Jump to content
SAU Community

C110 Coupe.


blk180
 Share

Recommended Posts

R180 to R200 is not a simple exercise. The 4 main bolt holes will need to be Lower, and more forward.

Bottom line is custom modification to the rear cradle.

I have a mate who has a R200 setup ready to go into a MR30, may be able to take some pics to clarify what is needed.

Secondly, how much power are you hopeing for to actually need a R200 diff??

oh and congrats on the project, much jealous

Link to comment
Share on other sites

R180 to R200 is not a simple exercise. The 4 main bolt holes will need to be Lower, and more forward.

Bottom line is custom modification to the rear cradle.

I have a mate who has a R200 setup ready to go into a MR30, may be able to take some pics to clarify what is needed.

Secondly, how much power are you hopeing for to actually need a R200 diff??

oh and congrats on the project, much jealous

and you forgot the axles, are you going to stay with the U-Joint type, or move to the CV-joint type ?

and it does look nice, are they new front guards ?

also I hope you have the glass to go with it.

Edited by noddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is Kents old car he brought another one to start again, im thinking of sticking with his RB26 and RB25 gearbox idea. Dont know much about diffs, kent showed me the custom rear from SWR which is what im thinking of grabing. Yer has been over a year looking now i also have a 4 door which will become a parts car now,

I have all glass and most parts i think.

Passin, i think the diffs are the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you work for WA railways Passin?

There's the right way, the wrong way,and the railway, which is usually worse then the wrong way.

Sweet find mate, love the shiny black vinyl interior, looks new?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does feel like we're getting railroaded presently but no blk180, i work for Alcoa World Alumina. We didn't strike in the end although the shift before me walked out for the full 12 hours. I still have to work Sun & Mon but will def post all info on Tues with pics. Nice project by the way and good luck with the rebuild. My 210 is now officially a V8 but no quicker than my ex triple webered 6. These 308's don't rev much but that'll soon be sorted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-44326-1285654594_thumb.jpgpost-44326-1285654302_thumb.jpgpost-44326-1285654696_thumb.jpgChanging from R180 to R200 LSD Longnose. The half shafts pictured are 260z ones, these replace the R180 shafts.

The moustache bar was custom made using the rubber torsion parts from the R180 moustache bar.The R180 is totally different fit for the R200.

The flange that joins the diff to the drive shaft was also swapped for a 260z one, just undid the 22mm nut (approx) with an impact gun and refitted the 260z one. It's not that hard to do, it's just sourcing a few parts and making sure you measure up right for the custom moustache bar.

From memory the R200 was $ 900.

moustache bar $ 80

Half shafts and flange $70.

Hope this helps to make up your mind on the swap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it a long or short R200 i also have been told that some come with 12 or 14mm bolts or something like that. Yer SWracing do the moustache bar for 240ks so will grab one of those. Really not sure what to do everyone telling me to go L28 so mite seach my local wreakers see if i can find one close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

R200 longnose - 10 or 12mm ring gear bolts. Only relevant if you're swapping internals around.

Longnose R200's were first seen in the the 260Z, and last seen in the R31 (and equivalent vintage alternative models). 3.90:1 LSD's were fitted to DR30's, 4.375:1 LSD's were fitted to HR31's and I think that 4.11:1 LSD's were fitted to Leopards (or something like that!)

Don't hold your breath on finding one these days and consider that lots of work has been happening (esp. in the US) regarding the use of ~2006 WRX VLSD/CLSD R180 centres in Nissan applications.

The R180 isn't weak, and is lighter than the 200. I would be passively looking for one, but I think that there is plenty of other work needed on the C110 before it's on the 'must have' list :P

(yes my 240Z and DR30 have R200 LSD's, so call me a hypocrite if you must!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...