Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It gives you more torque in low and mid range and then cuts out to give best power at top end. However you can't change the cut off point with the stock ECU and it is programmed to suit a stock as a rock motor. Obviously the optimum changeover point will vary with the amount of mods and state of tune of your particular motor. With most aftermarket ECUs you can set the cutoff point. When you have got it tuned as you want it you do a power run with it on then one with it off ,superinpose the 2 curves and where they intersect is the optimum cutoff point fot the best top middle and low range power and torque.

As Sydneykid often points out ....it's not the peak power figure, but the best usable power range that counts. If you don't believe that next time your at the drags do a run with and without it.

I had my VCT plug out and dyno'd my car. 120rwkw. The bottom part of the curve was the same for both runs up until the point where it was supposed to kick in. When plugged in, I got 177rwkw. There is no way that unplugging it gives you more power anywhere in the rev range as far as I am concerned. Are you sure it was that?

Some more food for thought. I tried disconnecting the VVT after I had an initial tune with aftermarket cams, as I thought perhaps there was too much overlap with the inlet being advanced, thus causing additional lag due to reversion.

the car was sooo much worse bottom end/midrange, and the lag got worse.

I also put the cam and rough engine specs into Dyno 2003 software, and tried advancing the inlet. The resultant change in the power curve showed gains the further I increased the inlet (only went to 20 degrees), but the interesting thing was that the curve fell over and produced less power above 4500rpm. According to the Tomei stock cam spec sheet, 4500 is where NVCS switches off.

Looks like nissan got it right.

I can confirm Steve's info.

We have played with the VCT quite a few times & found the stock 4,500rpm switch off point to be pretty much spot on. The VCT is switched on @ 1500rpm & off @ 4,500rpm. Keeping VCT switched on higher in the rev range (via aftermarket ECU) loses 10-15rwkw top end, as you'd expect. Turning it off sooner loses mid range.

For a gain to be made by having VCT disabled it will mean poor bottom end torque :( Unless you have upgraded inlet/exhaust cams dialed in spot on.

Steve,

What's this Dyno 2003 software....

You say you could calculate figures and adjust timing and overlap and stuff?

Could you put the figures of an R-34 GT-t into it and figure out why my engine didn't gain any power with four degrees retard on the exhaust cam??

BASS OUT

I would need all the cam specs, when they open and close, and what lift. I would also need to know how much lift the cams have and how much the NVCS moves the cams, as it is different for Neo AFAIK.

I think it would be worth throwing a timing light on your car too, just to make sure its setup right.

At the end of the day though, I cant see how it wouldnt make some difference, as even moving the timing 1 deg makes a difference which dyno 2003 can pick up - remeber the software is designed for a 'perfect world' scenario, and will give an indication of possible gains and losses but cannot take into account every possible variation.

I believe Warpspeed is better at me than manipulating it, I have only played with my cam timing and that is all, but yeah, I will give it a go if you can find out the specs

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
    • Ask me a bit later this week before payday
    • I agree that delayed payment probably isn't the most suitable solution. It seems a solid complete transaction would be best. As I wouldn't be using this sale as a line of credit that would typically earn interest, we can probably arrange a much cleaner single transaction deal. I can do $92.52 today. Would you prefer EFT, or Cash on Pickup?  😛
×
×
  • Create New...