Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Wow, that's amazing!!

Stephan Winklemann, President and CEO of Automobili Lamborghini said of the Sesto Elemento, "It is our abilities in carbon-fibre technology that have facilitated such a forward-thinking concept, and we of course also benefit from the undisputed lightweight expertise of Audi AG. Systematic lightweight engineering is crucial for future super sports cars: for the most dynamic performance, as well as for low emissions. We will apply this technological advantage right across our model range. Every future Lamborghini will be touched by the spirit of the Sesto Elemento."

I guess the Jota will have similar design features...here's some more official shots:

34_front2.jpg

34_rear2.jpg

side2.jpg

interni_2_mid2.jpg

interni_1_mid2.jpg

Edited by dark-knight
Lambo design team manager to subordinate:

"Bet you can't design a car entirely with a ruler..."

I am honestly suprised that the wheels are not shaped like 50c coins

lol

imho it is ugly and will certainly be well overpriced just like everything else the italians make

edit: not to say it's not a nice drive of course... just ugly and italians annoy me :D

imho it is ugly and will certainly be well overpriced just like everything else the italians make

Seeing as it's a concept I doubt this will be going into production, it's more an example of what we're likely to see in future models. More to the point, when are they ever going to produce an underpriced Lamborghini? They're not really going for the average-income deomographic...

lol

imho it is ugly and will certainly be well overpriced just like everything else the italians make

edit: not to say it's not a nice drive of course... just ugly and italians annoy me :mad:

Steeringwheel is as predicted.

Anyone else noticed the rearview mirrors come out of the middle of the door?

Edited by person

It's a concept car, it's meant to be OTT! It's designed to give you an insight into where they're heading in the future.

I prefer my designs a little more organic, personally...

Mazda-Shinari-Concept-625x415.jpg

It's a concept car, it's meant to be OTT! It's designed to give you an insight into where they're heading in the future.

I prefer my designs a little more organic, personally...

Mazda-Shinari-Concept-625x415.jpg

If they did something about the front end that would be a nice looking car.

That Lambo is ugly... but it is beautiful... although the interior screams of a mid 90's PC game.

Perhaps the Stealth Fighter type styling is so it can avoid "speed" radar guns?

Edited by iamhe77

I think it looks wicked!

lol

imho it is ugly and will certainly be well overpriced just like everything else the italians make

edit: not to say it's not a nice drive of course... just ugly and italians annoy me :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...