Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

From wiki (but significant figures improved):

Table:

The following table shows the range of air fuel ratios typically used for burning gasoline, E85, and pure ethanol (E100) under an assortment of assumed operating conditions:

post-23086-1285738056_thumb.jpg

This seems to back the testing we have done, if you read my previous post (page 1) we are tuning E85 to around 0.84 lambda (12.4-12.5 afr).

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It seems I am the only customer of Springvale Caltex so I dont think it will be a problem for quite a while. I hope the stuff doesnt go off like petrol...

If I set the winter blend for around 11.5 it should work out around 12.0 - 12.2 on e85, that would be fine right?

how do you find the springvale caltex? thats literally 2kms from my place but i was thinking of going southland stuff for more consistency when i eventually get around to getting a retune.

how do you find the springvale caltex? thats literally 2kms from my place but i was thinking of going southland stuff for more consistency when i eventually get around to getting a retune.

Other than the price fluctuating, its a great fuel. They may stop the pump and ask if your car is suitable over the loudspeaker though. My car wont start well on the southland e85, Caltex no issues. Obviously wont be a problem once the weather warms up.

You should be able to tune rich enough on the e70 to run safe when they switch the mix. I will let everyone know if my wideband shows any change.

Other than the price fluctuating, its a great fuel. They may stop the pump and ask if your car is suitable over the loudspeaker though. My car wont start well on the southland e85, Caltex no issues. Obviously wont be a problem once the weather warms up.

You should be able to tune rich enough on the e70 to run safe when they switch the mix. I will let everyone know if my wideband shows any change.

is it hot or cold your issues? i found a trick with the other E85's to start even on a key flick when cold.

is it hot or cold your issues? i found a trick with the other E85's to start even on a key flick when cold.

Cold start mate, I have added fuel and leaned it out with temp adjustment but the only thing that seems to help is 10 degrees advance on the timing. I dont like the knock I get though with no oil in the bearings.

Trade secret or you willing to share? ;)

This seems to back the testing we have done, if you read my previous post (page 1) we are tuning E85 to around 0.84 lambda (12.4-12.5 afr).

Yep, I sure did. I was just adding some theory to your results to confirm. Also liked that you used lambda :) (your AFR would be more like 8.2 though ;) )

Also you mentioned you can add 5 degrees after optimum with no gain - I assume with no ping also. Would you consider this another example of the larger optimal timing window with E85 - a safety feature if you use the lowest advance that gives maximum torque?

Edited by simpletool
Yep, I sure did. I was just adding some theory to your results to confirm. Also liked that you used lambda :) (your AFR would be more like 8.2 though ;) )

Also you mentioned you can add 5 degrees after optimum with no gain - I assume with no ping also. Would you consider this another example of the larger optimal timing window with E85 - a safety feature if you use the lowest advance that gives maximum torque?

im not sure if your aware but if you leave the AFR gauge set to petrol it will read the relevant AFR's i posted above, it will only read 8.2 AFR if your set (most wont change it as its confusing) it to alcohol or e85 so the 12.5 etc are usable as a reference. I dont like it though so Lambda for me.

im not sure if your aware but if you leave the AFR gauge set to petrol it will read the relevant AFR's i posted above, it will only read 8.2 AFR if your set (most wont change it as its confusing) it to alcohol or e85 so the 12.5 etc are usable as a reference. I dont like it though so Lambda for me.

yea thats true when you convert the numbers it still ends up being almost the same number in AFR as gas on a gas gauge.

Yeah I know it will say 12.5 on the gauge if it's calibrated with a different fuel and used with another. That is my point exactly. It's the wrong scale. The lambda is still correct but the Air Fuel Ratio isn't correct. I mean people aren't using anywhere near a ratio of 12.5 air to fuel. It's just going to confuse people.

If people had a temperature gauge that read kelvin and Fahrenheit and Celsius but the Fahrenheit was calibrated with the wrong scale (ie. Celsius standards by accident because nobody bothers to calibrate with Fahrenheit, hence the wrong offset) would they still give the reading in the wrongly calibrated scale? Or would you just give it in kelvin - since that scale is correct and a universal reference. What people are saying in this thread is the equivalent of saying that 293K equals 20°F, which is doesn't. 293K equals 20°C. And people using the correct calibration or factoring for it will wonder why it doesn't make sense (sure most will work it out). Same thing here, if people search through theses threads in 6 months time (which most SAU members like people to do) and think "ohhh....Status tuning (who honestly by all accounts seems to be an excellent member and tuner with great knowledge of RB and SR engines) says he gets best results at 12.4:1 with E85. Why doesn't mine work like that."

IT also makes no sense to injector flow rates.

I'm just trying to save confusion and keep SAU a good reference for people. Currently it looks a touch silly to be using the wrong scale and saying that's OK since most people will use the wrong scale anyway.

Edited by simpletool

So I should get out the laptop and recalibrate the wideband to display afr's for ethanol when I change to e85, (which is the flick of a switch) and then recalibrate my brain to read it at wot? :D

I probably should have started with lambda to get used to it as that is what the sensor is reading anyway, unfortunately lambda just confuses me more.

The truth is even afr's for ethanol wont be accurate as it is a mix of around 70% for me atm.

richer or leaner?

come on buddy fess up :P

i havent touched a e85 car yet but be good to know, if its richer then have you tried pre start priming?

I manually pre prime mine with 98, button on the dash to a one litre canister in the engine bay. I was going to try and automate it but its only needed when the temperature is below 12 degrees or so.

Trent, I dont think the emanage can adjust for cranking, only temp compensation, I thought perhaps I should just run it rich until the temp comes up. I added 20% and it didnt seem to change much, are you talking about putting twice the cranking fuel?

richer or leaner?

come on buddy fess up ;)

i havent touched a e85 car yet but be good to know, if its richer then have you tried pre start priming?

rish as f*ck with no timing is what i've read from a very reputable tuner out of the states. he says up to 50% more fuel than from a petrol tune, and 0 or 5 degrees timing

Any body been monitoring EGT's with increased compression ratio's while using E85 - have seen some pretty interesting results on aspirated engines in regards to reduced EGT's with higher compression - would expect the same on boosted engine tho havn't proved it yet.

Any body been monitoring EGT's with increased compression ratio's while using E85 - have seen some pretty interesting results on aspirated engines in regards to reduced EGT's with higher compression - would expect the same on boosted engine tho havn't proved it yet.

I run 21 psi on a tiny stock housing, my egt's remain at 600 degrees (turbine outlet) no matter what I do on the dyno. Best bet would be to run an NA engine on e85 at 20psi, should hold the temps much better. Does this mean the ethanol burns much quicker than 98 under high boost?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...