Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What the japs are really doing? we do not know... I would love to go there personally to check it out.

We have at least two top Japanese tuners in Auckland including one (Soichi from ST HiTec) to whom people bring RBs from all over NZ for a tune but I guess Japan is closer than Auckland for you at the moment!

We have at least two top Japanese tuners in Auckland including one (Soichi from ST HiTec) to whom people bring RBs from all over NZ for a tune but I guess Japan is closer than Auckland for you at the moment!

so does he go with the leaner tune an less timing or rich ?

And as someone else said would be good to see some fc or other maps of aggresive tunes !

HKS , APEX , MINS , TRIAL , all famous shop race cars AFR 10.8 at before cat (around same place std O2 sensor).

They are try to 0-300km/h at YATABE also 0-1000m race in 1990s then they found best AFR 10.8.

AFR 11.3 some time engine blow but 10.8 never engine blow.(around 800hp RB engine )

Std R33 25det AFR around 10 also std IMPREZA AFR around 9.5.

So AFR 10.8 is not rich.

I think AFR 12 at muffler is not problem for street car.(FMIC , full exhoust , boost 12-13psi)

But bigger turbo car need richer than AFR12.(Im adjusting AFR 11-11.5 at muffler.This is around 10.8-11.3 at before cat)

Thanks Toshi, I never knew there was a difference between AFR at muffler and AFR before cat. I have just installed an AFR sensor before the cat. I'll have to keep that in mind...

of course there is thats the whole purpose of the cat.

HKS , APEX , MINS , TRIAL , all famous shop race cars AFR 10.8 at before cat (around same place std O2 sensor).

They are try to 0-300km/h at YATABE also 0-1000m race in 1990s then they found best AFR 10.8.

AFR 11.3 some time engine blow but 10.8 never engine blow.(around 800hp RB engine )

Std R33 25det AFR around 10 also std IMPREZA AFR around 9.5.

So AFR 10.8 is not rich.

I think AFR 12 at muffler is not problem for street car.(FMIC , full exhoust , boost 12-13psi)

But bigger turbo car need richer than AFR12.(Im adjusting AFR 11-11.5 at muffler.This is around 10.8-11.3 at before cat)

It's an interesting topic, been watching this space for a while and I was hoping for Sydney's top Japanese tuner to respond to this..

it is good to get some insight about this from Toshi

seems like the tuning method between Japanese tuners and Australians are not too different after all, its just the mail order tunes that are richer for margin of safety

Hey guys,

Just want to add a couple more things here.

Basically, when AFR is rich, piston and cylinder can simply cool down by fuel.

So if you drive stock R33 at the race circuit for 12 hours, it will never blow the engine.

Just for extra information, when Factory Subaru liberty turbo (all stock) made the fastest record (faster than Saab turbo) in 0-100000km in oval circuit at 1989 year (maybe 1988), its AFR was 9.5. If it actually was AFR12, it probably couldn't have completed the circuit.

Factory tune is to be safe but I do know that the Japanese tuners do shave the margin a bit resulting in AFR10.8 at before cat.

The other thing is, adjusting AFR to 12 in summer, it wouldn't be too suitable for winter.

In winter AFR will end up around 13 and i'd say it not too safe on a race circuit.

I hope I was convincing enough.

Just to finish off, I think it'd probably be better in the long run to tell the tuners what exactly you're after; better fuel consumption or higher power and where you'd be using the car. street or circuit because these will all be important factors.

so does he go with the leaner tune an less timing or rich ?

And as someone else said would be good to see some fc or other maps of aggresive tunes !

rich - haven't got a map - can't afford him atm!!

HKS , APEX , MINS , TRIAL , all famous shop race cars AFR 10.8 at before cat (around same place std O2 sensor).

They are try to 0-300km/h at YATABE also 0-1000m race in 1990s then they found best AFR 10.8.

AFR 11.3 some time engine blow but 10.8 never engine blow.(around 800hp RB engine )

Std R33 25det AFR around 10 also std IMPREZA AFR around 9.5.

So AFR 10.8 is not rich.

I think AFR 12 at muffler is not problem for street car.(FMIC , full exhoust , boost 12-13psi)

But bigger turbo car need richer than AFR12.(Im adjusting AFR 11-11.5 at muffler.This is around 10.8-11.3 at before cat)

With a name like Toshi I'm guessing you are a Jap tuner??? :cool:

I for one dont mind running my car from 12.0 coming into boost and dropping gradually to 11.0 say from about 6000 up(ie. before the cat).....That way fuel consumption would not be that bad and the extra fuel will be there to protect the engine higher up in the rev range

Is there some thing i am not getting????.....

Is there sooo much power to be gained by leaning out the afr from 11.0 to 12.0 on pump??? or is it that skyline owners are so cheap they cant afford to keep on filling up the juice so they go complaining to their tuners that their fuel consumption has gone out the window after he has raised the boost a couple of psi and retuned the ecu so now its up to him to get more power out of the car BUT maintain its factory consumption rate???

Again i know which way i'd rather have it.....

i think most workshops doing a dyno tune on a car would do it with an 02 sensor up the muffler

this saves time and is quicker and easier to perform

how many workshops would remove the factory 02 sensor and put a wideband sensor in the bung on the dump for tuning and then remove it when done ?

its old school tuning for rich.... even the newer factory euro turbo cars are tuned fairly lean... ie leaner than 12.5... not that we go there often... customer and car determine the tune really.

I've seen perfectly good results from 13:1 and around 500hp on an endurance race car.

i think most workshops doing a dyno tune on a car would do it with an 02 sensor up the muffler

this saves time and is quicker and easier to perform

how many workshops would remove the factory 02 sensor and put a wideband sensor in the bung on the dump for tuning and then remove it when done ?

My tuner (Scots not Japanese) gets all his customers to put a second bung in the dump for the wideband.

If youre going to bother putting the bung in, may as well just install the wideband in the dash... Much more practical than climbing under the car and installing it each time.

There isnt much difference in readings from dump to muffler from what I have seen. Perhaps there would be on a stock cat?

It can change slightly from downpipe to tailpipe.

Here is a dyno sheet of a car i tuned here, because this car was from a different country and their fuel is not as good as ours I richend it up on the top end. (different altitude also) the higher you go the richer you go, so at home his car is running around 11afr

You can actually see the power raise start to drop exactly where the AFR richens up .5 or less of a AFR

I have a saying, Keep em rich keep em cool. A cool engine is not going to melt unless something is very very wrong.

"skyline owners so cheap because they would rather run 12's to save fuel" what a ridiculous statement. 1 afr on boost will make no difference in fuel economy. Do you drive wide open throttle to work in the morning? if so I hope you don't live near my family.

4deb47c23194t.jpg

I always ask for AFR 11.5 when I go to get a tune. It always comes out at 12.0 or higher. No idea why tuners insist on running leaner for a few percent power and end up with higher temps if you ever use it on the track or highway.

It can change slightly from downpipe to tailpipe.

Here is a dyno sheet of a car i tuned here, because this car was from a different country and their fuel is not as good as ours I richend it up on the top end. (different altitude also) the higher you go the richer you go, so at home his car is running around 11afr

You can actually see the power raise start to drop exactly where the AFR richens up .5 or less of a AFR

I have a saying, Keep em rich keep em cool. A cool engine is not going to melt unless something is very very wrong.

"skyline owners so cheap because they would rather run 12's to save fuel" what a ridiculous statement. 1 afr on boost will make no difference in fuel economy. Do you drive wide open throttle to work in the morning? if so I hope you don't live near my family.

4deb47c23194t.jpg

what the main reason behind richening it up after what i assume is peak torque?

im guessing just to cool it down a little?

do you add more timing in during the enrichment after 6500RPM

what the main reason behind richening it up after what i assume is peak torque?

im guessing just to cool it down a little?

do you add more timing in during the enrichment after 6500RPM

from what I've read to keep the pistons cool, the quicker than move about the more friction & heat it will cause right?

richening up the tune up the top will keep the pistons/rings/ring lands in tack but this sacrifices power output.

and from what toshi has said before and after cat, yes there is a difference, I've had my car on a dyno and the A/Fs were different to what my wideband was reading (pre cat).

Most tuners are save time/money by tuning at the exhaust tip, but I don't believe that's the best way to do it.

I personally have pumped in extra timing after MBT, for my old setup it was around 5600rpm, and the timing for row 17 read something like

Row vs Timing 10/13 11/13 12/13 14/13 15/14 16/14 17/15 18/11 19/11 20/11

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks Duncan! Yeah it's street use for me only. Maybe occasional track day. Any difference in noise when running with the two pumps? I would expect the lift pump to be more quiet than the main pump so hopefully not? And yes, unfortunately quite a big price difference to the simple hanger setup. Though I'm usually willing to trade money for better reliability and future-proofing. Buy once, cry once and all that. I'd be very happy to never have to deal with fuel pump / wiring issues again  
    • The old manifold was quite under the GTR strut brace.  The new manifold is quite [unknown] the GTR strut brace. The GTR strut brace was needed to clear the bonnet vents. The Old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, but not the bonnet vents. The old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, and the new bonnet without vents. But I am hoping the GTR strut brace clears the new manifold :p
    • On the bright side, at least you knew that it happened and remedied before anything happened. A friend of mine just took his Fiat 124 to a shop for an oil change and they didn't tighten the oil filter housing properly. 4.5 quarts spewed out and even after refilling + tightening the cap the engine has a tick now.
    • So, more pain. The FAST manifold is a little larger than the stocker. This is problematic because there really wasn't much clearance to begin with, so going from 'barely enough' well into 'no' is sad based on the external dimensions of the thing, even though where it bolts to the head is the same. Result is the fuel rails sit a good 25mm higher, and this is a bit of an issue with the wiring that runs behind the motor, and the fuel lines, and everything else. When pushing the manifold on, it required a huge amount of force to crush wiring looms to fit it, sensors like the MAP sensor are about 1mm from the firewall, and the FPR just has to bend ABS lines to be forced into place. After some brainstorming and some sad drinking, the loom for some reason ran from the grommet behind the ABS sensor, then to the driver side head, then back to the passenger side head. So all of this was pulled back and stripped, a few wires cut and rejoined, so that the 'branch' was now on the passenger side's head as below: Before you basically couldn't see anything behind the driver head. This is much improved! The MAP sensor is now pointing up (instead of at the firewall) Brackets have been made up for the rail. The rails are for a LS1, the manifold is designed around a LS2 as it's base. Which of course has slightly different bracketry and water pump clearance, hence the mods people need to do. Should be hopefully mounted tonight. I spent money on a new FPR that is slightly more compact than my Turbosmart FPR1200. The gauge has also been moved to the rail. There's also apparently an ORB to AN Union instead of the adapter, because the ~25mm of the current adapter is going to make the difference. Provided this all goes together and arrives today, it'll be the totally not stressful attempt to start it.
×
×
  • Create New...