Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 255
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

all the times were taken off me, I didn't go home with any time sheets, even though I normally do :D

here's some shit

Morning Course #1

Best Time Ranking Combined Time

1 29.18 3213 43.93 29.18 25 54.29 12

2 29.61 28.72 48.2 27.81 37.06 29.97 29.67 28.7 27.81 15 57.08 19

3 28.9 30.65 28.37 26.91 27.11 27.17 26.96 26.91 11 61.2 23

4 26.1 30.38 29.63 26.1 7 52.79 7

5 30.19 28.26 30.59 29.93 28.26 23 56.5 18

6 30.96 27.91 34.85 28.64 27.91 18 53.29 10

7 DNF 24.09 31.23 27.83 26.3 27.97 26.75 24.09 3 61.97 24

8 28.03 26.63 29.78 28.57 28.91 31.2 28.03 26.63 9 52.08 5

9 28.7 29.5 27.95 28.28 27.85 27.85 17 53.11 9

10 35.2 DNF 29.36 29.36 26 55.53 17

11 27.34 39.6 34.35 33.34 27.34 13

12 32.03 48.26 32.03 34 67.65 27

13 27.17 25.92 27.26 26.49 25.92 6 52.32 6

14 32.18 28.03 28.82 28.1 28.03 20 52.83 8

15 31.49 28.6 32.34 29.67 28.03 28.03 20 54.56 13

16 33 27.49 27.49 14 54.83 14

17 31.61 30.92 33.97 33.66 32.93 27.97 36.88 29.09 38.86 27.97 19 54.92 15

18 34.48 31.69 31.69 33 64.45 25

19 38.46 29.83 30.33 29.83 27 58.68 22

20 31 DNF 43.34 41.8 DNF 45.3 31 30

21 35.93 31.11 31.11 31 69.82 28

22 34.86 26.62 36.02 29.03 26.62 8 80.04 29

23 34.46 35.23 38.67 34.46 35

24

25 28.8 27.83 27.96 27.83 16 55.05 16

26 29.03 26.87 34.81 26.87 10 57.4 20

27 29.52 26.99 28.36 26.99 12 50.81 4

28 27.55 26.53 24.97 24.97 5 50.18 3

29 24.93 26.59 24.77 24.77 4 46.98 2

30 21.46 22.96 21.46 1 42.36 1

31 DNF 29.17 30.84 29.17 24 54.28 11

32

33 30.07 29.44 28.17 31.37 28.17 22 57.72 21

34

35

36 23.16 22.95 22.95 2

37 31.53 33.68 31.53 32

38

39 31.61 30.92 33.97 33.66 32.93 29.97 36.8 29.97 28

40 35.1 34.16 30.49 DNF 30.49 29 65.72 26

Morning Course #2

1 25.11 37.62 26.22 44.72 41.13 25.11 7

2 29.27 wd wd 29.27 22

3 wd wd 34.29 34.29 26

4 26.99 31.97 27.76 26.69 29.33 26.69 16

5 31.27 28.24 wd 28.24 20

6 28.14 30.69 25.38 25.38 11

7 wd 37.88 37.88 29

8 28.28 25.45 wd 25.45 12

9 wd 25.81 25.26 25.26 10

10 29.3 27.09 26.17 26.17 13

11 wd wd wd

12 wd wd 35.62 35.62 28

13 26.4 wd 34.02 26.99 28.4 26.4 14

14 wd wd 24.8 24.85 24.8 6

15 26.53 wd wd wd 26.53 15

16 27.34 27.34 19

17 26.95 27.97 32 26.95 17

18 wd 32.76 32.76 25

19 28.85 wd 29.2 28.85 21

20 wd wd

21 wd 38.71 38.71 30

22 wd 53.42 wd 53.42 31

23 wd wd wd

24

25 27.22 27.22 18

26 30.53 wd wd 34.46 wd 30.53 24

27 34.9 24.7 wd 23.82 wd 23.82 5

28 25.21 31.07 25.21 9

29 22.21 22.21 3

30 21.24 20.9 20.9 1

31 wd wd 25.11 37.32 29.24 wd 25.11 7

32

33 30.6 29.55 33.45 31.29 29.55 23

34 34.33 31.02 24.78 23.1 25.51 23.1 4

35 21.88 25.7 21.88 2

36

37

38

39

40 wd 35.23 wd 35.23 27

Black 33 10.14 10.27 9.6 10.04 9.67 10.17 10.41

Clio 8.61 9.5 8.47

GTW

Owen 1 10.22 9.28 10.4

Black 180 2 9.65 8.71 8.9 8.76 9.1 8.73 8.92 8.87

green s14 3 9.97 9.71 9.89* 10.12 9.98 9.69 9.91

dreapr 4 10.29 9.87 9.34

msdoof 5 10.09 9.78* 9.69 9.47

black 180 6 10.18 9.53 10.28 9.77 10.17

jay 7 8.89 8.87 8.89 9.22 9.03 9 9.25 10.1

andymoocow 8 10.74 8.87 9.46 10.4 9.98 10.07 40.4

silver cam 9 9.78 9.33 9.27 9.64 9.05 8.89 9.74

green wrx 10 9.68 10.2 9.99

cass 11 9.83 9.55 9.3 10.26

red 33 12 9.47 9.36

kinks 13 10.47 9.64 10.75 10.09 9.75

eric 14 8.33 8.28 9.00* 8.65*

silver 33 15 9.91 10.23 9.91 10.01

blue bmw wagon 16 9.97 9.96

17

red ss 18 10.93 10.85

black camaro 19 10.15 10.62 11.2

red 34 20 9.54 10 10.21 10.2 10.6 10.79

red ss 21 10.47 10.54

black 180 22 9.61 9.33 9.59

black camaro 23 10.71 10.72 10.67

24

norm 25 8.19 7.5 7.51

orange XR6T 26 8.53 8.5 8.68*

27 10 10.13 9.87

zane 28 9.71 9.23 9.53

29 10.44 9.85 10.03

reece 30 9.15 9.39

blue s14 31 10.14 10.07 9.49

32

melly 33 11.18 13.67 9.9 9.73

34

35

White 34 / 8 40 9.5 9.83 9.56

GTW_results.pdf

results.pdf

Clio in reverse would have done morning course 2 quicker than i did it going forwards... I can't say i had more fun as punting a car around some witches hats while driving backwards looked epic. but i can say I was more sideways :P

I heard the reverse lap was the 6th fastest overall?? Impressive :)

Thanks Doof.

I'm second on GTW :)

But Norm beat me by almost a whole second! Geez Norm, how'd you manage that? Your car must launch and accelerate like a beast!

After years of me egging Norm on, he's launching it right :(

Eric you've got some catching up to do now haha

Who ever had the timing sheets for the morning course two, was there a vehicle number written down there as "33.5"? If so, what was the quickest time on it?

I ended up with the sheets. Will look when I get home.

haha go me on the gtw, need to tighten my hand brake for next time for the other courses

Thanks Doof.

I'm second on GTW :banana:

But Norm beat me by almost a whole second! Geez Norm, how'd you manage that? Your car must launch and accelerate like a beast!

well i actually think its got a little bit more in it, i had a fair amount of wheel spin off the line and i was short shifting aswell

Who ever had the timing sheets for the morning course two, was there a vehicle number written down there as "33.5"? If so, what was the quickest time on it?

I was timing Morning Course 2 and I'm pretty sure you were 33.5 (Mell's car was 33 and you were driving it, hence the .5) I don't remember what the time was but it was up there.. I would have to have a look at the original time sheet (or a copy). From memory Reece was first in the Skyline, second in the Clio, Mitch was third in the Skyline then you were fourth, then Reece in the Clio in reverse was fifth (although it looks as though the times for the Clio in reverse were not included in the above results).. but that is just from memory, it may be slightly bais.

EDIT: I just had another look over the times and I would say that you have been put down as '34'. I remember that you started off slow and have a few tries before you got your good time. It would also mean you had the fourth fastest time which is what I said above :banana:

Edited by nerm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's excellent but I'm still breaking it in so I'm not 100% sure where it'll end up. I would say it's about 15% heavier than stock and the smoothness of the slip zone is quite progressive but you need to be a little patient compared to stock or it'll bite hard and stall. Stock I got away with absolutely horrid clutch control. Like I said before I couldn't even tell where the clutch would grab when it was stock so releasing way too quickly without enough revs it would just slip and the revs would drop lower than ideal but that would be the end of it. Currently there's a bit of a nasty clutch judder if I don't apply enough revs + find the exact wrong point of the slip point in the clutch pedal but it feels like it's slowly resolving as I drive it more. I would not recommend the competition clutch unless you really need the extra clamp force. I think this clutch combined with the Nismo operating cylinder is going to be exactly what I want. Enough bite that you need to remember the release point to avoid stalling or rough shifts, but progressive enough that it's not hard to drive by any means and not heavy at all. I tried a "super single" clutch on my friend's 997.2 Turbo 6MT and that was absolutely horrid. It runs an electrohydraulic power steering pump for the clutch power boost so there's zero feedback in the clutch pedal and there was a horrific clutch shudder well after break-in due to the lack of marcel springs or hub springs in the friction disk. It felt like the slip zone was the thickness of a single toe twitch as well so it was almost impossible to avoid stalling it unless you gave it a ton of revs and just dumped the clutch instead of trying to be smooth with it. I was terrified of pulling out in front of traffic. I have also tried some kind of "super single" on an EK9 and that makes this twin plate Coppermix look like a stock clutch. Releasing the clutch pedal even slightly too quickly feels like you're getting rear-ended. The pedal is extremely heavy as well and there's no vacuum assist like the GTR.
    • Yeah, well I was probably way underguessing the $300 figure anyway. Just multiplied a "normal" by 4 for the purposes of pointing out it's not cheap, particularly if it has to be repeated.
    • We have an alignment shop out here that does what you're talking about but he wants like 800 AUD a pop. DIY is "cheaper" but once you start accounting for the value of your time I'm not sure it's worth it.
    • The main catch phrase for any car is "the eye of the beholder", and "personal tastes and preferences" And as for the plastic "flares", I honestly think they look cheap and tacky, and I cannot see them aging well, maybe if they were body colour they might look better to my eyes, but, I would still prefer it the were more like the older WRX STI models that had the wider body metal panels In saying all this 5hit, I wouldn't buy a new WRX again, even if it had the wide body metal panels    
×
×
  • Create New...