Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You can pickup an R33 GTS-t for $18k, you can also pickup an RB26DETT for about $7k so thats $25k and you got a RWD Skyline with the power of a GTR. A decent condition R33 GTR = $40k, you see what i'm talking about ? ?

With all the support systems though, it will still cost. If you are chasing around 300rwkw it can be done with an RB25 - changing the engine will only be an added cost, as you will still need all the associated support systems.

If you do go down the replace engine line though, just to go a little out of left field, RIPS is running 10s in a R32 GTS4 which hasnt been hugely modified, but has a 3L conversion. He sells rebuilt 3L conversions for around 3.5K landed in aust (not sure about duty and gst), but that is a whole lot cheaper than an RB26, and will easily support over 300rwkw with much better torque due to its stoke and the extra capacity.

If your going to go down the replace motor path, (i dont think its required, RB25DET is capable of those times)... then why not get an R32.

Cheaper initial price, slightly less weight, and has same engine options, only you will need to bin the gearbox as well.

I think the general consensus here is each engine/car combo is more than capable on the std internals with good support systems and good tuning, including suspension.

You can make power without all that, but be prepared to wear a bill if you go beyond the threshold and get detonation. It only takes that one time, then it is worth the good rebuild but you will still need the support systems and tuning.

Well a 11Sec is my goal as well and is easily achieveable with stock internals. The secret to using stock internals is more fuel!.

Here is my plan of attack.

R33

RB25L Engine / RB30 Bottom End (adds more torque and better turbo spoolup)

Greddy or Custom Plenum

Z32 AFM with Intercooler Piping

Power FC

T04E HighFlow (A/R 0.60)

HKS Cams

Ogura Flywheel

Blitz BOV (High Rev Pressure Release)

6 x 550cc Injectors

040 Bosch Fuel Pump

BRK7E Spark Plugs (copper holds boost better than any plug on the market)

Some good clutch

After all these major mods you will be in the low 12 / high 11 sec bracket.

hope this heaps, maybe ive missed something but feel free to add to the list.

cheers

ak

i've run a 12.98... now not 11 i know, far from it.

But that was on street tyres... 225's with a 2.1 60ft.

A very poor suspenson setup, the R31 IRS is a shocker for drag racing the way i have it at the moment.

And the driver aint the best :D

Not making excuses, just saying that times can be better, anyways...

I'll bet that if i had Nitto's/slicks and suspension (suspension plays a goos part)

Then then my times would be fast approaching a low 12 run. That was with 203rwkw on 13psi (non standard turbo)

My 31 weighs in pretty much the same as a 33 does so weight is the same.

With approx 240rwkw i'm confident that on slicks it would come very close to high 11's.

I've also seen RB30et's in VL's... yes they do have a weight advantage compared to a 33.

With approx 220-230rwkw break consistent very high 11's with slicks.

But are you after HIGH 11's... or Mid-low 11's.

because mid-low 11's IMO, your talking a lot more $$$.

Hi rev, Wilson did a 1.45 on Nittos, Munroe did a 1.48 and Lee did a 1.6.  I've got plenty more examples if you like.  None of those were in Perth though, in fact I can't find any decent radial tyre times from Perth.  Must be the track.

I think I might have been hasty in my generalisation. I just seem to see and hear of alot of rear wheel drive car owners unable to extract decent (for semi slick) 60ft's from the Nitto's considering how expensive they are compared to the other brands.

I've seen low 1.5's out of BFG's in rearwheel drive only cars with very modest power to weight ratio's ,unlike keir and munro's monsters :P, and fairly average suspension. For the money I still think the traditional BFG and Mickey T's offer the best bang for buck and overall performance (not sure if the nitto's last longer for road driving tho' so that might be a bonus).

Hey guys thanks for all the comments and info...

After a short think about it i am thinking if i was to go ahead i would be aiming at a more realistic time of mid to high 12's.

I really had no intention to replace the internals and money is of the esscence...

Thanks again

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...