Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all,

just picked up my car from being tuned.

have put a forged 25 into it and running a gt3076r with the .60 front and .82 ext gate rear.

high mount manifold with a 38mm gate running off it.

fueled by a gtr lift pump fot surge tank to 044 external.

740cc injectors

tomei poncams, gtr valve springs.

afm is a z32 which is now located in the cooler pipe infront of the plenum

plazmaman plenum with stock TB

now i have it running on e85 and a eboost controlling 15psi flat.

i made 282rwkw.

i previously made 279rwkw on 16psi on bp98.

my question is, should i see better results than this?

i know the plazmaman and poncams wont give me more figures but better low down/mid range.

your thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/338436-got-my-car-running-e85-gurus/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

E85 generally should see 30-40rwkw gain on most street style setups.

That's the gain I've seen across what, 30 or 40 cars now and seems about "norm".

Either way though you need more boost in there, a 3076 isn't doing much @ 16psi on a 2.5ltr. 20-22psi is when the show will start.

E85 generally should see 30-40rwkw gain on most street style setups.

That's the gain I've seen across what, 30 or 40 cars now and seems about "norm".

Either way though you need more boost in there, a 3076 isn't doing much @ 16psi on a 2.5ltr. 20-22psi is when the show will start.

I concur, which doesn't normally happen with me and Nismoid...

15psi is rather homosexual for a built motor, its weak sauce even for a stock motor

hey all,

just picked up my car from being tuned.

have put a forged 25 into it and running a gt3076r with the .60 front and .82 ext gate rear.

high mount manifold with a 38mm gate running off it.

fueled by a gtr lift pump fot surge tank to 044 external.

740cc injectors

tomei poncams, gtr valve springs.

afm is a z32 which is now located in the cooler pipe infront of the plenum

plazmaman plenum with stock TB

now i have it running on e85 and a eboost controlling 15psi flat.

i made 282rwkw.

i previously made 279rwkw on 16psi on bp98.

my question is, should i see better results than this?

i know the plazmaman and poncams wont give me more figures but better low down/mid range.

your thoughts?

Same Dyno? Seems about right for that turbo and boost imo

are the injectors holding it back from more boost? ( i don't know a great deal about E85 , i'm asking because i'll be building something similar)

Exactly, I wouldnt think 740cc injectors would be holding you back! Joeyjoey... has 320rwkw with E85 on 555cc injectors (pretty sure anyway). What duty cycle are the injectors running at?

i didnt ask % but he said theres a LITTLE room to play.

i did ask for a SAFE tune, and i emphasized the SAFE...

i think afr's are 11.5 ish?

i forgot what the sheet said.

Ye i was gonna say also 740's shouldn't be maxed out @ those power figures regardless of a safe tune or not...

AFR's for E85 is not the same as AFR tuning for PULP.

11.5 is ridiculously conservative.

Ye i was gonna say also 740's shouldn't be maxed out @ those power figures regardless of a safe tune or not...

AFR's for E85 is not the same as AFR tuning for PULP.

11.5 is ridiculously conservative.

So you're saying for e85 AFR's of 12 flat are quite conservative?

What's a good AFR to tune for with e85?

12-12.3 is what a friend of mine tunes E85 at, and by no means is that 'on edge' either.

Apparently much either side of that and it doesnt go so well anyway.

11.5 is certainly on the side of really safe - its probably even perhaps possibly why power is down, a built motor shouldnt be sitting there IMO.

not even that. e85 loves being rich, seen heaps of cars make more power going richer. most recent one that comes to mind was an R35 that kept gaining power as it was fattened up near 10:1 (on a lambda scale calibrated for petrol obviously). i *think* with E85, EGT's come into it more. its not balancing A:F ratio and hp, but EGT's sort of make it 3 dimensional if that makes sense?

not even that. e85 loves being rich, seen heaps of cars make more power going richer. most recent one that comes to mind was an R35 that kept gaining power as it was fattened up near 10:1 (on a lambda scale calibrated for petrol obviously). i *think* with E85, EGT's come into it more. its not balancing A:F ratio and hp, but EGT's sort of make it 3 dimensional if that makes sense?

Mine blows the spark out at 10.5, although I am running 1.1mm gap on the plugs. No black smoke of course but a strong ethanol smell, and im sure its not good for the cat I just put in. (for some stupid reason)

Remember there's more oxygen in the fuel, so rich should still make good power.

12-12.3 is what a friend of mine tunes E85 at, and by no means is that 'on edge' either.

Apparently much either side of that and it doesnt go so well anyway.

11.5 is certainly on the side of really safe - its probably even perhaps possibly why power is down, a built motor shouldnt be sitting there IMO.

True, 12+ is fine. i tune in lambda though so 0.84 on E85. We have found atm that pump e85 is a little more like e75 so we fatten it up abit we are seeing a 0.5-0.7 jump in afr or 0.05 lambda towards LEAN when refilling with e85 so be aware.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 2 does "sort of" applies, maybe......but looking at what parts would be needed for the swap to get engineered, registered, and insured, and basically that's everything under the car, the modifications the make it legal would be problematic and horrendously expensive, all for a street car that just cruises around and hits a few twisty roads on the weekends Also, from looking at the NSW rules and Regs, with all modifications that is required just to make the car safe and not twist itself to pieces, and then actually get registered for street use, may still be impossible nowadays As for 1, when you add in a fresh engine, fresh transmission, rear cradle and diff, tailshaft, suspension, brakes, cooling, and all the other fabrication required, your probably looking at up to $100k to do it right, all for a 20 year old MX5 that is over engineered and you would never be able to actually use the power it has on the street, much like your beastie, which I love, but you actually track that thing and can use all of its powers in anger, in a safe environment  Hell, the old Bogan Cruise Ship had more power than I could use on the street, and in hindsight, I went a bit silly on that thing, it didn't really need the 500hp it had for what I actually used the car for, it was fun, but basically unusable on the street if you value your licence  As for cams, yeah, I'll probably book it in for them to get installed and tuned soonish, like next month after MX5 Mania are back at work....... and yes, I've already sent a email to bin the turbo quote and quote instead to install cams and a new Fluidampr balancer that will suit the 2.5 better than the OEM 2.0 balancer that is swapped over for the 2.5 install, as the balancer needs to get pulled to time the cams it's a while your in there sort of thing I did think a bit about flex fuel for a laugh, but being na, and no where really around locally anymore to get E85, I've binned that idea, so no sweet sweet corn smells are set for the car I wish E85 was more of a standard fuel, it's better for the environment, better for tuning, plus that sweet sweet smell we all love As for fitting in the family, that's not needed, as everyone in the family already owns a car that can seat 5 humans comfortably enough, the MX5 is "my toy" As for buying a car that is already built, nah, I would rather pick and choose my parts, I enjoy the process, and in the big picture, the additional cost is well worth the enjoyment, and the occasional frustration, I get out of doing it, albeit with other people spinning the spanners, and me, just paying the invoice 🤣
    • Excuse me, but 2) does apply 1) Would also apply if you consider how much is spent in the alternatives. Also there's the option of 3), buy one pre-built that you can put your family in (it's me, it's my car)   That said, I went on a ~500km drive the other day. I didn't use anything more adventurous than 3rd/4th gear at about ~3000RPM and 50% throttle and I was going as fast as anyone has any sense doing on a public road, with enough grip to the point where I didn't want to go any faster. I was obviously under the limit of the current car etc etc. MX5 with 2.5 N/A to achieve the same speed would be more fun for any road scenario. Maybe consider cams. I wouldn't boost it. The use case is just not there and it won't actually make the car more enjoyable unless you really do plan on wringing gears from 1st to 3rd (at least) at 100% WOT on a public road to 150+kmh.
    • Great if: 1. You had all of the money for everything else that is required  2. Lived in a country where you could actually do this and drive it legally on the road Sadly, neither applies to me As for the turbo, I am having second thoughts, mainly for engineering/registration legality reasons and insurance  Not saying I've finished doing stupid things that I probably should do to the MX5, but boost, and V8 engine swaps isn't on the cards Strange, but true 
    • I like this page, better than that silly turbo kit   https://v8roadsters.com/product-category/engine-conversions/engine-conversion-lsx/engine-conversion-lsx-nc/  
    • That would be my Shoei helmet
×
×
  • Create New...