Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I haven't been in a Skyline with a TS GT35R *yet* but given they are a 6, the gains are only going to be at least as good as the 4cyl ones I've been in.

After reading one of discopotato's long posts twin scroll is more effective on 4 cylinder engines and less so on 6 cylinders and almost not worth it on an 8 cylinder. Sure it will be helpful on a 6 but I dont think the statement that it will be at least as good as a 4 cylinder is correct.

After reading one of discopotato's long posts twin scroll is more effective on 4 cylinder engines and less so on 6 cylinders and almost not worth it on an 8 cylinder. Sure it will be helpful on a 6 but I dont think the statement that it will be at least as good as a 4 cylinder is correct.

There is probably a certain amount of theorising with both of our viewpoints, how do you decide he is more correct than I (or vice versa for that matter? I am happy to stay objective...)?

A lot of that will depend on the execution of the whole thing, for example on a V8 - where is the rationale that twin scroll would be less beneficial on a V8 than it would on a 4cyl when a V8 is essentially two 4cylinders? I wrote a big rant ages ago on GTR UK forum regarding the potential benefits of twin twinscroll turbos on a cross plane V8 to combat the effect of the unevenly spaced ignition events on each bank.

Also, I have been in Nissans running twin scroll turbos - just on a TS GT35R to compare with the exact equivalent single entry GT35R... hence restraining opinion. Given Disco doesn't sound like he can provide the same comparison, I'd consider it reckless stating a fact without confirming the theory.

This is the only one i have handy (ie on this comp), full owner built car him and his old man did a great job, went on the dyno with no issues (other than bit of boost creep from the 6 boost mani)

The power graph is not really a good example as the boost curve starts at 14psi and tapers up to the 19psi point, not enough gate pressure but until the owner gets used to it we wont dial it up (the blitz gate and blitz i-color will dial it out a piece of piss).

If it was making the full 19psi by 3600-3800 like the normally do the they make around 220rwkw @ 4k and 270-280rwkw @ 5k etc... with the ramp rate i use, maybe more responsive on a roller.

post-34927-1287366832_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1287366876_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1287367325_thumb.jpg

There is probably a certain amount of theorising with both of our viewpoints, how do you decide he is more correct than I (or vice versa for that matter? I am happy to stay objective...)?

A lot of that will depend on the execution of the whole thing, for example on a V8 - where is the rationale that twin scroll would be less beneficial on a V8 than it would on a 4cyl when a V8 is essentially two 4cylinders? I wrote a big rant ages ago on GTR UK forum regarding the potential benefits of twin twinscroll turbos on a cross plane V8 to combat the effect of the unevenly spaced ignition events on each bank.

Also, I have been in Nissans running twin scroll turbos - just on a TS GT35R to compare with the exact equivalent single entry GT35R... hence restraining opinion. Given Disco doesn't sound like he can provide the same comparison, I'd consider it reckless stating a fact without confirming the theory.

Are you going up against the mighty discopotato!

Have you seen the length of his posts??

As we all know length DOES count... :P

This is the only one i have handy (ie on this comp), full owner built car him and his old man did a great job, went on the dyno with no issues (other than bit of boost creep from the 6 boost mani)

The power graph is not really a good example as the boost curve starts at 14psi and tapers up to the 19psi point, not enough gate pressure but until the owner gets used to it we wont dial it up (the blitz gate and blitz i-color will dial it out a piece of piss).

If it was making the full 19psi by 3600-3800 like the normally do the they make around 220rwkw @ 4k and 270-280rwkw @ 5k etc... with the ramp rate i use, maybe more responsive on a roller.

That is fairly impressive considering the boost issue!

Is that a T3 10cm flanged turbo or a 8cm Mitsubishi flange?!?

Also how much do you think a standard manifold would strangle through mid range and top end?!?

After years of discovering most people read key words and assume they know what you were saying and having to reiterate or explain things, I am quite a lot lazier about what I say now :P If someone decides I might possibly have something worth sharing or elaborating on and ask, I will.

This is the only one i have handy (ie on this comp), full owner built car him and his old man did a great job, went on the dyno with no issues (other than bit of boost creep from the 6 boost mani)

The power graph is not really a good example as the boost curve starts at 14psi and tapers up to the 19psi point, not enough gate pressure but until the owner gets used to it we wont dial it up (the blitz gate and blitz i-color will dial it out a piece of piss).

If it was making the full 19psi by 3600-3800 like the normally do the they make around 220rwkw @ 4k and 270-280rwkw @ 5k etc... with the ramp rate i use, maybe more responsive on a roller.

Nice power delivery... will be even better with the boost corrections as you mentioned.

thanks for putting up the chart.

Cheers

Justin

Awesome!

Thanks Trent! Thats what I wanted to see!

does that set up use the ebay turbo? Does it have cams?

How would a HKS 3037 pro S .68 rear compare to this in regard to response and top end power?

Trent-

Does that owner built car have cams?

If not how much would a set of poncams affect this particular set-up in terms of response?

Its fairly identical to my what my set-up will be aside from poncams, standard/front facing plenum, Haltech. (possibility of ITB's)

Basis of the build will be a long motor from Darren Lewis, Lewis Engines.

Edited by RBceffy25

At the end of the day I don't think any other turbo kit will come close to this sort of response and power figures for a $1000 flat, delivered to my door incl. custom lines to suit RB25 and fittings and all gaskets required for install.

Looks like its off to ebay! :)

Also, can anyone tell me what size wastegate would be ideal for between 17-22 psi on this turbo? (T67 10cm)

50mm :)

Bit big maybe? probably better suited to running stock boost, which defeats the purpose of the whole exercise.

I think most people with similar sized turbo with similar boost levels seem to be running anything from 38mm to 44mm.

I was thinking 40mm?

Grab a 44mm tial, big enough but no too big, always best to err on the large side with these things imo

No worries.

So would you say then that the difference between 40mm-44mm, at these boost levels, would be negligible?

Cheers in advance for all the advice.

At the end of the day I don't think any other turbo kit will come close to this sort of response and power figures for a $1000 flat, delivered to my door incl. custom lines to suit RB25 and fittings and all gaskets required for install.

Looks like its off to ebay! :)

Also, can anyone tell me what size wastegate would be ideal for between 17-22 psi on this turbo? (T67 10cm)

yeh i'd like to give one of these a go on my rb25 too.

but what manifold are you going to be using? you won't get it on the stock one without a spacer and its gonna be restricted up top....

a 6 boost would be nice but not at $1400!!! then at the other end you got the nasty china junk for $200 that won't last a week, is there any alternative for highmount manifolds around the $800 range?

yeh i'd like to give one of these a go on my rb25 too.

but what manifold are you going to be using? you won't get it on the stock one without a spacer and its gonna be restricted up top....

a 6 boost would be nice but not at $1400!!! then at the other end you got the nasty china junk for $200 that won't last a week, is there any alternative for highmount manifolds around the $800 range?

I thought they were $1250 from Kyle(6boost)?

Regardless of price, I will be using 6boost low mount with 44mm external gate. same manifold in the photo from Trent. If you are not willing to fork out for a proper, high quality, tuned length

manifold then I suggest you use a second hand TRUST item with a Mitsubishi/trust style flanged turbo (you can still find full kits for RB engines w/ turbo, manifold, wastegate and dump pipe) or try to track down a HKS cast item. Your only other option would be a custom log or un-tuned high-mount manifold, which I would think would be in your price range. If your handy with a bit of welding, you could have a go at making one your self, using steam pipe bends from any gas fitting place. Anything else in your price range is simply not worth pissing on. Do it once, do it right I say. If i were you I would just save the extra and get the 6boost. The benefits far out weigh the cost.

Hope this helps!

I had a GT35r on my RB25 and found it to be really good, Fineline is another person on here that has as well.

We both made 500+hp atw out of them and mine was nice and progressive, I would have to search for a dyno sheet but.

I had a GT35r on my RB25 and found it to be really good, Fineline is another person on here that has as well.

We both made 500+hp atw out of them and mine was nice and progressive, I would have to search for a dyno sheet but.

What size turbine housing?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
×
×
  • Create New...