Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

DVS32R, yeah that's correct due to the mixture burning later in the power cycle, hence less time to cool before leaving the cylinder.

Also Stao, yeah he was deliberately keeping power low up top to conserve the engine. I agreed with this choice. This tune is somewhat mild all over though for the same reason.

The only way to decrease the forces acting against the wastegate+actuator is to either let off the throttle, or somehow restrict the pressure acting against the actuator. This is where a boost controller comes in.

In my scenario, adding a boost controller only increases boost between 4,000-5,000rpm after that it drops to the same level. This means that even with the actuator receiving almost no boost signal (boost controller) the wastegate flow is still pushing the wastegate flapper open and overpowering the actuator spring.

Also Stao, yeah he was deliberately keeping power low up top to conserve the engine. I agreed with this choice. This tune is somewhat mild all over though for the same reason.

My thinking at the moment is whats the point in having these large turbos and then restricting them to 280-290rwkw. We would be better off with more responsive turbos that still make 280-290rwkw peak.

The latest 3071 0.82 result from Hektik is excellent, full boost at 3600rpm and still makes 280rwkw.

Well I'll end up pushing the turbo into it's correct comfort zone when I get back from Europe later in the year....then when my engine goes pop, I'll be able to keep using it. For now, it's still perfectly good for what it's doing.

  • 1 year later...

Hi,

Did some search and decided to revive this thread. I am having boost creep. Its a hybrid R33 turbo with HT18 exhaust setup and bored out comp housing etc.

On the dyno it was creeping badly just off the w/g actuator, from say 8psi through to 18psi(very bad eh). The tuner used the Link G4 Boost controller to settle it around 16psi max creep.

I currently am using the stock actuator - 7psi. I realised that might be the issue? Trying to get a solid 16psi. On the dyno she made 275kw @ 17-18psi, but that was with the creep.

On the road its like this - 2nd gear.. I get 7psi instantly, but it starts to creep around 5k. All I want is a solid 16psi roughly from 3500-4000rpm. I have a feeling it may be the actuator thats the problem though.

I'm picking up an R32 actuator this sunday to see whether that helps(10psi). Any thoughts in my situation?

A stiffer actuator wont help the wastegate flow more which is what you need when boost spikes. Perhaps you can grind the hole bigger but then you will definitely need the larger actuator.

I can get that done no worries. Im assuming that at around 5k, the exh gases are causing the flapper to close due to the weak 7psi spring.

Its so frustrating on the road, it feels like driving a big laggy turbo, lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi. A little bit of an update. It maybe(hope not) looks like i would need a new tranny(it would be "maybe" a cheaper or better option anyway) So i need some info. I know i need a different propshaft(i can make custom one) LSD is not a problem cuz the engine will be still(for now) N/A RB20. So if i buy RB25DET NEO tranny...is there something else i need? I read something about push/pull type but i do not know if i need to "change" something or i can just plug n play onto my engine a go? Thanks for the advice  
    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
×
×
  • Create New...