Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nikon D7000: In the face of competitor brands that have higher megapixel counts and superior movie-recording abilities, this is the camera that Nikon-using enthusiasts have been crying out for. And boy, looking at the spec sheets alone, it looks like Nikon has really delivered. This APS-C (with 1.5x FOV crop) camera delivers 16.2-megapixel photographs and records Full HD 1080p/24fps videos in AVCHD format (easily burned to Blu-ray). Recordings can be up to 20 minutes long (a far cry from the 5-minute clips of old) and edited in-camera. Frames can also be extracted from videos to print as photographs; and it’ll be easy to manage photo and video files with the dual SD card slots. With a magnesium alloy body (normally reserved for pro-level cameras such as the D300s, D700 and D3s) and a native ISO range of 100-6400 (extendable to 25600), this camera will sit somewhere between the D90 and the D300s for quality and performance. Pricing, however, is going to have to wait until October, when it’s expected to hit the market. Price not set

  • Replies 313
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

85L, f1.8, iso1600

IMG_9868_resize.jpg

Once it locks on its damn sharp!! But so slow to focus :ninja:

The guests taking photos!! So many digi cams!!

IMG_9951_resize.jpg

One from Saturdays wedding:

IMG_5164a_resize1.jpg

Main source of light is coming from the video guys flood light :cool: god i hated that thing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I appriceate you playing around with the pic and letting me know.. but it was not the style of processing i was going for.

The original pic looked like what you have done.

Anyways cheers tho :ninja:

oh and i have kept this sort of processing from the pre-wedding shoot.

Edited by siddr20

yeah sorry I thought you were saying the video guys floodlight was giving that look and you weren't happy with it... lol

I'm bored today so was looking for excuses to slack off... I'm a graphic designer so I'm always messing with photographers work hehe;)

Edited by NickR33
yeah sorry I thought you were saying the video guys floodlight was giving that look and you weren't happy with it... lol

I'm bored today so was looking for excuses to slack off... I'm a graphic designer so I'm always messing with photographers work hehe;)

Not having a dig at you, but you should be careful about editing other peoples pics mate. Some people (Mostly US people) get extremely offended if you don't ask if you can re-edit. I'm sure none of us here would mind, but still, would be nice to ask :ninja:

Nice edit though, i like it and good tips for the noobs out there!

yep realised that after I had done it (didn't help that I didn't read the post properly)... just jumping in a thread messing with someones work isn't the best idea!

anyhoo as someone who employs pro photographers all the time there is some really great work in this thread... sidd shoots people really well, which is harder than it looks

and employ me as lighting. Give me a roll of a gaffer tape and I transform into HE MAN>>>>>> THere's nothing i can't do. I even gaffer taped about 24 cats together to fill in for a cow on a movie set... true story (Actual truth of story can not be verified)

Ahhh the meat. Maybe the last weekend of OCT>? Or early Nov... thoughts?

little shell toes! yeeeeeeeeeeeah

being a photographers apprentice is easy these days, no film to worry about... just take a light reading and chat up the models hahaha

actually wedding photography is a good little earner... one of the guys we use also does weddings, works nearly every weekend at 3K a pop! he's very good though... to think I did design because I was told there's no money in photography...

That's some good coin. If only I was more of a wedding type of guy.

Also, worth noting I'm always ok with edits. If someone is gonna take the time to offer advice or a different perspective I'm gonna take the time to listen.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
×
×
  • Create New...