Jump to content
SAU Community

S'n'S 2010  

85 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

SAU-Vic Show’n’Shine ‘10

All,

There is a bit of debate going on about location, what works and what does not for members.

So what better way to settle this than a good ole poll?

Now, this aint no election poll - there will be an end result :(

When voting about the two places please consider the following:

Both locations are very central, and open.

Como Park, Richmond (’07 S’n’S was here)

Pro

Come/go as you please during the day

BBQ for members will be provided

Con

Not a lot of public/foot traffic

No major food vendors nearby (stuck with BBQ)

Waterfront City, Docklands (’09 S’n’S was here)

Pro

Lots of public/foot traffic (last year would easily be over 1,000 people)

Plenty of places to eat throughout the day

Con

Set move in/out time

No BBQ lunch

This poll will run for 2 weeks and hopes to workout/finalise the venue based on what members want.

Please indicate your choice inline with the two options provided.

Thanks

Ash

  • 2 weeks later...

Last year IIRC it was 9-9.30am in, 2-3pm out.

It'll be in last years thread (archived events) if you really want to know.

So it's not a epic full day, 6hrs or so.

It does take a while to organise/arrange all the cars etc. Took us a good 45mins from memory.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...