Jump to content
SAU Community

Tuning Afrs


Don Dada
 Share

Recommended Posts

What the japs are really doing? we do not know... I would love to go there personally to check it out.

We have at least two top Japanese tuners in Auckland including one (Soichi from ST HiTec) to whom people bring RBs from all over NZ for a tune but I guess Japan is closer than Auckland for you at the moment!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have at least two top Japanese tuners in Auckland including one (Soichi from ST HiTec) to whom people bring RBs from all over NZ for a tune but I guess Japan is closer than Auckland for you at the moment!

so does he go with the leaner tune an less timing or rich ?

And as someone else said would be good to see some fc or other maps of aggresive tunes !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HKS , APEX , MINS , TRIAL , all famous shop race cars AFR 10.8 at before cat (around same place std O2 sensor).

They are try to 0-300km/h at YATABE also 0-1000m race in 1990s then they found best AFR 10.8.

AFR 11.3 some time engine blow but 10.8 never engine blow.(around 800hp RB engine )

Std R33 25det AFR around 10 also std IMPREZA AFR around 9.5.

So AFR 10.8 is not rich.

I think AFR 12 at muffler is not problem for street car.(FMIC , full exhoust , boost 12-13psi)

But bigger turbo car need richer than AFR12.(Im adjusting AFR 11-11.5 at muffler.This is around 10.8-11.3 at before cat)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Toshi, I never knew there was a difference between AFR at muffler and AFR before cat. I have just installed an AFR sensor before the cat. I'll have to keep that in mind...

of course there is thats the whole purpose of the cat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HKS , APEX , MINS , TRIAL , all famous shop race cars AFR 10.8 at before cat (around same place std O2 sensor).

They are try to 0-300km/h at YATABE also 0-1000m race in 1990s then they found best AFR 10.8.

AFR 11.3 some time engine blow but 10.8 never engine blow.(around 800hp RB engine )

Std R33 25det AFR around 10 also std IMPREZA AFR around 9.5.

So AFR 10.8 is not rich.

I think AFR 12 at muffler is not problem for street car.(FMIC , full exhoust , boost 12-13psi)

But bigger turbo car need richer than AFR12.(Im adjusting AFR 11-11.5 at muffler.This is around 10.8-11.3 at before cat)

It's an interesting topic, been watching this space for a while and I was hoping for Sydney's top Japanese tuner to respond to this..

it is good to get some insight about this from Toshi

seems like the tuning method between Japanese tuners and Australians are not too different after all, its just the mail order tunes that are richer for margin of safety

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys,

Just want to add a couple more things here.

Basically, when AFR is rich, piston and cylinder can simply cool down by fuel.

So if you drive stock R33 at the race circuit for 12 hours, it will never blow the engine.

Just for extra information, when Factory Subaru liberty turbo (all stock) made the fastest record (faster than Saab turbo) in 0-100000km in oval circuit at 1989 year (maybe 1988), its AFR was 9.5. If it actually was AFR12, it probably couldn't have completed the circuit.

Factory tune is to be safe but I do know that the Japanese tuners do shave the margin a bit resulting in AFR10.8 at before cat.

The other thing is, adjusting AFR to 12 in summer, it wouldn't be too suitable for winter.

In winter AFR will end up around 13 and i'd say it not too safe on a race circuit.

I hope I was convincing enough.

Just to finish off, I think it'd probably be better in the long run to tell the tuners what exactly you're after; better fuel consumption or higher power and where you'd be using the car. street or circuit because these will all be important factors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so does he go with the leaner tune an less timing or rich ?

And as someone else said would be good to see some fc or other maps of aggresive tunes !

rich - haven't got a map - can't afford him atm!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HKS , APEX , MINS , TRIAL , all famous shop race cars AFR 10.8 at before cat (around same place std O2 sensor).

They are try to 0-300km/h at YATABE also 0-1000m race in 1990s then they found best AFR 10.8.

AFR 11.3 some time engine blow but 10.8 never engine blow.(around 800hp RB engine )

Std R33 25det AFR around 10 also std IMPREZA AFR around 9.5.

So AFR 10.8 is not rich.

I think AFR 12 at muffler is not problem for street car.(FMIC , full exhoust , boost 12-13psi)

But bigger turbo car need richer than AFR12.(Im adjusting AFR 11-11.5 at muffler.This is around 10.8-11.3 at before cat)

With a name like Toshi I'm guessing you are a Jap tuner??? :cool:

I for one dont mind running my car from 12.0 coming into boost and dropping gradually to 11.0 say from about 6000 up(ie. before the cat).....That way fuel consumption would not be that bad and the extra fuel will be there to protect the engine higher up in the rev range

Is there some thing i am not getting????.....

Is there sooo much power to be gained by leaning out the afr from 11.0 to 12.0 on pump??? or is it that skyline owners are so cheap they cant afford to keep on filling up the juice so they go complaining to their tuners that their fuel consumption has gone out the window after he has raised the boost a couple of psi and retuned the ecu so now its up to him to get more power out of the car BUT maintain its factory consumption rate???

Again i know which way i'd rather have it.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think most workshops doing a dyno tune on a car would do it with an 02 sensor up the muffler

this saves time and is quicker and easier to perform

how many workshops would remove the factory 02 sensor and put a wideband sensor in the bung on the dump for tuning and then remove it when done ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its old school tuning for rich.... even the newer factory euro turbo cars are tuned fairly lean... ie leaner than 12.5... not that we go there often... customer and car determine the tune really.

I've seen perfectly good results from 13:1 and around 500hp on an endurance race car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think most workshops doing a dyno tune on a car would do it with an 02 sensor up the muffler

this saves time and is quicker and easier to perform

how many workshops would remove the factory 02 sensor and put a wideband sensor in the bung on the dump for tuning and then remove it when done ?

My tuner (Scots not Japanese) gets all his customers to put a second bung in the dump for the wideband.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If youre going to bother putting the bung in, may as well just install the wideband in the dash... Much more practical than climbing under the car and installing it each time.

There isnt much difference in readings from dump to muffler from what I have seen. Perhaps there would be on a stock cat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can change slightly from downpipe to tailpipe.

Here is a dyno sheet of a car i tuned here, because this car was from a different country and their fuel is not as good as ours I richend it up on the top end. (different altitude also) the higher you go the richer you go, so at home his car is running around 11afr

You can actually see the power raise start to drop exactly where the AFR richens up .5 or less of a AFR

I have a saying, Keep em rich keep em cool. A cool engine is not going to melt unless something is very very wrong.

"skyline owners so cheap because they would rather run 12's to save fuel" what a ridiculous statement. 1 afr on boost will make no difference in fuel economy. Do you drive wide open throttle to work in the morning? if so I hope you don't live near my family.

4deb47c23194t.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always ask for AFR 11.5 when I go to get a tune. It always comes out at 12.0 or higher. No idea why tuners insist on running leaner for a few percent power and end up with higher temps if you ever use it on the track or highway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can change slightly from downpipe to tailpipe.

Here is a dyno sheet of a car i tuned here, because this car was from a different country and their fuel is not as good as ours I richend it up on the top end. (different altitude also) the higher you go the richer you go, so at home his car is running around 11afr

You can actually see the power raise start to drop exactly where the AFR richens up .5 or less of a AFR

I have a saying, Keep em rich keep em cool. A cool engine is not going to melt unless something is very very wrong.

"skyline owners so cheap because they would rather run 12's to save fuel" what a ridiculous statement. 1 afr on boost will make no difference in fuel economy. Do you drive wide open throttle to work in the morning? if so I hope you don't live near my family.

4deb47c23194t.jpg

what the main reason behind richening it up after what i assume is peak torque?

im guessing just to cool it down a little?

do you add more timing in during the enrichment after 6500RPM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what the main reason behind richening it up after what i assume is peak torque?

im guessing just to cool it down a little?

do you add more timing in during the enrichment after 6500RPM

from what I've read to keep the pistons cool, the quicker than move about the more friction & heat it will cause right?

richening up the tune up the top will keep the pistons/rings/ring lands in tack but this sacrifices power output.

and from what toshi has said before and after cat, yes there is a difference, I've had my car on a dyno and the A/Fs were different to what my wideband was reading (pre cat).

Most tuners are save time/money by tuning at the exhaust tip, but I don't believe that's the best way to do it.

I personally have pumped in extra timing after MBT, for my old setup it was around 5600rpm, and the timing for row 17 read something like

Row vs Timing 10/13 11/13 12/13 14/13 15/14 16/14 17/15 18/11 19/11 20/11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTX2860R Gen 2 is an option. No, it doesn't actually do much. The basic problem with wanting 600 whp out of the factory twin turbo setup is a few things. One is that the twin turbo piping is just so, so inefficient. The front and rear turbos are not actually working evenly. The rear turbo is always moving more air than the front. On top of this the OEM rear compressor inlet is rubber that likes to collapse causing a huge intake restriction. The merge doesn't even wait until the intercooler to happen, and it happens at a 90 degree angle. This is why you see some discussion about "turbo shuffle", where in certain conditions one turbo can actually force air to go backwards into the other compressor and stall it out, then once the other turbo recovers it stalls out the first turbo in a cycle until you do something to break out of it. The other issue is that the RB26 is just not that efficient an engine. It needs a surprising amount of ignition timing to reach MBT for a given cylinder pressure so all that time in which the cylinder is pressurizing before TDC is just wasted energy. An N54 might be around 10 degrees BTDC on a stock turbo getting into the boost. An RB26 is closer to 25 BTDC. Net effect is a turbo roughly the size of what HKS uses on the GTIII-SS (smaller than the R3/GCG Japan "GT2860-1" -7s) is only good for maybe 550 crank hp or low 400 whp while a roughly comparable turbo on an N54 can deliver something like 700 crank hp and obviously drivetrain losses are greatly reduced when you aren't burning a bunch of power on keeping a hydraulic pump + transfer case preloaded all the time. So yes, you can make a lot of power but there's a reason why people go single turbo for the numbers you're asking about. Don't forget that the RB26 can't even do a straight line pull without oil starving on the stock oil pan either. Baffles can help, but really you just need more oil capacity.
    • Yeah sure, which messenger app is it?
    • would you like to be added to the messenger group?
    • Found some from 2009. The lobster bends were smoothed out on the inside with minimal gaps (perhaps 2mm) where the silicone joiners were used. 
    • And if you have to drive it in a civilised (or excessively woke) US state, find a way to register and insure it in a redneck state, so you can roll coal in it without worrying about legalities.
×
×
  • Create New...