276rwkw R33 12.76 @ 89mph

[benm]

then you weren't consistently doing something else throughout your runs then....

[Shane_954]

Fighting for traction with 215/60 15 G grids was causing the inconsistancy.

[WARLORD]

HP vs MPH mean shit when traction is factored in.

Losing traction shortens the distance available to use the HP which obviously means the MPH will be lower.

we're no talking about traction!!

eg my car shit traction 12.1@124 mph 310 kw atw

[Yts]

glen, (i own the orange r32 and my bro works with sash) that seems quite low, you were running sash semi slicks as well wernt u? what tyre pressure did you end up running? what gear did u finish your run in?

[R31Nismoid]

HP vs MPH mean shit when traction is factored in.

Losing traction shortens the distance available to use the HP which obviously means the MPH will be lower.

traction actually means it takes longer

I found with 2.1 60ft i was doing 110-111mph

With 1.9 60ft i was getting 108-109mph simply because you get to the other end faster

Lower ET's generally follow lower 60ft in the same car

[2rismo]

HP vs MPH mean shit when traction is factored in.

Losing traction shortens the distance available to use the HP which obviously means the MPH will be lower.

You should know better.