Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I played my Rogue last night for a bit, and Durotar is completely different.

Has UC or Silvermoon City changed at all like Orgrimmar has??

My warlock is 63, still 2 weeks till Cata so I have time to get to at least 75 :rofl2:

locks are awesome in pvp

the game will be a lot different at 85, stuff that is decent now might be better or worse at 85, warlocks will still be pretty good

warriors will get a huge buff because of the new skills they get, also the pace of pvp will be slower, no more killing people in 1-2 seconds

tranfered my warrior and paladin to Frostmourne, only plan on doing pvp, hope to get Gladiator again

if you want a big boost you leveling and have nothing to do now you should do 25 quests in icecrown and stormpeaks ready to hand in when cata goes live, it will get you about half way to 81 in less then 5mins if u do quests that have hand in all in the same spot

Edited by driftnick13

coming out tomory i think, the nerd que is gonna be large so i might just wait till the next day...

day or 2... there i always a few weeks of bad lag....DCing...random crap, and anoyed nerds raging all thru trade chat about issues that happen every time there is an Xpac.

so yeah i'd wait a week before trying to actually play.....lol

Farrrrk yeah, Cataclysm tomorrow! EB Games at the morley galleria isn't selling it till 4pm onwards :(

At least I can go straight after work and get it :D

its not as easy as it sounds, youll have to deal with xmas crowd and then the nerd crowd for eb

picked it up for 38 bucks at jb last night, no crowd, was really quiet actually.

i started a goblin warrior last night, the starting quests for them are awesome, and the racial abilities are pretty cool to, they come in handy

Edited by Clutch

Honestly i am not sure =[

Something about their overall appearance wasnt as... fearsome? as i had hoped.

Or at least being a hunter anyway. I think they will look amazing as melee type only. But i have every melee character already!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • A 180SX has a much better look than a FD. The roofline is far superior being a fastback. It's popups look better. In a world where we all subconsciously add a little bit of low, and wheels of our preference, it's just more handsome than the FD is. The FD just looks 'bubbly' in comparison. It can come down to preference, sure. But "The FD is the BEST looking (on appearances alone) 90's JDM car without question?" Nah. Plenty of questions lol. I could think of 8 cars I think look fundamentally better, and probably a handful of ones that look about on par with a FD. (like say a SW20 MR2) I feel people like/overrate the FD because of it's mythicality/rarity, its rotary and it's unpredictable nature. It probably drives great, you can stuff a ton of tyre under there, has a unique sound, light as hell. I feel that people reading this thinking "YOU CANT RATE A 180 ABOVE A FD BECAUSE A 180 IS A CHEAP DRIFT BUCKET" prove the point about bias as to what the car represents, moreso than how it actually looks.. I feel the 80's boxy/squared off look is becoming better looking due to time, and 90's melted soap bar aesthetics have not aged well. (yet?) And this thread is purely about looks :p
    • A red or yellow S15 wins my vote, Ack that it just scraps in with the 90's cars theme, but they are great looking little sports car Next would be a A80 Supra (pre face lift), whilst the A80 has its own issues, I feel is the best looking larger GT car As for the FD, "I" feel that the reason it triggers me in a non-positve way when looking at one, is like looking at a high maintenance pretty girl who you know is mentally unstable and likely to explode for no apparent reason
    • Yes, it's because it has hips and bulges on the top/front surface, a tiny cockpit and roof, and the skin looks like it is stretched over muscle. The proportions are....perfect. Long nose, short rear, short roof. What's not to like? It continues the theme started with the S1, that peaked with the FC, being "looking like a front engined Porsche", while gaining a little more of the 60's Mustang coupe profile and stretching the skin more tightly over the understructure. The FD is definitely colour sensitive though. Like all Mazdas. There are plenty of details on it that changed over the years that were either better or worse, could have been done better the first time and/or never changed for the worse. But...the same can be said for the NSX. In fact, that's probably even more true for the NSX. I've also just worked out that part of the reason I don't like the rear of the NSX is that the integrated wing is too similar to that shitful R33 rear wing.  
    • I wonder if people like the FD because it reminds them of old 60's roadsters and such. It just gives me such a 'roadster/soft cruising' vibe as opposed to anything more hard-edged and purposeful. That, mixed with 90's melted soap bar styling. It's hardly ugly, but it's kinda oddly proportioned to me, relative to about 10 other cars I had a think about based on this thread. 
    • Well, unless you are prepared to do it yourself, or to pay someone for a lot of labour, you don't want to move the rear camber around much at all. Close to stock length on the rear upper arms (both the RUCAs and the tension arms) will minimise the addition of bump steer. That means you should probably be satisifed with whatever neg camber you end up with as a result of it being lowered, and not try to dial too much of it out. Dialling it out by making big changes to the RUCA length will require effort put into tuning the length of the tension arms. And, apart from front caster and toe at both ends.....that's all there is to talk about. So, yes, toe settings, pretty much.
×
×
  • Create New...