Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ahaha nice thread david... bringing all the tree huggers n murders together... since we're all here now lets organise a picnic ill light the bbq with my fast and furious flames coming form my decat... n the that poxy tree hugger nic a31 can do the dishes.... let me know date and place????? who's in??? ooo wait my cars impounded n im goin court soon.. soo im gona need a lift? :/

post-76568-1285597799_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/335959-decat/page/6/#findComment-5468760
Share on other sites

Since I couldn't find it, I emailed EPA a while ago and finally got a reply.

Dear Nic:Your email was forwarded to an Officer in the Environmental Enforcement Unit of the Department, who has responded below; I trust this helps with your query:

The Commonwealth Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989 allows for the Minister to determine national vehicle standards. Information about the Australian Design Rules and emission requirements may be found here and here.

In regards to offenses for removing a catalytic converter, Section 13A of the Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989 provides offenses for the modification of a standard vehicle and making it non-standard, and applies a penalty of 120 penalty units.

The Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914 (Section 4AA) specifies a penalty unit to be $110, and thus the removal of a catalytic converter would carry a maximum penalty for an individual of $13,200. In relation to an offence by a body corporate, Section 4B allows for a court to issue a penalty of 5 times the amount of the maximum pecuniary penalty that could be imposed by the court on a natural person, being $66,000.

Settled.

Edited by Nic_A31
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/335959-decat/page/6/#findComment-5471383
Share on other sites

I would like to see the figures for anyone who has actually received this fine in Perth, i recall this discussion on another forum a while ago.. i'd put my money on 0.

...even the inspectors @ pits will tell you to install a cat and come back again. Good scare tactic though!

Edited by endless
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/335959-decat/page/6/#findComment-5471586
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...