Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm one of the owners who is getting my car maintained by a non NHPC garage but am using genuine fluids in order to maintain my warranty. It's time to do my diffs and I can either buy the factory specified SAF-XJ 75W-140 for $60 for 500 ml from the local BMW/AMG dealership or else purchase 20 litres for $567 from Supercheap Auto. They don't sell it in smaller quantities. Trouble is 20 litres will last me around 270,000 kms based on the standard service intervals of 30K and 2.2 litres for both diffs so if anyone local wants 10 of my 20 litres I'll be happy to sell it on to you at what I paid for it.

Just out of interest, Nulon specify their 80W140 gear fluid for the GTR and appear to be happy to provide a warranty in case Nissan fails to honour the warranty as a result of them blaming the Nulon for the failure. Interestingly the Nulon says it's a 100% synthetic but I have been told that it's really a highly refined mineral oil. I'm no chemist so don't quite understand the ins and outs of how they can claim that its synthetic when it isn't. Either way I'd rather just go for the recommended stuff than stuff around with that whole blame game process if something was to go wrong with the diffs.

Edited by fungoolie

nulon have a habit of claiming their fluids are full synth when they're just a GrpIII oil - their argument would be that it's "close enough" to a full synth.

i'd stay clear of Nulon, especially for a R35

  • 5 months later...

motul factory fill diff oils in japan for the r35 GTR greatly increase's lsd performance

read more

http://www.nismo.co.jp/en/products/competition/of/competition_oil/lineup/75w140.html

Motul manufacture Nismo oil and all the rnd is done through the gt500 Nismo\Motul GTR

order only through most good performance workshops around Australia

  • 3 weeks later...

motul factory fill diff oils in japan for the r35 GTR greatly increase's lsd performance

read more

http://www.nismo.co....eup/75w140.html

Motul manufacture Nismo oil and all the rnd is done through the gt500 Nismo\Motul GTR

order only through most good performance workshops around Australia

Yes but at the expense of this:

" When using this oil, LSD efficiency will be greatly increased (with especially good high-speed performance), but there will also be greater wear on the LSD's internal clutch plates. Please be aware of this before purchase."

and this:

  • This oil was developed for high-intensity competition driving. Please note the following two points before using this oil:
  • 1. Except in the case of the Nissan GT-R (R35), this product is not covered by Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. warrantees.
  • 2. When this oil is used, it should be changed every 3,000 kilometers.

So pretty much track use only? And has Nissan confirmed these warranty claims?

Edited by fungoolie

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...