October Photo Thread

[Jay019]

i thought those tats were pretty nice.

not like this... http://ugliesttattoos.files.wordpress.com/...w=500&h=375

[alex182]

afternoon quickie. terrible photoshop.

Only been in this hobby for 2 months now (forgot to say in earlier post).

take a look at my DeviantArt gallery for all my pics. http://elementle.deviantart.com/gallery/

Edited October 28, 2010 by alex182

[MaTBoY]

Been busy in meetings and training all day.

D90

80-200mm ED

EXIF

Lambo

1/80

F/16

ISO 100

Focal 105mm

Distance (Guess) approx 40m

Ferrari 1/2 shot

1/200

F/13

ISO100

Focal 200mm

Distance 30m

R35

1/60

No IS or VR, no mono.

hope it helps some how

[MaTBoY]

You're own black heart owen. Next time i see u with ur mrs I'm gonna tell her you told us all you wanted to cut her back

I missed that sparkler graff shot from jay, it's mad! i like it. I'm plannin on going back to those walls and shooting them all for you when i head past them next time J.

[bnr#@]

Been busy in meetings and training all day.

D90

80-200mm ED

EXIF

Lambo

1/80

F/16

ISO 100

Focal 105mm

Distance (Guess) approx 40m

Ferrari 1/2 shot

1/200

F/13

ISO100

Focal 200mm

Distance 30m

R35

1/60

No IS or VR, no mono.

hope it helps some how

Thanks for that. Thats a decent effort to get the lambo THAT sharp at 1/80 with no IS

[oweban]

You're own black heart owen. Next time i see u with ur mrs I'm gonna tell her you told us all you wanted to cut her back

I missed that sparkler graff shot from jay, it's mad! i like it. I'm plannin on going back to those walls and shooting them all for you when i head past them next time J.

Haha, she knows how much I hate tattoos

(sorry to hijack thread, will take photos this weekend, that's the plan anyhoo)

[Jay019]

I missed that sparkler graff shot from jay, it's mad! i like it. I'm plannin on going back to those walls and shooting them all for you when i head past them next time J.

cheers man, i need to get out and do more, but my car has no rego and im pretty slack, lol. and cant wait to see your graff shots. seen some from south sydney that absolutely rock.

and todays effort, lol. self portrait...

spent so much time trying to get my timing right that i forgot to make sure the ISO wasnt too high. doh! i really should have got the G11 out for this, but seems the Lumix is always my first choice. ive grown to love it, warts and all, haha.

[MaTBoY]

No worries Serg, I got a few decent shots at 1/60 too, but the 80's and lower were sharper and nothing was really gained in the shot.

Jay, Try searching image galleries for 'Newtown' there's so much stuff there.

Owen, Hasn't she shown you her special tat?

A few more from the Creek, Pit shots this time.

R35 with great plates...

The getaway car...

More of the 430 Scud. This car gave me a hard on. Sounded so damn much like a ..... Ferrari, Tough Ferrari.

[FST513]

pr0n matty. So much pr0n.

Wow, i was right with the lambo Sif theres no gain by slowing your shutter past 1/80th! Massive gain. Go to 1/40th and you'll see the difference in motion blur and not want to go back to 1/80th

[NA_Goodness]

Nice wedding shots, Sidd! Those tats... om nom nom.

[GoldZilla]

Sweet shots everyone!!!!!! Nick, some awesome shots there!

Thanks man, some of those shots were hard to do because I was using the articulated screen to compose them, and trying to hold the camera still while pressing the shutter was a bit awkward

afternoon quickie. terrible photoshop.

Afternoon quickie? You're doing it wrong!!!

Great subject for a photo, but try composing using the "rule of thirds" and you might get a slightly better result. I love the vibrance of the purple.

[GoldZilla]

Matt, Kory's right about those shots being pr0n - I especially love that last one!

[MaTBoY]

cheers guys! it was an awesome find i was very happy when i saw them running around the track. if only it was like that every day.

i got off a few shots at 1/60 at that location and there wasn't enough detail in the background to warrant the loss of clarity on the car vs 80. there's only grass and water and the extra back blur didn't do much. if there was more in the background it probably woulda been different. I don't think i'd be very successful at 1/40 with no IS. I'll give it a crack next time i head down though. Always up for a challenge.

[FST513]

I don't use IS when panning remember

[ZENNON]

I'm not a fan of tattoo's either but I've had a couple of girl friends with tattoo's and I didn't feel like getting a knife and cutting it out of them!

[MaTBoY]

steady hands capt'n

[kuma j]

hey guys,

im pretty new to the whole photography thing, so i welcome any feed back you can offer, good or bad.

just a couple to get started,

[MaTBoY]

I like both your shots. good work.

first one, the light flare is a bit to much, i'd either work to reduce or eliminate it.

2nd one is nice too, good spot and great idea! read up on your bracket function. you could have bracketed, or taken a few exposures so you could throw in a bit more detail from the sky.

[kuma j]

I like both your shots. good work.

first one, the light flare is a bit to much, i'd either work to reduce or eliminate it.

2nd one is nice too, good spot and great idea! read up on your bracket function. you could have bracketed, or taken a few exposures so you could throw in a bit more detail from the sky.

Hey Matt thanks for the tips. i agree about the flare this was one of my concerns about the pic. is this something that could be eliminated while taking the photo or something i would fix when editing the photo?

in the second one i tend to agree with you,i think the sky needs a bit more detail, prob the only thing i would change. As im still so new to it all i need to getin the mind set that i can take more then one shot and edit them together to get the best result.

Im still thinking its a point and shoot and that close enough is good enough.

But hey still plenty of time for me to learn.

And once again. thanks for the tips.

John

[ZENNON]

I like both your shots. good work.

first one, the light flare is a bit to much, i'd either work to reduce or eliminate it.

2nd one is nice too, good spot and great idea! read up on your bracket function. you could have bracketed, or taken a few exposures so you could throw in a bit more detail from the sky.

not really sure why you have the or in there.. they are the same thing - or you mean he could have done the bracketing automatically or manually

ps dont think that photo even needs to be bracketed for more detail in the sky - if you want the clouds to be more visible just apply a gradient filter to that photo

Edited October 29, 2010 by ZENNON