Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Got my car tuned a few days ago and have had a day or two to drive it around and feel the rush of power I was anticipating.

It does go really really good and makes 315kw at the wheels, having never owned a 300kw+ car before I was expecting it to make me feel like the drivers seat was going to snap off, but it's just not floating my boat as much as i thought it would.

So now I don't know whether to chase some bigger numbers or work with what I've got for now.

Spec

Engine is unknown but been told by previous owner its a forged rebuild

N1 turbo's

650cc injectors

2.5" stainless dumps into full 3" exhaust.

Is 350kw going to feel that much better or do ya need to go for the 400kw mark to really feel like the afterburners are firing????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/334210-where-is-the-wow/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What was your previous power level? If you went from say 200awkw to 300+ (measured on the same dyno) you should certainly feel it.. but if you had high 200's already then obviously the difference is less pronounced.

Also, are you getting all those 315kw to the ground alright, how's you traction levels? Perhaps try borrowing a set of semis off someone and see how those feel?

And as the old saying goes, "more power is never enough" :blink:

Try this:

2nd or 3rd gear, cruise up to about 3-4k rpm, then slam your foot right down, floor it, with 315wkw and AWD, if you don't feel the massive pull, then you have problems my friend haha

my car's only got about 200kw at all fours, and if I do the above, it sends me hunting for the other lane, the sudden rush of torque is insane.

I think the problem is your power curve is very progressive, as mentioned the N1 turbos are designed for an almost linear power curve with no lag at all, so you don't feel an aggressive surge of power as most big single GTRs would...

He is in a GTR, there shouldnt be traction problems with 300rwkw!

N1 turbos, if R33/R32 items - laggy POS's for the power they deliver unfortunately, so if thats the case then thats sorted out as to why:)

Put a set of Garrett -9s on there and for the same power, it'll all be all on maybe 1000rpm earlier, even more perhaps.

Also remember GTR's are quite heavy. 280rwkw in my 1450kg car feels similar to a GTR with 330rwkw and what, 1650kg?

When i was coming out of a corner, full throttle from 4000rpm with a sorted 330rwkw in a GTR - certainly some G forces goin on!

The difference is never as big as you'd expect, when i went from 285rwhp to around 440rwhp in my r33 gts-t i thought it would knock my socks off.. was rather disappointed, especially after all the hype you hear about 300rwkw cars. I suppose things never quite live up to the hype. I'm hoping the 500rwhp mark will be a little more exciting.

Jarrod

its the torque that you feel

I would also add that its the 'change in torque' that gives you that holy crap feeling. So a turbo with more lag will have a greater change in torque and give you more of a rush.

Some people like the responsive linear fast track car sort of power and some people like the nothing nothing oh holy crraaaappp feeling. I think its personal and what you use the car for.

I remember someone on this forum posting about going for a ride in the corvette ZR1, he said it felt quick but not mind blowing until he looked down at the speed. A car with constant torque will be very fast and be better at achieving traction but tends to not give that 'rush' feeling.

Bit more than that mate.

Bigger wheels, larger exhausts & so on, passengers, fluids etc.

R33's certainly tip a lot more than 1500kg

From the always perfect wikipedia (all are curb weights):

R32 GTR: 1430kg

R32 GTR V Spec: 1480kg

R33 GTR: 1540kg

R33 GTR V Spec: 1550kg

R34 GTR: 1540kg

R34 GTR V Spec: 1560kg

Interesting topic.

Mine at 262rwkw was a real blast to drive and was like a sling shot when it came on, you really felt that feeling in your pants that the car was flying. Then you get used to it and it doesn't feel fast anymore. Maybe you've built up this image in your head of what to expect which was more than it could give and now the reality is setting in?

its the torque that you feel

I wish people would stop saying things like this, torque and power are directly related, at a given rpm with a given power level, you will always have the same amount of torque and vice versa.

You feel the acceleration, this is caused by power OR torque, they are both the same thing when you are talking about acceleration.

I would also add that its the 'change in torque' that gives you that holy crap feeling. So a turbo with more lag will have a greater change in torque and give you more of a rush.

This is pretty much correct except change in torque is identical to change in power, basically where there is the biggest slope in the dyno graph is where you will feel the biggest punch in your back.

^^^^

yes and no...

Torque is the derivative of power with respect to RPM. I.e. Torque x RPM = power (sorta...), like talking about position is torque, then speed is power. Same sorta relationship. So it's pretty erroneous to talk about power when talking about acceleration, because power is a rate of energy usage, not a force.

He is in a GTR, there shouldnt be traction problems with 300rwkw!

N1 turbos, if R33/R32 items - laggy POS's for the power they deliver unfortunately, so if thats the case then thats sorted out as to why:)

Put a set of Garrett -9s on there and for the same power, it'll all be all on maybe 1000rpm earlier, even more perhaps.

Also remember GTR's are quite heavy. 280rwkw in my 1450kg car feels similar to a GTR with 330rwkw and what, 1650kg?

When i was coming out of a corner, full throttle from 4000rpm with a sorted 330rwkw in a GTR - certainly some G forces goin on!

Traction is definantly not a problem and if the older generation N1's are naturally laggy that would explain a few things.

The power is like flicking a switch in 1st gear....Waiting waiting waiting... then BOOM its all on!

I guess I was expecting that in 2nd and 3rd aswell, that rush of Big Bore bike acceleration that I used to have in my Hayabusa days.

Makes 280rwkw@13psi and 315rwkw@19psi.

I guess these turbo's are at their limits so if they are older style N1's I might be in the market for an upgrade.

Would the -7's be that much better to warrant the expense?

From the always perfect wikipedia (all are curb weights):

R32 GTR: 1430kg

R32 GTR V Spec: 1480kg

R33 GTR: 1540kg

R33 GTR V Spec: 1550kg

R34 GTR: 1540kg

R34 GTR V Spec: 1560kg

Ye, so easily 1600+ with driver, wheels & heavier exhausts etc.

Traction is definantly not a problem and if the older generation N1's are naturally laggy that would explain a few things.

The power is like flicking a switch in 1st gear....Waiting waiting waiting... then BOOM its all on!

I guess I was expecting that in 2nd and 3rd aswell, that rush of Big Bore bike acceleration that I used to have in my Hayabusa days.

Makes 280rwkw@13psi and 315rwkw@19psi.

I guess these turbo's are at their limits so if they are older style N1's I might be in the market for an upgrade.

Would the -7's be that much better to warrant the expense?

Sounds exactly like how R33/R32 N1's deliver. For their time they were ok, but turbo tech has come a long way and improvements are signifigant.

Better wheel combination, ball gearing etc etc.

If you dont have cam gears fitted/setup, then you could potentially make it a "bit" better but it wont be fixing your issue overall i dont feel... but a good gain none the less in response.

So i guess the "wow" isnt there because its not going to be. Try and find a user on here with a 300-330rwkw -9 / GT-SS setup and go for a run in that and see if that is more what you want and go from there i reckon.

You want -9's, not 7's. 7's are a useless item these days really as the -9 superseed them in everyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's interesting seeing everyone talk about what level of risk they are happy to tolerate.  Building a GTR always has a level of risk, you could be that lucky guy that drops 20k on the engine build alone and still has the thing go pop on the dyno. Life is fun like that.  The way I see it, the thing is a toy to be enjoyed. I'd be happy to turn up the power on stock motor and limit the risk with sensible tuning and engine protection. If it still goes pop, it is what it is. The car isn't a daily driver so it can happily sit while a plan is made to sort it out.  Given this thing will be a street car only, I really feel it's worth the (relatively small if managed well) risk to turn the power up to around 350KW on e85.  I don't think anyone getting into the skyline game now is doing it out of logic. Surely it is a purely emotional decision so I'm not sure how important it is to think about the engine build logically. The heart wants what it wants.  @joshuaho96 little note for Josh, I run my 525 pump flat out all the time and through the factory lines without any issues. (excluding the melting connectors, that's sorted now. we'll pretend it never happened lol)
    • But the Nexus S3 is very expensive and won't be as purpose-built for the application as a separate electronic boost controller :^) More seriously my pet issue here would be that the Walbro 525 running at 100% duty cycle is going to require more FPR than the stock setup can handle. I'm also pretty sure from what I've seen elsewhere you might want to slow down the pump regardless unless you're going to come up with some way of upsizing the fuel lines coming from the fuel tank. Factory 8mm fuel line doesn't actually flow very much if you want to keep pressure drop down between the fuel pump outlet and FPR. If you really want to "keep it simple" I would run only as much pump as you need and source a fuel pump controller to slow down the pump in the vain hope of being able to run stock-style FPRs which are pretty dinky. Or just use the HICAS lines and it should be mostly fine. OP should also really think hard about what profile they'd want out of the turbo. My pet choice here would be the G1 profile rather than anything higher power but YMMV. I already think ~stock turbo lag is pretty bad so I don't want to make it worse. In "gentle canyon cruising" I found that I spent a lot of time around 4-4.5k RPM. I also recommend DIYing labor if you're detail-oriented enough. Costs are high for labor + if you do it yourself you can be your own quality control.
    • GTSBoy is again on the money. My actual advice? Sell the car. (really). For what it's worth as is, you can sidegrade into something much better. If you care about function then this is the actual move. If you want a Skyline to perform, set aside about $100K to do it. This is NOT a typo. You will see right away these are two very different mindsets. Realistically we're talking full restomod for any Skyline still kicking around. Have an honest think about which one you are.. and what you want to do, and how much you want to invest in this (with no return).
    • I promise there will be no chance of replacing the rad support....  It is barely twisted and it's way more likely to just be driven around with a slightly twisty support. As long as the headlight can be bolted in there then no harm no foul lol. The reo may need to be un-bent a little but truth be told if it all somewhat lines up and is hidden when the car is assembled the level of f**ks will be 0.0 
    • this thread delivers, once again Skyline owners, our cars spend more time off the road than on the road  
×
×
  • Create New...