Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys i know this has probably been asked before but couldnt really find anything

i am building a rb25/30 and am currently looking at a set of forgies to suit a rb30et with an advertised compression ratio of 8.5-1 when used with single cam head.

will this bring my compression down to about 8.2-1 with the rb25det head?

here is some specs on the pistons

Piston Type Forged Ring Set Part # C1686 Compression Height 32mm/1.261in Sizes Available: STD, 050, 1.00 Piston Crown Capacity 4.5cc bs150gtr_ecblank.gifRing 1 Ring 2 Ring 3 Dish Type Steel Nitrided

Barrel plain

Reverse torsional taper face scraper Duraflex 3 piece oil ring Bowl Depth 0mm/in Width 1.5mm/0.059in 1.5mm/0.059in 2.8mm/0..11in Compression Ratio 8.5 Depth 3.4mm/0.133in 3.8mm/0.149in 3.9mm/0.153in Piston Mass 322 grams (0.50) bs150gtr_ecblank.gif1.gif

2.gif

3.gif

Pin Mass 84 grams Pin Diameter 21mm/0.827in Pin Locking Device

Spiral Lock Clearance 0.12mm/.005in Skirt Coated No

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/338966-rb2530/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I work in a machine shop and I've done alot of measurements with my rb30/26;

using JE +0.040" (+1mm) pistons (rb26 10cc domed piston with rb30 piston pin offset) the piston still sat 0.030" (0.76mm) down the bore

you will most likely still need to grind both the block and the deck to get a reasonable compression ratio

Below is the formula (the numbers used are my measurements as an example)

Bore x Stroke

bore x bore ÷ 4 =

87 x 87 ÷ 4 = 1892.25

Answer x stroke x π (pie) =

1892.25 x 85 x 3.142 = 505363.2075

answer ÷ 1000 =

505363.2075 ÷ 1000 = 505.363208 = SV

answer x number of cylinders = cc

cc ÷ 1000 = litre

Head Gasket

Same formula as above though this part is quite often left out

gasket bore squared ÷ 4

87.3 x 87.3 ÷ 4 =1905.3225

answer x gasket thickness x π (pie) ÷ 1000

1905.3225 x 1.4 x 3.142 = 8381.132613

8381.132613 ÷ 1000 = 8.381133 [ + ]

Head Chamber CC

Using a burette cc the head, when I ground my rb26 head I ground off 0.010" which took out 1cc, and same when I took another 0.010". But after grinding another 0.040" It had taken another 6.4cc's out. in total I ground 0.080" off the head and it took out 12cc's

Piston Dome/Dish /dome with valve releifs

They can vary a lot, most piston manufacturers will say what cc they have

mine say 10cc (Dome [ - ]) (Dish [ + ])

Deck height

This is the measurement from the deck to the top of the piston (not top on the dome) when the piston is at TDC

If the piston is below the deck (0.3mm is an example as mine is 0)

bore x bore ÷ 4 =

87 x 87 ÷ 4 = 1892.25

= x deck to piston x pie ÷ 1000

1892.25 x 0.3 x 3.142 =1783.63485

1783.63485 ÷ 1000 = 1.783635 [ + ]

0 Deck height is 0

Piston above the deck (0.017"/0.43mm for this set up)

top measurement of the piston squared ÷ 4

86 x 86 ÷ 4 = 1849

= x piston to deck x pie ÷ 1000

1849 x 0.4 x 3.142 = 2498.10994

2498.10994 ÷ 1000 = 2.49811 [ - ]

Adding it all together

Head CC + Gasket volume

then the following options

+ Piston Dish

+ Piston below deck

- Piston Dome

- Piston above deck

for me

Head cc + Gasket - Piston Dome - Piston above deck = CV

54.4 + 8.381133 - 10 0 = 52.781133

CV + SV =

52.781133 + 505.363208 = 558.144341

Answer ÷ CV = Compression ratio

558.144341 ÷ 52.781133 = 10.574694

=

10.57:1

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/338966-rb2530/#findComment-5500595
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In a few years from now, you'll regret that. It'll eat away at you, knowing the truth of the ugly hiding beneath the beautiful exterior... 😛
    • I don't think the G2 profile is particularly dangerous for the engine per se, more just are you actually ok with the turbo lag trade-offs? If the answer is yes then go for it. I personally don't think I'd be ok with it because I spend so much time at lower RPMs and I really enjoy the feeling of being able to stay in 5th gear on the highway and just roll into the throttle to get boost. Or staying in 3rd gear on "gentle canyon cruises" without feeling the turbo lag too badly. The 525 pump should be able to run flat out on factory lines but I would bet the pressure drop from pump to regulator is quite impressive. I don't know how much it would be exactly but I've seen figures like 30 psi thrown around.
    • It's interesting seeing everyone talk about what level of risk they are happy to tolerate.  Building a GTR always has a level of risk, you could be that lucky guy that drops 20k on the engine build alone and still has the thing go pop on the dyno. Life is fun like that.  The way I see it, the thing is a toy to be enjoyed. I'd be happy to turn up the power on stock motor and limit the risk with sensible tuning and engine protection. If it still goes pop, it is what it is. The car isn't a daily driver so it can happily sit while a plan is made to sort it out.  Given this thing will be a street car only, I really feel it's worth the (relatively small if managed well) risk to turn the power up to around 350KW on e85.  I don't think anyone getting into the skyline game now is doing it out of logic. Surely it is a purely emotional decision so I'm not sure how important it is to think about the engine build logically. The heart wants what it wants.  @joshuaho96 little note for Josh, I run my 525 pump flat out all the time and through the factory lines without any issues. (excluding the melting connectors, that's sorted now. we'll pretend it never happened lol)
    • But the Nexus S3 is very expensive and won't be as purpose-built for the application as a separate electronic boost controller :^) More seriously my pet issue here would be that the Walbro 525 running at 100% duty cycle is going to require more FPR than the stock setup can handle. I'm also pretty sure from what I've seen elsewhere you might want to slow down the pump regardless unless you're going to come up with some way of upsizing the fuel lines coming from the fuel tank. Factory 8mm fuel line doesn't actually flow very much if you want to keep pressure drop down between the fuel pump outlet and FPR. If you really want to "keep it simple" I would run only as much pump as you need and source a fuel pump controller to slow down the pump in the vain hope of being able to run stock-style FPRs which are pretty dinky. Or just use the HICAS lines and it should be mostly fine. OP should also really think hard about what profile they'd want out of the turbo. My pet choice here would be the G1 profile rather than anything higher power but YMMV. I already think ~stock turbo lag is pretty bad so I don't want to make it worse. In "gentle canyon cruising" I found that I spent a lot of time around 4-4.5k RPM. I also recommend DIYing labor if you're detail-oriented enough. Costs are high for labor + if you do it yourself you can be your own quality control.
    • GTSBoy is again on the money. My actual advice? Sell the car. (really). For what it's worth as is, you can sidegrade into something much better. If you care about function then this is the actual move. If you want a Skyline to perform, set aside about $100K to do it. This is NOT a typo. You will see right away these are two very different mindsets. Realistically we're talking full restomod for any Skyline still kicking around. Have an honest think about which one you are.. and what you want to do, and how much you want to invest in this (with no return).
×
×
  • Create New...