Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

my desktop computer at home overheats sometimes and lags a lot, so i was thinking of improving the cooling system to improve perfomance. while i was researching what kinds of cooling i should get, i remembered that cars have small computers in them too. theoretically cooling the ECU should improve vehicle performance. i dont think it would improve engine power much - if at all, but perhaps it could aid in accuracy and responsiveness of other ECU controlled devices such as ABS, traction control, electronic 4-wheel-steer etc...

but then again, do ECU's heat up at all???

i guess im looking for feedback from somebody who knows a bit about ECU's - aftermarket or not, skyline or otherwise. but everybody's opinion is welcome ;)

im not taking this seriously, im just bored and have money to blow :Pliquid-cooling-pc.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339754-ecu-perfomance/
Share on other sites

Electronics whether they be car or home computer will happily operate within a certain thermal envelope. The more processing you do the more heat is generated, but modern manufacturing processes means this heat output is reduced compared with older technologies (for the same amount of processing power).

Car ECUs are not a particularly stressful thing these days. Therefore they will happily be passively heatsinked by their own metal enclosure and no additional cooling is required (and there will be no benefit either). Earlier ECUs were pushing the envelope, I believe the R32 GTR that won bathurst had an ECU cooled by the car's fuel (!!!) because they were obviously trying to make it do a lot of clever work with the technology available in the day. These days heat output is a non-issue.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339754-ecu-perfomance/#findComment-5488823
Share on other sites

Car ECUs belongs to embedded computer system while the CPU in your desktop falls under platform system, one of the main considerations when designing an embedded system is the heat output & power consumption as most embedded systems are designed to work in restricted areas (with little air flow) & sometimes on battery power. Hence most embedded processor have very low clock frequency (most are under 500Mhz compared to your Gigahertz+ desktop CPUs) & therefore would not get very hot during normal operating conditions since the heat generated is directly related to the operating frequency.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339754-ecu-perfomance/#findComment-5495715
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...