Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So I have A 1990 j30. Payed $3300. Did some boot damage, and it needs a new battery so asking $2000 ono. new rear bumpers are about $200 and easy to source (many in my colour to). Just got me an R33 and want to get rid of this one. There is some scratching up the side from a mailbox (don't ask :D ) and the paint is not fantastic. The Gearbox is only a year or so old (was new when I bought the car). It makes a weird noise, but has never given me any drama in the past 30,000 kms. The car is reliable and quite frankly I dont really want to part with it. It's just not getting driven anymore :( Also... Ignore the sticky tape on the bonnet... It was my mates playign a joke on me and they took a photo. Made its way on to facebook, thus the only photo I have while I'm at work :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/334496-nissan-maxima-j30/
Share on other sites

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=6131...mp;id=702177872

Just to mention. The car has, air con, central locking, immobiliser, electric seats, windows and mirrors, cruise control and has a tip :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would hope so. I worry that it also might depend on whether the person working on the claim has had a good day or not. I could imagine that for example modified brakes would be an easy thing to point to for affecting the outcome of an accident. I don't know. I will keep paying my premium and hope for the best. But at the same time keep safe distances, drive defensively and avoid dickhead P-platers in lifted utes  
    • I was just working on the assumption that a cammed V8 is significantly less polluty than a Japanese I6 turbo was at the way they tested it in an IM240. Perhaps I'm wrong! Perhaps cutting one of the readings I got in half is a tall order. I don't know too many people who actually got their cars emission tested with a RB to really compare the data.
    • I thought it was just if “the modification effected/caused the incident”
    • Ok, good to know. I have open loop I think, I forgot which ones which but I am running the o2 sensor, brand new and I got a new boost solenoid because my last one was faulty and overboosting by a lot, but it's still technically overboosting. Haven't really bothered to hunt it down as I don't send it hard regularly.
    • You should not be able to see much smoke behind you if the mixtures are good - for ~13-14 psi anyway. It's not like you need to be running hell rich for only that much boost/load. Your tune might be a tad too rich. The tuner might have done that because they like to run a lot of timing. It's impossible to know what's going on from here. It won't be the actuator. It won't be the MAP sensor. Regardless of if by "MAP sensor" you mean either the Neo ECU's boost sensor (which is literally only that, a boost sensor so that the ECU knows a) that it's achieving boost, and b) that it is not overboosting) or you mean the dash gauge's MAP sensor (because it can't have any effect at all), or you mean the boost controller's MAP sensor (because it is very unlikely that it is running in closed loop, and so it is effectively just used to know when the pressure goes positive and so you can see the boost on the display, for the most part).
×
×
  • Create New...