Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

wasn't there real reason Paul went to motec ???? it can't just be about logging

I'm happy you chose vipec congratulations !!

I'm not naive i just cant stand the crap that some people carry on about

Motec don't sponsor anybody EVERYONE has to pay for it vipec on the other hand i dont know

P.S whats your story about operating temperature of the unit ???

PSS how is the vipec more accurate ?????

Unless he lied to me about it... I don't think so.

Thankyou.

Just keeping you on your toes :rofl:

PS: look at the specs

PSS: as above

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Am I the only one that had trouble reading this?

Try to use some decent grammar mate, your post sounds like it was typed by someone with ADD.

im sorry you had trouble

but if you can hear my post your smarter than me i can only read it ?

PS if you can get me a script for some dexies that would be great

i already had paid nearly 10 grand for the adl3 and e888 and egts with my m600...thats why i still have it in the car..

the vipec v88 logging now is very good for all forms of motorsport...

i can now buy a vipec 8 channel egt amp for 580.00 and about 90.00 per egt this will do the same job as the e888 and motec egts which was 2000.00 odd..also we now do a great afr which uses a ntk 5 wire sensor and if you have a v8 it has afr 1 & 2 in the logging.. the adl3 dash is great but is an overkill for my logging requirements..

i log egts, wheel speed, clutch input shaft speed , afr or lambda ,and oil & fuel pressures & all engine data , all of theses can be logged just as well in the v88 logging..

if i didnt loose 1/2 my money on the e888 and adl 3 i would sell it all...and just use a 1200.00 racepack dash for gauges only..

oh and swiper the fox changed ecus and has split 2 engine blocks , oh or could it be something i am missing....going from 9.4sec passes to 11 sec ... doh.. its got nothing to do with the ecu is my point here...

i think they are both awesome ecus ..as i tune cars every day... thats all we really need to here....one is in a gold box and priced like its is gold ...

hope this helps...

ummm were is dirtgarage when you need him for some good old motec bashing ??? bigmikespec has you idol gone away ? someone has too keep up the fight and it may as well be you now ?

what ecu does swiper the fox's car have now ??? not the inferior one does it ?

even mark is his gtr still run's an motec adl3 and motec e888 to measure the greater temperature extremes you talk about

how many real top level motorsport cars run motec I mean REAL race cars i.e dakar,rally raid,alms then to the national stuff like aus safari,finke,arc,super taxi's

class 1 offshore power boats and the list goes on and on

don't these class's operate in the most rugged extremes of the environment has to offer BUT the vipec is still better

but vipec make you car idle so much better like when does that really matter racing is Wide Open Throttle where it's meant to matter

Thanks for the reply guys. Bit of flames going around, but its all a healthy debate. Motec is a great ECU, no dobut, and I'm not selling it - but its a premium option amongst today's current up and coming ECUs. Basically I am trying to justify my thinking around using a v88 instead of an m800, to take advantage of the options and learn a new ECU for fun. It sounds like the Vipec is the mid-range ECU of choice, with all the high end features of the motec options included in the cost - a big win.

Just to clarify a few points:

My lambda control on the Motec using a PLX Lambda meter and gauge does not work right as an input to the ECU. I get a lot of interference, probably from the CDI in the race car and it craps out entirely. I am having troubles with 3.5 software, that has custom input calibration, so I am running 2.x software which gets it running sweet and perfect. Upgrade to 3.5+ gives me a lot of over fueling under load and idle. talking 11+ AFRs at all times, even with the o2 sensor and lambda table. Basically I need to re-do the whole map from scratch to run 3.5+ but it runs perfect on 2.x software so I leave it at that and deal with the poor fuel consumption due to having no Motec Lambda. (no custom sensors on 2.x software).

M800 will not be sold, but I will be upgrading to Adv functions, anti lag and launch control once the GTX4202 comes in.

Cost Breakdown

- Motec M800 Loom + Sensors (Estimated) - $700

- Motec CDI Loom - $100 or so

- Motec Features advanced functions + anti-lag and launch control - $600

Cost: $1400.

Vipec V88 - ~$2500 or less with everything + all options and I can port the CDI over and I have a new ECU that runs without having to dick around with it or buy options for. $1000 is cheap for this convenience, and it seems to be a good tuning ECU from the reports on the forum.

Godzilla - Running a Motec is like that. You keep on paying and paying because you paid so much on the setup - you might as well pay that extra 1-2-5k to get it right since your outlay has been huge. I would love to buy the ADL + Pro Analysis + expanders, but f**k... its so expensive!

I know what I'm doing sounds a bit backwards, but when you have a motec and you want/need these features... and you paid so much for the ECU - it feels like you are getting raped out of your money for a stupid hexadecimal access code that is emailed to you.

Options that I will use

Logging

Anti-Lag

Launch Control

Lambda

Knock Control

All of these are factory on a v88 and costs $2,000+ on a Motec for the OPTIONS.

Motec is a great ECU - nothing being taken away from how good it is. I want to know HOW good the Vipec v88 is. For ~$2500 you get a lot of ECU for such little money. Does the V88 have a Plug and Play 1JZ Loom? I know they have a 2JZ one.

My mate did a 3 day workshop at motec and one of the head engineers told him they recently dropped almost $1mil purely on software development so you know you are getting the best with motec, I really doubt any of the other products would come close to this sort of funding.

Dont know if this helps as I'm running the plugin Vi-pec ecu in my R33, comes with alot of the extras (anti-lag etc) just cant have many extra inputs/outputs as the V88. Mine cost around $1700 I think for the board. Have had it in there for about a year now with no problems what so ever.

My car is my daily but sees the track a fair bit too.

Vipec has a faster processor and is more accurate, operates at greater temperature extremes...

mike your yet to explain this statement ??

i was of the belief that the m800 runs two processors ?

or is this the vipec marketing style ?

Adriano, I was looking at getting an Autronic back in 2004-ish for the VL Turbo instead of the Motec and the hardware was OK, but you needed to run a different CAS sensor disc for the autronic. The software interface sucked at first glance. The motec MS-DOS software 1.6 was much more thought out and logical to setup. Autronic was the cheaper contender to the Motec back in the day, but I was not really impressed by it, so I didn't buy one. I've downloaded the new software now, its an improvement, but Autronic doesn't really do it for me.

Motec M800 Specs ( from memory)

Motorola 40mhz 32-bit processor. The V88 may have chosen the same processor as the Motec. I do not think the motec m800 runs a dual processor - first I have heard of it.

V88 Specs:

40 MHz Specialised Automotive Microprocessor.

Ignition control to 0.1 degree, fuel to 0.01 ms -

32 Bit Calculation -

10 Bit ADC Resolution

Max 20000 RPM

I would go as far as saying that the V88 is heavily based on the M800 from the paper specs, however it is the ECU software/firmware development, voltage /current drivers and that really differentiates between aftermarket ECUs of similar hardware.

The goal of the ECU is to input analogue sensor information, modify into digital information, calculate based on the data and algorithms and resend an analogue signal back to the controlling device and repeat the cycle over and over again. Therefore, how the ECU controls the voltage to the outputs and accepts the voltage from the sensors is of paramount importance, which is probably why the Motecs have been regarded as one of the most tuneable ECUs out there.

Update: it is probably one of these processors from Motorolla on both the M800 and V88.

MPC535: 32-bit Power Architecture Microcontrollers or MPC565 or MPC566

MPC565 can run at 40 and 56 mhz - if you change the crystal you can 'overclock' your processor by upping the FSB.

MPC566 can run at 40, 56 and 66mhz.

MPC535

MPC535diagram.jpg

MPC566

MPC566diagram.jpg

The advanced Power Architecture™ MPC535 32-bit embedded microcontroller from Freescale is an excellent choice for complex, cost-sensitive industrial applications that operate in a wide range of climates and environments. Ideal applications include building control / security, service processors and commercial POS (point-of-sale) systems. With a highly integrated set of peripherals including 1 MB Flash memory, a 40MHz Power Architecture core and Floating Point Unit, you can speed products to market at a cost effective price point.

The MPC535 is backed by the exceptional performance record of the Freescale Semiconductor* MPC500 family of 32-bit embedded controllers. You do not have to compromise performance or dependability.

PROTECT YOUR TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS: With the MPC535, as with other members of the Freescale MPC500 family, you have a clear migration path between products and from previous generations. As needs change, you can easily modify or upgrade products cost effectively, and with minimal development impact.

The MPC535 also leverages a wide range of development tools and support software already available for this computing platform , thereby helping to minimize development time.

Freescale also offers a multi-output power supply device, the MC33394, which provides the voltage levels and sequencing necessary to allow plug and play use of the MPC500 family. Refer to the Related Links section of this product summary page to view information on the MC33394.

*The Semiconductor Products Sector of Motorola, Inc. became Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., in 2004.

Features

1M byte of internal FLASH memory (divided into two blocks of 512K bytes)

32-Kbyte static RAM (CALRAM)

A 22-timer channel modular I/O system (MIOS14)

One TouCAN modules

One enhanced queued analog system with analog multiplexors (AMUX) for 20 total analog channels. These modules are configured so each module can access all 20 of the analog inputs to the part.

One queued serial multi-channel modules, which contains a queued serial peripheral interface (QSPI) and two serial controller interfaces (SCI/UART)

A J1850 (DLCMD2) communications module

A NEXUS debug port (class 3) – IEEE-ISTO 5001-1999

JTAG and background debug mode (BDM)

512k logging processor (related to the above)

Processor: Freescale (Motorola) MPC555 running at 40 mhz

Programming Language: Integer assembly, custom TPU microcode for fuel and spark control

Injector Drivers: Eight saturated drivers, with thermal and overcurrent protection

Injection Type: Full Sequential, with timing lookup by rpm and fuel pulse width

Injection pulse width resolution: 32 bits, 2us per count, using indexed table lookup with upto 65535 rows and columns

Ignition: Single channel distributer system with dwell control

Ignition timing resolution: 16 bits, .005 degree crankshaft, using indexed table lookup with upto 65535 rows and columns

Crankshaft speed resolution: 45 or 90 degree timing reference; 32 bits, 2us per count

Other Drivers: Four, rated 12 amp each, with thermal and overcurrent protection

Sensors: Standard GM for MAP, TPS, CTS and MAT. Also battery voltage and camshaft hall

Idle Control: Bosch/Ford single wire PWM at 150 htz, full PID control with cold table warmup

Closed Loop Fuel: Narrow band O2 sensor, full PID control from idle to 5000 rpm.

Total program loop execute time: at 700 rpm; 20us, over 3000 rpm; 10us (from flash)

Datalogging: All sensors read every 90 degrees crankshaft and sent out SCI, data rate maintained through 12000 rpm.

Interesting homebrew ECU Project using the above processors

http://users.ameritech.net/socrace/Firmware.html

Not sure how often you planned to plug and unplug the Motec if you went that way - and having done it once before, found the whole process more than a pain. Might want to get advice from Motec on disconnects, a lot of the multi-pin connectors have limits, I seem to recall the AMP ones we had were around 100.

  • 10 months later...
i can now buy a vipec 8 channel egt amp for 580.00 and

about 90.00 per egt this will do the same job as the e888 and motec egts which

was 2000.00 odd..also we now do a great afr which uses a ntk 5 wire sensor and

if you have a v8 it has afr 1 & 2 in the logging.

Any more information about these EGT amps and AFR Meters ?

You are the first person ive heard complain about the autronic software, what specifically dont you like about them?

yeah most good tuners I know quite like the way autronics work. just takes a bit of time to get your head around the efficiency based stuff but good once you know how to use it.

the autronic is a great option for the money. but for this user who already has a M800 and CDI I'd be getting the 2nd car set-up to use that.

I would go as far as saying that the V88 is heavily based on the M800 from the paper specs, however it is the ECU software/firmware development, voltage /current drivers and that really differentiates between aftermarket ECUs of similar hardware.

Thank god someone said it. I see all these bloody keyboard tuners and bench racers telling me all the time: "XXX brand ECU is better than a motec/autronic/whatever as it has 8 inputs vs the motecs 7 and it has 10 outputs where as the motec only has 6, plus this whizz bang ecu has 30X30 map where as the motec/whatever only has 20X20 map and it's processor is faster blah blah blah."

the reality is if the ecu has enough inputs to monitor the sensors you need and enough outputs to drive your injectors, igntion and other solenoids etc (boost control, idle motor etc) then any more is just a wank. THE REAL difference between ECU's is not quantifiable with a number or rating. it's in the base programming of the ECU (it's 'smarts'), it's in the way the ECU interpolates between values, it's in the logic of the thing and how it deals with stuff. 3d and 4d mapping etc is also nice but you can just tell in the way some cars run whether the ecu is any good or not.

sadly you cannot measure this stuff and on paper 2 ecus may have the same hardware, the same inputs and outputs, the same map resolution but in the end one will run the car like a swiss watch and the other will run it like the busted arse of a thai lady-boy gigolo.

this is where stuff like motec is very good. they put a lot of time in their basic algorithms and logic programming and their ecu's are 'smart'.

I also am not a big fan of their pricing system where you buy an ECU that half works and then pay through the nose to get passwords to unlock all the good shit but I guess it works for people who don't need advanced functions and just want a good sound ECU.

I have little experience with vipec so I cannot comment on how good they are in this area of unquantifiable stuff but of ecus I do have experience with I do know motec is very good.

it's like diamonds, their weight is measured in carats (easy to compare), the clarity is measured too (easy to compare), even the colour is measured against a scale but beyond those things, of most importance is how well the stone is cut and there is no grading system for that. 2 stones of equal size, clarity and colour and both the same traditional round brilliant cut. one could be worth 50% more than the other based on how it's cut with the right proportions where as the cheaper one was a 'greedy' cut and sacrificed the proportions to gain a higher yield from the un-cut stone. so it is with ECUs, the stuff you can't measure is just as important as how many injectors it can run sequentially.

being a vipec dealer and now tuning at a workshop that does motecs, we are now starting to buy Vipec's when we would have used Motecs.

Autronic is a very good ecu, but it is lacking on ign outputs (4 only, must use wasted spark on the 6 cyl or go a CDI), they also have faults, sometimes we need to smash them hard on the ground when they stop working. However when a Autronic comes in for a tune its easy money, the way VE works on these things are very close to the vipec, but it makes it a little easier to do the tune depending on the setup.

The Motec is a very good ecu, i have grown to like them, once you know where everything is and how it all works its a old clunker that its hardware has not been changed for how long now? tuning them without the logging options sucks, Try tuning a 800hp car with no map tracing or logs... Its not very much fun when you are usually spoilt with the vipec software features.

The V88 is the new bad boy on the market compared to the older ecu's you are comparing them to, the software is a dream to use and everything is layed out to get the job done well and fast, the support was second to none and everything works properly! it even supported Electronic throttle without any expensive updates and the electronic throttle works very good.

I would rather tune vipec over all the other ecu's, then motec then autronic, but the haltech? thats another story but lets just say I favour them more then the motec also.

Everyone has their own opinions, I see 5+ motecs a week and every single time I wish it was a Vipec.

In this country the Motec has the #1 reputation. Its been doing the job well much longer then the Vipec / Autronic, Autronic is #2 here, and other ecu's are starting to pop their head out of the water.

IMO keep the motec, it does the job fine... IF you are going to buy another ECU then I would buy a Vipec or Link or Haltech.

  • 1 month later...

FYI Guys, I have both now :)

Motec is staying in the 1JZ T51R SPL Soarer and the Vipec will shortly replace my PowerFC in the Supra. I also scored a plug and play loom for The VL RB30-26 project so Winning all the way around :)

I need A / B Looms for the Vipec and an Air Temp Sensor AIT.... can anyone help? Pretty Please!

Going for 400rwkw in the Supra and the PFC won't cut it for my drag and anti-lag ambitions hehe.

I love the Motec, the software and the support, but I don't like paying through the arse for features that are ALREADY on the ECU.

I also like the LInk G4 Extreme interface so I copied the theme/layout over into the Vipec Software and voila - it works!

So someone please get back to me with pricing and availability on a A/B loom for the Vipec + AIT. I've been quoted around $300 or so delivered, but looking for a better deal or the Plug & Play harness for the 2JZ. Vipec say They they won't sell it separately, which is BS as I have a Vipec already.

Edited by Drift Motorsport

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I know this is an old thread but I have a particular attachment to the ENR34, so I don't think additional content hurts. For starters, I agree with everyone here in that the performance of a stock R34 GTR is a pretty low bar and one that you're going to spend a lot of money "matching". Now if you're willing to deviate from that template as your goal, you'll be much better off and enjoy the car much more. The engine in the NA R34s is a real kick in the nuts in terms of upgradability compared to previous generation NA cars. The NA heads on the RB2X NEOs have MUCH smaller intake port cross sections and are not compatible with any of the aftermarket forward-facing manifolds available for the RB25DET. This can be remedied with a RB25DET NEO head, but those are expensive relative to what they are. A full long-block from a turbo AWD Stagea is generally a better value and will run you about $4000 USD to get it to you. This will get you the stronger RB26DETT rods, as well. That would give you a base to build off of to be safe in the 400whp range. Not shooting for the moon, but if the stock R34 was your bar, this engine would buy you enough to be just North of stock GTR power. A forward facing manifold would allow for the easiest method toward using Bosch EV14 format injectors such as those from Injector Dynamics and FIC, to name a couple. People hate them because they're copies, but Greddy fakes can be had for around $300 USD. With what the fuel rail, regulator, injectors, and the rail adds, figure $2000 USD for the whole setup including the manifold. With the OEM brackets and a bit of trimming to the ends of the lower frame rails, the OEM intercooler mounting brackets can be used to mount an OEM GTR intercooler, or an aftermarket one made for a GTR. Those are handy vs a universale due to the angles that the end tanks have on them. Then your plumbing become super straightforward at that point despite having to cut a hole where the battery is an a matching one on the other side for the pipes. Battery can go to the trunk. I'd round up to a healthy $2000 USD here too (maybe even a tiny more) to allow for a nice aftermarket unit and some pipe fabrication. Or if you can find someone that's upgrading to something larger, the used market comes in clutch here for a decent savings. I won't even get into turbo sizing as that's something that would be for yourself to determine. HOWEVER, for the purposes of your stated goals, a Borg Warner 7064 with an internal wastegate would be a perfect spooler and would make stock GTR power easily. It would also bolt up to your OEM manifold (that would come with the DET you purchased a couple steps above) if it were ordered with a T3 flange. More with adequate fuel. If you can stick with the OEM exhaust manifold then expect to be in the whole about $6000 USD for decent turbo like the one suggested, a down pipe, new O2, and full exhaust to mate up, and upgrades to the integrated BOV in an EFR or a standalone BOV for a different turbo, as well as an aftermarket IWG (internal waste gate). Those last two are definitely optional and unnecessary. All of this stuff above does you no good without any way of tuning and or monitoring the engine. Bite the bullet on a standalone engine management solution. If your experience with wiring is limited, you're going to have to hand it off to someone else, though. Unfortunately, the adapter/patch harnesses available are typically made around the GTT which does not include AWD, and the GTR, which integrates into a lot of chassis features that aren't present in your wiring interface. So the ENR34 is the oddball. So you'll want to expand a bit on your selection and find an ECU that's capable of running the ATTESA pump also. I have a Link Thunder, but you don't need quite that much ECU to accommodate that. You WILL need someone with the know-how to tune it and code those features into whatever software it uses. And to wire it up. This will be your most significant expense. Call it $6000 USD with an ECU, an okay wiring job (no motorsport grade at this price), aftermarket triggers and R35 coils, and the time it takes to tune the ECU with added features (electronic boost control solenoid, MAP, IAT, the new triggers, and ATTESA) and don't be surprised if it's more if you want better work done. Grab a clutch made for any RB pull transmission R32/R33GTR made for the power handling capacity you're looking for. Budget $1500 USD for a new good one. That's about $20,000 USD for an engine you've upgraded yourself and had wired and tuned by someone else. That's no brakes (ENR34 brakes are pathetic), suspension (again, pathetic), or wheels and tires. So you're pretty spot on in terms of spending $30,000 USD extra on the car just to get it to perform a little better than a stock R34 GTR while looking like a bone stock ENR34 with some wheels and suspension mods. That doesn't include fluids, maintenance items, gaskets/seals, repairs needed or anything else discovered along the way. But you'll have a car you can take to the track and have fun without worrying as much about nicks and dings.  
    • Okay so, please read this. car started and ran fine. got my tuned ecu by RSenthalpy, did a bunch of pulls to test it out and finally drive the car after half a year of it just sitting and idling at most. Everything was good, thing ran flawlessly and had so much power, didn't feel slower than a Prius anymore. Parked it back and turned it off.  Next day, I install an AFR and start the car. Didn't wire anything to the ecu. Just gauge.  Car started, but died out in about a minute. I figured it was cause my car was on a lift and the fuel was really low and old. I add 5 gallons of fuel, still cranks but no start. I remove all AFR wiring (tapped into double din acc and power wires but there was a nest of wiring there so I was worried I messed something up. tried to put it back to how it was prior to afr install.) Still cranks no start. Changed spark plugs with brand new ones Changed fuel pump with a new one (verified working) Did compression test , compression came back all at 150ish. All fuses are good, Relay seemed good but ill double check by switching similar relays around. Verified MAF is working - Ended up getting curious as to why fuel pump is not priming when ignition is on, so I cut the fuel pump ground and power and connected them directly to a portable jumper. I also disconnected fuel line to fuel rail to verify fuel is being sent. So with direct jumper power, the fuel pump turns on and shot gas everywhere through the fuel pipe that I had disconnected, so ny doing that, I verified no clogs in fuel lines or filter. - Tried starting the car with that jumper directly wired to power and ground, but car still did not start. I'm guessing its a CAS issue but im a little scared to check it without messing up timing or anything else since I actually dont understand how to check CAS lol. If anyone has any other suggestions or recommendations , please let me know.
    • Hi all. I am aware there is lots of discussions about jacking points, where to lift the car and what not. But as usual just a lot of "in my opinion" and nothing definitive, and everyone does it in a different way. I want to hear from some experienced people on which points on the car it's okay/safe/recommended to lift the car using a four point hoist/lift. I will attach some images of my underbody. Sills are largely okayish, the driver side jacking point is pretty mangled though and it looks like the underfloor is slightly pushed in too, but I might be wrong. In the German Skyline forum, the consensus is to use the sidemember chassis rails in the front and the rear subframe? bushing in the rear. I know the manual says to never use the sidemember for loading but lots of folk do it and it was definitely done on my car too as they are slightly bent too. Based on the images, what points do I use to not make the already present damage worse? I'd use wood or rubber blocks to spread the load across a bigger area of course. Driver side sidemember and jacking point mangled one) https://imgur.com/a/eKjzrJX Driver side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/W3DWF1P Passenger side sidemember and jacking point https://imgur.com/a/65UvIJe Passenger side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/h3k7j53 We can also see some underbody rust but so far it all looks somewhat treatable and nothing that requires a Yoshida style restoration.
    • Have you put an aftermarket oil pressure gauge on and verified your oil pressure?   Noise being on the block, on exhaust side, how high up the block does it seem to be? It could be the VCT system getting cranky, especially if it's mainly at idle, and when warm, as that'll be your lowest point for oil pressure. Could be showing that oil passages / VCT solenoid are blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...