Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Morning all,

2 weeks ago i had my gearbox / clutch replaced and had the guys re-tune the car too as it had been over 3 years since my last tune, with another tuner.

The new dyno sheet showed the car at 193rwkw, which concerned me as my last dyno tune back in 2007 had me around the 220rwkw mark.

When i questioned the new tuner, he put the difference down to the fact others "tweak" their dyno settings to give off false readings. i had heard of people doing this in the past but surely 30 rwkw is quite a large "tweak" in settings. Isnt it?

I gave my new tuner the benefit of the doubt. However, the car feels much slower as turbo response times are now very laggy. At times it feels as if i am driving a NA car as i cant feel the punch of the turbo i once used to feel. The boost just doesnt put me back in my seat like it used to.

The tuner did carry on that the new tune is a "safe tune" but in all honestly the car felt quicker before i even had the Power FC installed.

Now on top of the above, the fuel economy has become very poor. Coming from a minimum of 350km a tank prior to this new tune, my first tank out of the workshop came to 190kms. Keep in mind the driving has been kept rather sensible as i am still wearing in my new clutch.

Am i right in assuming the tune is attributing to the poor fuel economy i am experiencing? Makes me wonder why this is happening as the car is noticably slower too.

Do you guys have any suggestions before i go back to these guys and complain? These guys are very well known in the industry and have a good name so i find it tough to go back to them and complain about their work results.

Current mods are :

3.5" turbo back exhaust

FMIC

K&N Air Filter

Apexi boost controller (high setting at 12 psi)

Walbro Fuel Pump

Power FC

Spitfire Coil Pack

Appreciate any advice guys, as i am at rock bottom at the moment as i have just spent over $3k to have my car eating more fuel and driving much slower.

Thanks

Con

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/337864-new-tune-resulting-in-30-rwkw-less/
Share on other sites

It can only be the tune or the car.....either way the dyno is there to tell you. The fuel consumption is not normal so just mention that and take it back to have it checked. The tuner can't fix it if he's not aware of the problem. You may kill two birds with one stone

Do you have a copy of the "old" tune? Then re-install those maps. Or the previous tuner should have a copy.

The economy - check "closed loop" has been turned on.

Driving / performance - maybe it's simply psychological, the number is lower so you expect the performance to be down as well.

thanks for the responses guys.

How do i check if "closed loop" is switched on? is this checked on the PFC hand controller?

AFRS?

BTW i spoke with my tuner breifly this morning and his advice was to continue driving the car for another week and monitor the fuel consumption as it could be a fluke. (sounds to me he couldnt care less TBH)

Edited by CK34GT

193rwkw is bang on for std turbo. mine made 192rwkw with a good tune

your economy should be 350kms to a tank and some dynos will give higher readings

ie moving the air temp sensor is enough to inflate your reading from 190rwkw+ to 210rwkw+ so take it with a grain of salt

and for what its worth your better of making less power and having a quicker car vs havingt more power on an inflated sheet

to check if 02 feedback is on

read the powerfc faq in my signature and use the online emulator also in my signature

if your economy is 190kms to tank its likely 02 feedback is off (turn it on)

Peak power sounds right but if the economy is that bad it is possible it is a sloppy tune hence the lack of response, feeling down in average power. Could take it back or take it elsewhere, bit of a gamble really as we have no idea who the tuners are.

if 02 feedback is working and turned on, you dont need to tune every cell to get good fuel economy

it certainly helps, but its not the be-all and end all if working 02 feedback is ON

if 02 feedback is working and turned on, you dont need to tune every cell to get good fuel economy

it certainly helps, but its not the be-all and end all if working 02 feedback is ON

how lean does the O2 feedback tune it anyway?

193rwkw is bang on for std turbo. mine made 192rwkw with a good tune

your economy should be 350kms to a tank and some dynos will give higher readings

ie moving the air temp sensor is enough to inflate your reading from 190rwkw+ to 210rwkw+ so take it with a grain of salt

and for what its worth your better of making less power and having a quicker car vs havingt more power on an inflated sheet

to check if 02 feedback is on

read the powerfc faq in my signature and use the online emulator also in my signature

if your economy is 190kms to tank its likely 02 feedback is off (turn it on)

From what i can see, i must check the 02H setter and make sure it is switched on right?

and can i change this from my PFC hand controller if it is turned off?

Cheers

193rwkw is bang on for std turbo. mine made 192rwkw with a good tune

your economy should be 350kms to a tank and some dynos will give higher readings

ie moving the air temp sensor is enough to inflate your reading from 190rwkw+ to 210rwkw+ so take it with a grain of salt

That is one area that I agree with. The car shouldnt be returning such a poor fuel economy. I had my gtst with a hi-flow and very similar mods making 230rwkw and I was always getting close to 500km/tank.

Something is not right, I have not the experience or knowledge to say what that is, and I would be getting the tune looked at. Maybe one of the experienced tuners on here could have a look at your tune file if you upload it?

ok just ran down to check the settings on th PFC....

Sensor Check Screen:

I found that only IGN and ECC was on (filled black circle)

Everything else was off (empty circle)

Function Select Screen (as below)

Boost Control, air flow warning, injector warning - OFF

Knock Warning & O2H F/B Control - ON

I dont get it, if O2H in the sensor check was off, why is the O2H F/B Control showing on in Function Select Screen.

How do i actually switch the O2H sensor on in the Sensor check screen - this should likely fix the fuel consumption problem right?

Edited by CK34GT
or most likely the tuner didn't give a rats arse about rows 3-15

This makes sense as only IGN and ECC (line 1 & 2 i see) is turned on and all remaining lines off.

Any thoughts on what this could mean?

What is the importance of lines 3-16 ??

Edited by CK34GT
02 feedback aims for stoich 14.7 by default

you can change it with datalogit

no, you can change which cells are trimmed under constant throttle, not how much they're trimmed by.

OP, he means rows 3-15 in the fuel map, nothing to do with the sensor screen. whilst on that screen tho, what does the o2 voltage show at idle?

for it to be using that much extra fuel just from the tune he'd have to go through every cell and richen them all up and take out loads of timing under light load, which would just be silly but you never know...

Unless the tuner is really SHIT i doubt they would go through and change everything to make it really rich...could be wrong.

Coincidence, but failed Fuel Pressure Reg?

Depending on how they can sometimes fail it could make the thing rich under low load and lean on power...or rich everywhere = sluggish.

Take it back and get them to SHOW YOU while cruising on the dyno that the AFR meter shows either 14.7 or 1.00....shouldnt be anything other than that....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...