Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all , in Sydney there are a few servos going under the AP banner and I noticed the 98ULP is claimed to have 10% ethanol content .

I'm curious to know peoples opinions on fuel octane and the different ways that a given fuels octane can be increased and the power potential because of it .

A good friend of mine in the automotive trades for nearly 40 yrs claims that if anything the lower octane fuels are better power developers with the only downside their tendency to detonate in high cylinder temperature/pressure situations .

He says that the higher octane petroleum fuels abilities to resist detonation actually make it harder to light the fire and burn efficiently .

Where I'm coming from with all this is that I suspect AP may be boosting the octane rating of say 95 ULP with ethanol and if that's the case is it possible that their 98E10 may burn better and possibly have a small edge over straight 98ULP - no ethanol .

I'm finding it actually resists detonation better than BP Ultimate in my old dinosaur tech (1986) turbo Subaru and I think it makes my Skyline run smoother as well .

Is anyone game to give this fuel a whirl in a high horsepower roadie ?

BTW it sells for around 1.32/L recently anyway which doesn't appear to be that much different to Ultimate - depending where you get that from .

Opinions ? Cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/334648-ap-98e10-interesting-brew/
Share on other sites

I and a number of other RB owners over here in NZ have been using Gull "Force 10" for over a year. It is an E10 - 10% ethanol blend. Tuners like it. I think the evidence doesn't support your friend's contention that lower octane fuels can produce more power. Have a look at the E85 thread to see the power people are making with the higher ethanol content!

By volume he is right, you would need more ethanol for the same power but only a little. From my research ethanol has more oxygen in it hence the bigger bang and burns a bit longer in the bore which all equals more torque.

You will notice 98 e10 runs a bit leaner up top if not tuned due to the extra oxygen tricking the o2 sensor, that is the issue for those with factory ecu's.

A good friend of mine in the automotive trades for nearly 40 yrs claims that if anything the lower octane fuels are better power developers with the only downside their tendency to detonate in high cylinder temperature/pressure situations .

He says that the higher octane petroleum fuels abilities to resist detonation actually make it harder to light the fire and burn efficiently .

Hes mostly correct. If you cannot change the ignition timing at all and it doesnt knock on 91 with that timing then it'd be a complete waste to run 98 as it burns slower and costs more. But due to it burning slower and being more resistant to knock you can run more timing compared to 91 before it knocks, which far outweighs any minute gain you'd have with a faster burning fuel (91) with less timing.

At the end of the day, contrary to popular belief, 99% of standard cars arent worth putting 98 in. The extra cost simply isnt worth the very small gains, if there are any at all. If you have the ability to change the timing then you'll allways make better power/torque with higher octane fuels and possibly better economy too, but its up to the user whether they can justify the cost.

And i doubt the e10 98 would give you the same burn properties of 95 without the knock, as octane ratings are essentially a measure of a fuels resistance to burning and knocking, i'd say it'd essentially perform like 98 but maybe with a tiny bit of the cooling benefit of ethanol, which would make it slightly more knock resistant.

  • 7 months later...

Hi peoples,

Sorry to bring a post up from the past but I am quite keen on an answer from people with RB's who have used Gull Force 10 which has 10%ethanol. It is the only 98 fuel in Whangarei and I am quite keen to start using it and see if it fixes some of my temperature related pinging. My little intercooler is struggling with a dyno tune I have done. It is fine when the intercooler is cool but if it warms up (it does so quickly), it flat spots because the knock sensor kicks in. I have been running 95 premium of which people think may be my problem.

I am hoping to put off buying a FMIC if I can for now but I am dead sick of the flat spot.

Mods are:

Z32 tuned ecu

3" zorst

K&N panel filter

Walbro fuel pump

Dyno tuned at 168rwkw (auto transmission)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Seemed to be good when Jeff owned it but they did a shit job on my car, probably worth a think before spending 10's of thousands of dollars where they might be cutting corners
    • Starting with issues 1 - 5, we have already run into a problem...!  Issue #4 contained 2x front brake calipers, instead of 1 caliper and 1x steering knuckle. Will have to call DeAgostini on Monday to sort it out. Anyway here's some photos.  Issue #1 is the front bumper, headlights and number plate. Issue #2 is the front wheel (with "We produced with spartan air." text on the centre cap!) and tyre, the front lip spoiler and cylinder head cover with ignition coils under the centre cover... which will never be seen again. Issue #3 is the bonnet and cylinder head. Issue #4 is the front strut, brake disc (with laser etched metal discs) and brake caliper. I stopped here because of the issue with the missing steering knuckle.  Next update will be #5 - #10 in a few weeks.
    • DeAgostini is one of a few companies that release quite large (the largest commonly available size actually) 1/8 scale models in a series of weekly issues over 100 - 110 instalments.  They release different models for different markets and DeAgostini Japan have release the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo last month. I've made two of these 1/8 scale sized cars (one an R35 GT-R from 2012 - 2014, the other I'm just about halfway through, a BNR34 Skyline GT-R from the 2Fast 2Furious movie) so when this R32 was announced there was no way I could ignore it as it's my favourite out of all Nissans.  Each issue costs around $20 so it costs about $2.2K when completed. I suppose it is very expensive for what it is, but the quality and details are really very good, and there are many "gimmicks" like fully functioning exterior and interior lights operated with a remote control, working steering, all doors/bonnet/boot/fuel lid open and close, the side mirrors fold in and it even has a speaker for the engine revving sounds when you turn the lights on.  Each issue comes with a magazine that tells the story of the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo from the first design stages of the BNR32 to Group A homologation and the various racing version that were run in the Japanese Group A and JGTC, and Australian Group A.  So I plan to update the build in this thread 5 issues at a time.  https://deagostini.jp/r32/?srsltid=AfmBOooKjxDc4EUK2rmXqMBPgyHfFJ24s4oEPJBNpnF-lFlsRoW0PE6P
    • As per title.. has anyone used so far? Keen to hear results, comparisons. In the market for a new mani for my new turbo. Any issues cracking?
×
×
  • Create New...