Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've spent a few days wrestling with this then thought, why not ask the brains trust?

Due to some financial difficulties and change of heart I'm thinking of selling my r34 gtt. There's nothing wrong with it, it's actually closer to my dream car at the moment than what I probably buy. I've only owned this and a '94 camry so it'll be good to get some variety. I love the power and the fun of it and will certainly buy another one in a few years, probably with some mods.

I love the r34, but it's too costly to justify for the time being, so I should be able to sell that, settle some debts, and but a mild-ish r33 or s14. What would you do? I know these are skyline forums but there's an awful lot of silvia owners on here too.

I guess the conditions for purchase are price (<10k) and power, will a silvia feel slower? Not sure how the power curves of skylines and silvias compare...

Thanks for the help :D

Edited by Galois
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339956-new-jap-car/
Share on other sites

if you can in any way get a s14 s2, id say get that, that is a hell of a lot of fun to tune and work on, s13 is too old and s15 is tooo much.

other than that, r33 looks like a mangled UFO with a rb25 engine in it plus everyone has one.

if you dont care for a cars value, i would definitely say buy a xr8 or a ss, that sound makes the straight sixes sound like a fart.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339956-new-jap-car/#findComment-5491376
Share on other sites

Which would you suggest for say 9k mad? Was the 180sx ok for a daily or a bit more work than the r33?

both were daily's. both fine for that, however the r33 was a smoother ride than the 180sx and the extra torque down low was nice too.

as for the ss/xr8 option, you would really need to take them for a drive and see what you think. they are nice cars, but are different to the skylines/S series. they are very nice to drive on a daily basis though. seats are great, the reach adjust steering is also great if you are tall (can get the seat back far enough to have your legs comfortable and still reach the steering wheel nicely), and the low down torque is great. the other great thing about them is that you get back to enjoying owning a car again. i found that when i had my skyline any little noise that was out of place or problem with the engine, etc would upset me because i knew it was either going to be a pain to fix, or expensive to fix. when you own a commodore or falcon you forget about all that and as long as it's running on most of the cylinders you ignore any little problems and as my mechanic mate says "drive on brother". and if something does go wrong you know that there are thousands of spare second hand parts out there and every autoparts store will probably have new parts in stock and they will be cheap.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339956-new-jap-car/#findComment-5492220
Share on other sites

hahahaha "running on most of the cylinders", fk that's funny.

I agree, every little noise freaks me out on the 34.

I test drove a 5.0L xr8 last week and omfg it was slow!!! It was a '99 model I think and despite the extractors and twin 3" exhaust it didn't seem to go anywhere haha. Sounded amazing though.

Might test drive a 5.7 ss before deciding against an aussie sedan.

A mate of mine is strongly recommending a mid-90s lancer gsr with an evo 3 engine. Awd and manual are pretty quick apparently, though my perception is being entirely warped by my 34. Everything feels slow (and quiet!). Might end up getting a 33 for something with some grunt...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339956-new-jap-car/#findComment-5502542
Share on other sites

Id say even a 5.7 is going to disappoint. It did for me. and the price still being asked for them is a bit much...

it took 6 litres before i even thought it was comparable to the grunt of my R33. and they are still asking 30k+ for em!

Id say for your price indication you cant go past an R33 (if you actually like them, they seem to have polarising effect- love or hate).

I found that the s14's and 180sx's are a bit too thrashed now but the R33 holds up better over the years due to the higher price and the bigger 6 cyl not needing to be revved to the sky to get moving as in the sr20det's. Also looks wise the s14 n 180 are getting a bit dated, also smaller.

good luck :)

Edited by jjman
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339956-new-jap-car/#findComment-5503603
Share on other sites

you also have to remember that the torque profile of the big aussie 8's are totally different so they will feel different, possibly not as fast as they actually are. they tend to accelerate at pretty much the same rate from low in the rpm range to high rpm. they aren't like smaller cars where they accelerate slowly at low rpm and much faster at high rpm. v8's don't require you to scream their tits off to get anywhere like a small displacement engine. they will happily accelerate from 1500 rpm to 3000 rpm at quite a good pace. when i bought my 33 i was actually quite disapointed with how fast it was. it was stock and my manual v6 magna felt faster.

also worth driving more than one in case the one you drove was a dud.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339956-new-jap-car/#findComment-5504087
Share on other sites

Yeah, you're right mad. I was driving an au falcon with the 5.0L v8, which has peak torque at 3000. By comparison the 5.7L has peak torque at 1200 lol, so maybe the 5.0L is a bit of a dud itself...

I drove both 3.0L and 3.5L magnas on the weekend. I really liked them, they actually felt very similar in speed to the v8. Now I just have to find one in good nic.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339956-new-jap-car/#findComment-5504141
Share on other sites

Yeah, you're right mad. I was driving an au falcon with the 5.0L v8, which has peak torque at 3000. By comparison the 5.7L has peak torque at 1200 lol, so maybe the 5.0L is a bit of a dud itself...

I drove both 3.0L and 3.5L magnas on the weekend. I really liked them, they actually felt very similar in speed to the v8. Now I just have to find one in good nic.

Errrm...wat?

Feeling the same and actually being faster is a whole different ball game.

a VTII SS Auto will run 14.3 down the quarter, stock as a rock, AU2 and AU3 XR8s will be around half a sec slower than the commodore, so I have no Idea why you think they are slow?

And the GEN3 v8's make peak torque around 4000 in the VT2's and VX's

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339956-new-jap-car/#findComment-5504484
Share on other sites

Maybe I drove a dud, i was watching the speedo though. It really didn't feel fast (which soft suspension and seats etc that's expected), but it took longer than I'd have hoped to get to 90 from a stand still, I was rather disappointed.

I driven that route a thousand times in the last 5-6 years, and over a hundred in my r34.

All that said, if the car took a second longer to get to 90, that does feel like a lifetime when watching the speedo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339956-new-jap-car/#findComment-5504506
Share on other sites

i don't know what mods you have in your 34 (aren't you building up some big motor, or is that someone else?), but lets say (for arguments sake) you have the boost rasied up to 11psi or so, plus cooler and exhaust, your 34 would do the 1/4 mile in probably mid to high 13's. a stock late 90's and early 00's v8's will generally do the 1/4 mile in mid to high 14's, which put into perspective is pretty much what a dead stock r34 would do, but the v8's are harder to get off the line due to more torque causing wheelspin as well as much taller gearing (close to like taking off in second gear in a skyline).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339956-new-jap-car/#findComment-5504593
Share on other sites

It's fairly stock, boost is up round 12-13 though. There's either a leak in the bleed off tube from the stock boost controller, or the stock bc has been modified somehow. Not something I'm that worried about.

That second would make a difference on the track though.

Anyways, don't want to get into a v8 vs skyline argument, I don't really care (hence test driving both). I do care that the xr8 felt really slow, and looking down at the speedo, it was. Maybe that one was a tired old one, who knows. I did expect to be amazed at it's low down torque, but it didn't seem to have any or go anywhere. I certainly felt that torque wise the 34 was quite close below 3k rpm, and above the turbo seemed much faster and kept going to 7k.

If I was going to go v8, I'd want plenty of low down, and that xr8 was a let down.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339956-new-jap-car/#findComment-5504607
Share on other sites

It's fairly stock, boost is up round 12-13 though. There's either a leak in the bleed off tube from the stock boost controller, or the stock bc has been modified somehow. Not something I'm that worried about.

That second would make a difference on the track though.

Anyways, don't want to get into a v8 vs skyline argument, I don't really care (hence test driving both). I do care that the xr8 felt really slow, and looking down at the speedo, it was. Maybe that one was a tired old one, who knows. I did expect to be amazed at it's low down torque, but it didn't seem to have any or go anywhere. I certainly felt that torque wise the 34 was quite close below 3k rpm, and above the turbo seemed much faster and kept going to 7k.

If I was going to go v8, I'd want plenty of low down, and that xr8 was a let down.

yeah i'd say it was a dud, and if it had extractors and a big exhaust it had probably had a hard life and big exhausts can drop low end torque as well.

i've driven plenty of aussie 6's and only a few aussie 8's and even a stock aussie 6 below 3000rpm felt much much faster than my 33 did. come out of a corner at 20 or 30kmh in second gear and even with half throttle (or less) they would just pull nicely up to 60kmh.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339956-new-jap-car/#findComment-5504990
Share on other sites

Cheers for the explanation mad. I have to say the magnas were enjoyable to drive in that respect, they got to the speed limit easily in 2nd,3rd,4th and stayed there.

This was a manual xr8, and I tried to take off in second and had to give it a disappointing number of revs to do it.

All the while though it sounded great

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339956-new-jap-car/#findComment-5505267
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good afternoon Team , just a quick update on performance mods  Current Mods list (Installed) HKS - Power Editor (Came with the car) looks to be some kind of boost controller RV37 Skyline 400R (SKYLINE) | FUJITSUBO  - Cat Back  RV37 Skyline 400R (SKYLINE) | FUJITSUBO  - Front Pipe AMS  - INFINITI Q50/Q60 RED ALPHA COLD AIR INTAKE KIT AMS  - Performance Heat Exchanger Intercooler Not Yet AMS Alpha Performance Full Race Down Pipes  - to be installed in May 
    • I'd be installing 2x widebands and using the NB simulation outputs to the ECU.
    • Nah, it's different across different engines and as the years went on. R32 era RB20, and hence also RB26, the TPS SWITCH is the idle command. The variable resistor is only for the TCU, as you say. On R33 era RB25 and onwards (but probably not RB26, as they still used the same basic ECU from the R32 era), the idle command is a voltage output of close to 0.45V from the variable resistor.
    • It's actually one of the worst bits of Nissan nomenclature (also compounded by wiring diagrams when the TCU is incorporated in ECU, or, ECU has a passthru to a standalone TCU).... the gripe ~ they call it the TPS, but with an A/T it's actually a combined unit ...TPS (throttle position switch) + TPS (throttle position sensor).... ..by the looks of it (and considering car is A/T) you have this unit... https://www.amayama.com/en/part/nissan/2262002u11 The connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit, is the TPS (throttle position sensor) ...only the TCU reads this. The connector on the unit body, is the TPS (throttle position switch) ...ECU reads this. It has 3 possible values -- throttle closed (idle control contact), open (both contacts open, ECU controls engine...'run' mode), and WOT (full throttle contact closed, ECU changes mapping). When the throttle is closed (idle control contact), this activates what the patent describes as the 'anti stall system' ~ this has the ECU keep the engine at idling speed, regardless of additional load/variances (alternator load mostly, along with engine temp), and drives the IACV solenoid with PWM signal to adjust the idle air admittance to do this. This is actually a specific ECCS software mode, that only gets utilized when the idle control contact is closed. When you rotate the TPS unit as shown, you're opening the idle control contact, which puts ECCS into 'run' mode (no idle control), which obviously is a non-sequitur without the engine started/running ; if the buzzing is coming from the IACV solenoid, then likely ECCS is freaking out, and trying to raise engine rpm 'any way it can'...so it's likely pulling the valve wide open....this is prolly what's going on there. The signal from the connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit (for the TCU), should be around 0.4volts with the throttle closed (idle position) ~ although this does effect low throttle shift points if set wrong, the primary purpose here is to tell TCU engine is at idle (no throttle demand), and in response lower the A/T line pressure ... this is often described as how much 'creep' you get with shifter in D at idle. The way the TPS unit is setup (physically), ensures the idle control contact closes with a high margin on the TPSensor signal wire, so you can rotate the unit on the adjustment slots, to achieve 0.4v whilst knowing the idle control contact is definitely closed. The IACV solenoid is powered by battery voltage via a fuse, and ground switched (PWM) by the ECU. When I check them, I typically remove the harness plug, feed the solenoid battery voltage and switch it to ground via a 5watt bulb test probe ; thing should click wide open, and idle rpm should increase... ...that said though, if it starts & idles with the TPS unit disconnected, and it still stalls when it gets up to operating temperature, it won't be the IACV because it's unused, which would infer something else is winking out...  
    • In the context of cam 'upgrader' I mean generally people who upgrade headers/cams - not my specific change. I mean it makes sense that if I had a bigger cam, I may get more false lean readings. So if I went smaller, I'd get less false lean readings. To a point where perhaps stock.. I'd have no false lean readings, according to the ECU. But I'm way richer than stock. My bigger than normal cam in the past also was giving false rich leanings. It's rather odd and doesn't add up or pass the pub test. Realistically what I want is the narrowbands to effectively work as closed loop fuel control and keep my AFR around 14.7 on light sections of the map. Which is of course the purpose of narrowband CL fuel control. So if I can change the switch points so the NB's target 14.7 (as read by my WB) then this should be fine. Haven't actually tested to see what the changed switchpoints actually result in - car needs to be in a position it can idle for awhile to do that. I suspect it will be a troublesome 15 min drive home with lots of stalling and way too rich/lean transient nightmare bucking away for that first drive at 2am or whevener it ends up being. Hopefully it's all tune-able. Realistically it should be. This is a very mild cam.
×
×
  • Create New...