Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Im new to the forum, I figured id ask you guys since over here in the states this topic might not get any attention. Please excuse any gaps in knowledge as ive just began the installation of a r-34 Neo engine into my s13. :starwars:

Ive read up on many GTR to RB25 intake threads but no ones seemed to have tried this so far (as far as i can tell)

Now i dont have the GTR manifold in front of me, but from what I've read, the main problem seems that the stud pattern is completely different. Adapter plates are available but rare. One guy on here i believe redid his whole head (welded, cut, etc) to fit the GTR plenum.

people that have tried to cut the runners on the RB25 plenum and weld them to the 26 intake have said that the runners curve too much, which makes it hard to line up the runners on both manifolds

Now I know this may sound a little obvious, but after looking at some greddy inlet manifold for the RB25 it seems they solved the problem of the curving inlets, the 6 inlets on the aftermarket manifold seem to come out straight into the plenum. This made me think that if they did it, why cant it be done to the OEM 25 plenum?

My idea is to cut the runners just as they leave the the head so there is no curves, and weld on short straight portions of aluminum runner to basically extend the straight portions of the intake.

This should allow the RB26 manifold to be used. This solves the issue of hitting the VTC at the front, and it doesnt move the injectors any farther away from the intake ports. Im not sure about the rest, like the balancer shaft? (not familiar with it) and the vacuum/cooling ports. In addition i dont know how the electronics would work out ( including the IACV). Mechanically my theory looks doable to me though, which is the hard part.

Is this a valid theory? To me this seems stupidly obvious, so maybe im missing something here. It seems like the ports are paired up together (groups of 2) on both the 25 and 26 plenums. And they look to be of similiar shape.

If someone can confirm what im thinking, ( they have a 26 intake infront of them) I will go ahead and purchase the 26 intake and begin the process.

this seems like a stupidly cheap option, as the aluminum needed for this project would be minimal. in addition all of the rb25 injector/rail stuff could be reused. If someone could also chime in on how the rest of the sensors and cooling passages work that would be great. (ill keep researching)

any helpful input would be greatly appreciated.

thanks

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...Va-t328810.html

i was thinking about using adaptor plates etc. etc. but this way seems the easiest.

this is what im doing. but instead of directly welding the cut runners to the gtr manifold, im making a flange plate to weld to the cut runners, that will bolt to the gtr manifold. this way i can get in there with a die grinder and clean up any faults resulting from mismatched runners.

i think your talking about doing the same thing, but adding in a longer straight section? so an extra spacer between the cut runners and the gtr plenum?

im not going to use the itb's, i'll just get a plate welded on the front of the gtr manifold and run my stock tb.

i have done this on my rb20, its a lot of work and the heat you put into the manfold welding on the new plate for the gtr plenum/throttle

bodies makes it go like a banana, you then need to heat and press straight then mill both surfaces, i spent around 20hrs with the die

grinder. you weld then grind, weld then gring and on it goes to build up the bits that dont line up, then use a small flapper wheel

in the runners to smooth out and then it becomes the right shape.

ahh thanks for the link, thats almost exactly what im talking about doing. except id like to keep the ITB's :starwars:

I like your idea too, welding a flange to the cut runners makes the plenum easily removable if need be and the ports can be matched up better. I dont know if i will go that route simply because i dont have the facilities or knowledge to try and make a flange like that.

But like your idea, Instead of a flange, ill be welding in some runners connecting the rb25 oem flange to the gtr itb's and plenum. I wont be able to smooth out any bumps like your idea but, depending on how deep they are i might be able to get in there with a dremel from either the ITB side or the flange side.

In either case, i think the plan would work. so far...

Can anyone chime in on how to make the AAC valve to work?

Im also going to be running Air con on the car, so is there some kind of sensor on the tb that controls the idle for that?

If you want to run the itb's then you have to make a flange, can be done easily with a jigsaw if need be. The problem compared to the link above is that the rb25 runners curve a lot more and earlier than the rb20 ones. IMO an adapter plate is easier. If you are going to weld, simply mount the head flange to a head or a piece of plate steel to reduce the warping, thouhg you will still have to get it surface ground.

If you want to run the itb's then you have to make a flange, can be done easily with a jigsaw if need be. The problem compared to the link above is that the rb25 runners curve a lot more and earlier than the rb20 ones. IMO an adapter plate is easier. If you are going to weld, simply mount the head flange to a head or a piece of plate steel to reduce the warping, thouhg you will still have to get it surface ground.

thanks, I will most likely get the flange decked to ensure its flat.

there is a guy selling me a plenum including the throttle bodies and tps, what else is needed to run the plenum on the 25? do i need the AAC as well?

  • 1 month later...

ok attached is what i have now..

i am doing this to my neo stagea so i need to run the neo tps because of it bring auto.. now the neo runs a aac/iac(cold start valve) in one where as the gtr ran them seperatly. this is as far as i have got, i have the airbox underneath that the std gtr aac vavle is connected to. i just hope the ecu can run the gtr one.

depending on how the gtr iac vavle works/runs it will have to be connected seperatly somewhere else. other than that because you are still using the front runners to the rb25 like mine you'll have no drama with hitting vct or water inlet and you'll be able to use the std injectors too :D

if you have questions or want to share some more info pm me

post-4857-1287229962_thumb.jpg

post-4857-1287229971_thumb.jpg

post-4857-1287229978_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In a few years from now, you'll regret that. It'll eat away at you, knowing the truth of the ugly hiding beneath the beautiful exterior... 😛
    • I don't think the G2 profile is particularly dangerous for the engine per se, more just are you actually ok with the turbo lag trade-offs? If the answer is yes then go for it. I personally don't think I'd be ok with it because I spend so much time at lower RPMs and I really enjoy the feeling of being able to stay in 5th gear on the highway and just roll into the throttle to get boost. Or staying in 3rd gear on "gentle canyon cruises" without feeling the turbo lag too badly. The 525 pump should be able to run flat out on factory lines but I would bet the pressure drop from pump to regulator is quite impressive. I don't know how much it would be exactly but I've seen figures like 30 psi thrown around.
    • It's interesting seeing everyone talk about what level of risk they are happy to tolerate.  Building a GTR always has a level of risk, you could be that lucky guy that drops 20k on the engine build alone and still has the thing go pop on the dyno. Life is fun like that.  The way I see it, the thing is a toy to be enjoyed. I'd be happy to turn up the power on stock motor and limit the risk with sensible tuning and engine protection. If it still goes pop, it is what it is. The car isn't a daily driver so it can happily sit while a plan is made to sort it out.  Given this thing will be a street car only, I really feel it's worth the (relatively small if managed well) risk to turn the power up to around 350KW on e85.  I don't think anyone getting into the skyline game now is doing it out of logic. Surely it is a purely emotional decision so I'm not sure how important it is to think about the engine build logically. The heart wants what it wants.  @joshuaho96 little note for Josh, I run my 525 pump flat out all the time and through the factory lines without any issues. (excluding the melting connectors, that's sorted now. we'll pretend it never happened lol)
    • But the Nexus S3 is very expensive and won't be as purpose-built for the application as a separate electronic boost controller :^) More seriously my pet issue here would be that the Walbro 525 running at 100% duty cycle is going to require more FPR than the stock setup can handle. I'm also pretty sure from what I've seen elsewhere you might want to slow down the pump regardless unless you're going to come up with some way of upsizing the fuel lines coming from the fuel tank. Factory 8mm fuel line doesn't actually flow very much if you want to keep pressure drop down between the fuel pump outlet and FPR. If you really want to "keep it simple" I would run only as much pump as you need and source a fuel pump controller to slow down the pump in the vain hope of being able to run stock-style FPRs which are pretty dinky. Or just use the HICAS lines and it should be mostly fine. OP should also really think hard about what profile they'd want out of the turbo. My pet choice here would be the G1 profile rather than anything higher power but YMMV. I already think ~stock turbo lag is pretty bad so I don't want to make it worse. In "gentle canyon cruising" I found that I spent a lot of time around 4-4.5k RPM. I also recommend DIYing labor if you're detail-oriented enough. Costs are high for labor + if you do it yourself you can be your own quality control.
    • GTSBoy is again on the money. My actual advice? Sell the car. (really). For what it's worth as is, you can sidegrade into something much better. If you care about function then this is the actual move. If you want a Skyline to perform, set aside about $100K to do it. This is NOT a typo. You will see right away these are two very different mindsets. Realistically we're talking full restomod for any Skyline still kicking around. Have an honest think about which one you are.. and what you want to do, and how much you want to invest in this (with no return).
×
×
  • Create New...