Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sorry for starting a new thread if someone has already posted it

sound like a silly question but you know what i kneel on the floor for half an hour and got no idea of how

i just simply pry it with a flathead srew driver

i feel the lens is going to break :(:):D :D

sorry for starting a new thread if someone has already posted it

sound like a silly question but you know what i kneel on the floor for half an hour and got no idea of how

i just simply pry it with a flathead srew driver

i feel the lens is going to break :D:(:):blink:

I did this: easy just take ur time.

Start by pulling with ur finger tips the edge of the trim where the red lens thing is (outer edge). You want to be firm but not a quick yank, just slow force...

Once the tabs pull out continue along the bottom of the door trim until you get to the inside corner.

open the door, lay under it and hold out the door trim. With a small flat blade screw driver wedge it in one end of the bulb and then push the end out of the clip.

Then just grab the bulb and pull it out.

Take off negative terminal of battery as lights will be on otherwise. Just roll windows down first.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would hope so. I worry that it also might depend on whether the person working on the claim has had a good day or not. I could imagine that for example modified brakes would be an easy thing to point to for affecting the outcome of an accident. I don't know. I will keep paying my premium and hope for the best. But at the same time keep safe distances, drive defensively and avoid dickhead P-platers in lifted utes  
    • I was just working on the assumption that a cammed V8 is significantly less polluty than a Japanese I6 turbo was at the way they tested it in an IM240. Perhaps I'm wrong! Perhaps cutting one of the readings I got in half is a tall order. I don't know too many people who actually got their cars emission tested with a RB to really compare the data.
    • I thought it was just if “the modification effected/caused the incident”
    • Ok, good to know. I have open loop I think, I forgot which ones which but I am running the o2 sensor, brand new and I got a new boost solenoid because my last one was faulty and overboosting by a lot, but it's still technically overboosting. Haven't really bothered to hunt it down as I don't send it hard regularly.
    • You should not be able to see much smoke behind you if the mixtures are good - for ~13-14 psi anyway. It's not like you need to be running hell rich for only that much boost/load. Your tune might be a tad too rich. The tuner might have done that because they like to run a lot of timing. It's impossible to know what's going on from here. It won't be the actuator. It won't be the MAP sensor. Regardless of if by "MAP sensor" you mean either the Neo ECU's boost sensor (which is literally only that, a boost sensor so that the ECU knows a) that it's achieving boost, and b) that it is not overboosting) or you mean the dash gauge's MAP sensor (because it can't have any effect at all), or you mean the boost controller's MAP sensor (because it is very unlikely that it is running in closed loop, and so it is effectively just used to know when the pressure goes positive and so you can see the boost on the display, for the most part).
×
×
  • Create New...