cost to be made up normally :D

Don't get what you mean, N1GTR - "normally"? I couldn't buy them on the internet, and didn't ask any workshops because we used steel plate that was lying around in the shed from another project...

Don't imagine it would be much though?

So we spaced the subframe down, and test fitted the long motor with the timing covers attached. The main problem is the front, top timing belt cover hitting on the bonnet. Now, this was with my old, crappy, saggy engine mounts being used, so I was pretty sure that with brand new, stiff nismo rubbers it would be higher if anything.

I should point out that because the r32 GTR bonnet is alloy, and very thin, it's not really possible to cut and weld it. Even professional panel shops were saying they weren't prepared to do it for fear of blowing through or warping the metal. If anyone knows any different I'd be very interested to know.

Once you have the motor test fitted, you will see that it is obvious there is a rib running down the centre of the bonnet that it hits on. Now, I'm not suggesting that chopping a rib out of the bonnet is legal, however I will point out that this area is completely covered by the underbonnet felt, so it will work as a temporary solution until you can get something better sorted out.

I am currently thinking of getting a GTST bonnet (which, I think, is metal) and modifying that in an engineer-friendly way. But this will work as a short-term proposition.

The ribs arnen't attached to the bonnet in any serious way, so I found it helpful to insert thin wedges of wood between the rib and the bonnet to sit it up slightly, then carefully cut through with an angle grinder. Then I got a file and smoothed off any edges so it wouldn't rub and cut through the felt.

post-45795-1282445496_thumb.jpg

Edited by dorifticon

The other issue is that if you are anything like me, doing a rb30 conversion in your shed will represent a big enough investment of time and money such that you won't want to go changing your turbo setup at the same time. If you are sticking with the OEM-style twin turbo arrangement, the big y-collector on top will be an additional pain in the ass. I got around it by grinding off the alloy boss where the twin turbo sticker sits, and putting washers in the bonnet. Again, quick and dirty but gets the car on the road (and adds that "Drift" look).

If I don't go a big single in the near future, I may see if I can get the flange off the front turbo milled down by 5mm or so to lower the position of the y-pipe.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=5375352

Edited by dorifticon
If I don't go a big single in the near future, I may see if I can get the flange off the front turbo milled down by 5mm or so to lower the position of the y-pipe.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=5375352

how about milling the flange off the twin turbo pipe itself? i might try that myself as i have a replacement twin turbo pipe & would liek to retain the badge/boss if possible

don't forget about the option of spacing the turbos down with spacers between the exhaust manifold and the turbos. drops the whole assembly down and you can use the original hard piping etc. but it does mean taking the turbos off.

i was close to doing this with my setup at the time

sounds like a pain in the ass. id be abit woried for a track car having alterd the roll center down with the subframe.

i totally agree with you, this is why i chose to trim my bonnet bracing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...