Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all, i bought this setup not long ago to put in my 180 but unfortunatly things have changed for me and if i can make most of what it cost me back ill be selling it up.

basic rundown.

RB26DET

sard 600cc injectors

tomei poncams

modded sump for rwd

unknown bottom end. can only be presumed standard.

Heavy duty clutch

loom etc.

$3800

T78 33d kit.

trust mani

hks 50mm gate

dump pipe

turbo looks to be in really good condition other than some slight marks on the comp wheel (run with no filter)

$2900

Power fc

Greddy twin intake

Z32 AFMs

fc commander

$1400

trust oil cooler kit.

sandwich plate etc all lines included with earls fittings

$800

i have other little things like stock ecu, a/c compressor etc.

nothing will be seperated until ive sold the motor/turbo kit.

cost for all of the above complete is $7600 firm.

post-29077-1284532170_thumb.jpg

Edited by boostd gem

interested in the turbo kit.

what power did u make with this setup at what rpm. do u have a dyno graph?

what is a t78 rated at horsepower wise?

thanks

julz

for anyone interested, this wasnt run without a air filter, so no worries there, it's just one of the air filter's was damaged so i didnt worry giving it to him. they were run with blitz twin pods so there is no issue there. I'm also pretty sure this engine runs oil restricters due to the oil pressure readings it was getting (always really good).

this engine is built for huge power, if that's what u want, then u cant go past this package.

Is this your old engine nisskid?

yeh mate, really strong engine, and the T78 was amazing, i didnt wanna get rid of it, but had to let it go as i was in too much debt because of it haha

i just wanna see someone get this and give it a proper tune, see what it can do, i lost the tune not long after i bought the car and was too retarded to work the boost controller, so it ran on a base map and 12psi for most of the time i had it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...