Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi

ive been doing abit of research, and it seems like 100cell hi flow cats are the way to go if your running more then average power (300kwatw)

i know there are tons on ebay, but the quality is unknown, ive enquired about the CES 100cell 3" hiflow cat they have on offer and im waiting to hear back about flow/warrenty/etc, has anyone got/used a CES cat before ? how did you find them?

also looked at afew catco metal cat ones from justjap but they are 200cell. how much power can you make with a 200cell 3" cat before you need to upgrade? is there reallllyy that much of a power differnce between a 200cell and 100cell ?

i just want to do it once do it right, dont want to keep changing cats becuase they collapse after afew months, or find they are restricting flow

any helpful information would be good !

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/338388-upgrading-my-cat/
Share on other sites

300rwkw = 4" cat at least.

I cannot see a 3" honeycomb cat flowing enough. I can feel a minor different with my 4" CATCO cat with a 3.5" exhaust/280rwkw.

It's not major, but its noticeable none the less.

I'd be going with a big 4.5" CAT personally having doing it again.

My front pipes merge into 3" collector and my cat back is also 3", can an exhaust place modify a 3.5" or 4" cat down to 3" flanges? That way the internals are huge and flow more ut will fit my system perfect ?

Cheers

hi

ive been doing abit of research, and it seems like 100cell hi flow cats are the way to go if your running more then average power (300kwatw)

Less cells = less surface area for catalyzing = bigger holes. More flow at the expense of less effective catalyzing. At some point the conversion will stop being legal.

I have a metalcat cat (6" body, no idea what the in/outlets are supposed to be but probably 3.5"). I would guess it's 200cell as I don't think they had 100cell then.

For what it's worth it's been under the car for a few years, been through many track days and a couple of intercooler-pipe-blew-off

fireballs that destroyed the car's glasspacked mufflers.

I recently pulled it off the car and while a little black, it seems to be in perfect working order. Can't ask for more than that.

Cheers,

Saliya

Less cells = less surface area for catalyzing = bigger holes. More flow at the expense of less effective catalyzing. At some point the conversion will stop being legal.

I have a metalcat cat (6" body, no idea what the in/outlets are supposed to be but probably 3.5"). I would guess it's 200cell as I don't think they had 100cell then.

For what it's worth it's been under the car for a few years, been through many track days and a couple of intercooler-pipe-blew-off

fireballs that destroyed the car's glasspacked mufflers.

I recently pulled it off the car and while a little black, it seems to be in perfect working order. Can't ask for more than that.

Cheers,

Saliya

what sort of power are you making with the 200cell metalcat?

As usual I see lots of confusion on cat sizes.

Most people take "5" cat" as having 5" flanges, me included. Where as people are refering to the actual body of the cat. It could have 2" flanges for all we know.

The body is also important, the larger the body the larger the cell size at a given count. A 5" body with a 200 cell count will flow worse than a 4" body with a 100 cell count etc.

I think people in the know need to be more specific when stating figures with cats.

what sort of power are you making with the 200cell metalcat?

1 power run @350rwkw before the dyno overheated.

I intend to visit another dyno with a slightly-different setup sometime soon (same cat / similar exhaust).

Will remeasure and repost.

Cheers,

SW

I've got a Xforce "highflow" cat, and i just found out they are 500cpsi... shit!

anyone used one of the ones floating around ebay?

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi...e=STRK:MEWAX:IT

Yep, i have bought 2 now. Mine is flowing great, not sure about the emissions though. I cut the inlet back to make it 3.5 inch.

post-63525-1285751322_thumb.jpg

should probably make sure it's emissions legal, otherwise you may as well run a decat ;)

They apparently meet euro3 standards, what else can you go by? Stops the smarter cops shoving something up there and finding the hollow pipe I guess.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you tried another indicator stalk? Sometimes these go bad and cause issues.
    • They're so beautiful 馃槏
    • Early last week, I became concerned that the car was feeling....slow. Most of my driving is commuting to/from work and there are few opportunities to get up it and convincingly make boost/power. It drives in vacuum almost all the time. But when you do occasionally get an opportunity, and.... it takes a little longer to start making power, and then there's not as much as you'd expect, and then you run out of road anyway and have to bottle out - it can be hard to be convinced that there's something wrong. But by the end of the week I was pretty convinced. Made an effort to get a decent test run. Took bloody forever to come up on boost and when it did it would only make about 50 kPa of pressure. There was no black smoke, no noise of a boost or exhaust leak, no evidence anywhere of an intercooler hose clamp being sloppy enough to let air escape. So.... not that sort of problem. Brainstorming led to thinking that the boost controller's solenoid might have failed in some way. No active boost control would just give wastegate pressure, which I was more or less getting, and the laggy behaviour could just be "normal" shitty boost response from an uncontrolled highflow. But a little extra 3rd party brainstorming led to the thought that the actuator circlip might have jumped off leaving me with a bluetooth wastegate. So, on Friday, off comes the stock heatshield (which is an annoying enough job on its own) to reveal - yup. WG is wide open. And.... it won't come back. It is jammed in the dump. Put the rod back on with a new circlip and tried driving it to get it hot in the hope that the capture was from thermal effects having been blown into the dump when hot and since cooled. Nope. Won't move, even with screwdriver mediated force when hot. Ran out of time to play. Came back to it yesterday. Unbolted the dump. Was lying under it with the dump jammed up against my guts undoing the bottom 2 bolts. Got them most of the way out and gave the dump a serious heave. It didn't noticeably move, but there was a satisfying "plink" noise from up to. Shuffle out and sure enough, gate is now closed. Nevermind that there was still the better part of an hour after that required to put it all back together. f**ken cars.
    • For your application, where you'll be at that 1/2" size or perhaps larger, yeah, excellent. Although not if you need a tight bending radius anywhere, because the corrugated stuff is not anywhere near as flexible as rubber/teflon cored stuff. But for turbo oil lines? No. Too big. They just don't do the corro stuff down at the ~1/4" ID size that you'd want, and if they did the OD of it would probably be a bit too fat for fitting it into the tight spaces available. I use hoses like that all the time for fuel gases (LPG, NG) and liquid fuels (HFO, diesels, waste oils). When we did the London Olympic cauldron, with the 204 individual burners on it, we had miles of the stuff (although a lot of that was teflon core). A bunch of that crap is still cluttering up the workshop, more than 12 years later!
    • Would something like this be an option  https://processhose.com/products/configurable-metal-hoses/1-2-in-t316-stainless-steel-annular-corrugated-configurable-flexible-metal-hose-assembly-with-ends-t304-single-braid-masterflex-af5550.html I'm looking at this for replacing the OEM EGR when installing a aftermarket intake plenum 
  • Create New...