Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if you went for a twin scroll GT3071R with a 0.78 housing you could get close to 300kw with cams and it would have a stupid amount of response. but this will be an expensive route as you need a twin scroll exhaust housing and you need twin gates to do it properly.

Another turbo that people haven't suggested is ether a TD06SL2-20G for just under 300kw or a T67 for over 300 with standard cams. Both these will need external gates as both the Trust and T3 flanged housings are external gate housings.

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

reason i ask is volk34 had his car on the same dyna pack dyno as you a couple weeks back and made 210kw. then today at the SAU-SA dyno day at willals

his car made 162rwkw. thats a 48kw difference between his 2 dyno runs

sorry to use your car as an example volk

There is something else going on there, in the past with the older version there was around 10% difference between dyna pack dynos and other drive on chassis dynos due to no correction for wheel slippage, but the newer versions seem to be pretty much the same as most mainlines.

Your talking about a 24% difference which sounds to me like something else is wrong. Also 162 would be just under what would be expected from a standard auto R34 (don't know what car his is) or is about right for a stock untouched R33. so what mods is he running, has his car been tuned? is it running more boost? was it running the same boost in Willals dyno?

Edited by D_Stirls
There is something else going on there, in the past with the older version there was around 10% difference between dyna pack dynos and other drive on chassis dynos due to no correction for wheel slippage, but the newer versions seem to be pretty much the same as most mainlines.

Your talking about a 24% difference which sounds to me like something else is wrong. Also 162 would be just under what would be expected from a standard auto R34 (don't know what car his is) or is about right for a stock untouched R33. so what mods is he running, has his car been tuned? is it running more boost? was it running the same boost in Willals dyno?

i think he has a auto r34 gtt. as for the other stuff i cant comment because i dont know.

"loksta6" you are now on notice and will receive an official warning..........followed by a ban if this slander towards a business continues.

Your post has been deleted but have attached a link to your warning fyi.

If anyone has an issue with a business, take it up with them but KEEP IT OUT OF HERE!!

thanks for all of your responses, as i had suspected gt3076 with .86 will be the one. i have all suporting mods and an eye out for some poncams. hopefully see and introduce myself next dyno day :P thanks.

i am pretty much going the same way mate

I'd get the .82 again if I was to buy another turbo. Response difference between .63 and .82 would only be a couple of hundred rpm max. And your going down the E85 route so the better flowing rear will make a world of difference when you start running higher boost levels. Come to think of it. Just get the 1.06 :D

after doing a bit more of a research your right Luke......63 and .82 rear housings dont have a world of difference in regards to response.....1.06 is in a league of its own isnt it??? :D

.63 rear housing should see me 300rwkw on 25??? mind you its going to be internal gated

ahh internally gated's a different story. get the .82.. you'll run into overboost issues with the smaller housing and IW.

FWIW mine is ex gated type .63 and makes 360 rwkw so the housing can flow more then 300 rwkw thats for sure.

While on the topic of turbo upgrades, I was looking into mix matching housings, staring with my 2530 ...

I'm thinking of upgrading the compressor side of my HKS GT2530 turbo.

The turbine side of the 2530 atm is a 76 trim (53.8 major - 47.0 exducer) wheel and 0.64AR T3 housing which I was going to keep.

Thinking of throwing on, on the compressor side ...

Garrett T04S upgrade kit

wheel: 59 / 76 / 60 trim

housing: AR70 (rated to 550hp)

Now the 2530 is internally gated. I'm looking for a responsive daily driven turbo for 250+awkw, with enough poke for track days and time attacks.

There is another T04S compressor kit, which may be too big for the 76 trim turbine ...

Garrett T04S upgrade kit

wheel: 61.4 / 82 / 56 trim

housing: AR70 (rated to 600hp).

Thoughts?

What you are in effect making is a GT2876R, they are a crap miss-matched turbo as the small turbine can't produce enough drive to drive the compressor wheel to full efficiency. The biggest i would go with a NS111 turbine wheel is a 71mm compressor which will give you in effect a GT2871R.

If you remember Ryan was running a GT2871R on his R33 and he was making 250 kw with stupid response. I would keep the T3 housing and buy a GT2871R CHRA and make up what Ryan was running

Garrett elude to the miss-match of the GT2876 when they state on the website;

* Best suited for unique applications such as asymmetric turbo installations

* Not recommended for general performance applications

Edited by D_Stirls
What you are in effect making is a GT2876R, they are a crap miss-matched turbo as the small turbine can't produce enough drive to drive the compressor wheel to full efficiency. The biggest i would go with a NS111 turbine wheel is a 71mm compressor which will give you in effect a GT2871R.

If you remember Ryan was running a GT2871R on his R33 and he was making 250 kw with stupid response. I would keep the T3 housing and buy a GT2871R CHRA and make up what Ryan was running

Garrett elude to the miss-match of the GT2876 when they state on the website;

Thanks for that. Now I've got a better starting point to go shopping :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...