Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My windows is playing up too...

Where can i buy in Australia the motor rebuild kit like this one

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/350Z-G35-Co...sQ5fAccessories

?

Using this guide to fix it

http://g35driver.com/forums/body-interior-...el-removal.html

Here is reset guide

Here are the instructions:

1. With the door open, lift up and hold the window switch until the window is completely closed.

* do not use the auto-up function and do not release the switch until the window is completely closed.

2. Get inside the vehicle and close the door. You need to close the door so the door switch is fully depressed.

3. Press and hold the window regulator motor reset switch. While holding the reset switch, press DOWN and HOLD until the window is all the way down.

* Do not use the auto close function and do not release the switch until the window is completely open.

4. Release the reset switch.

5. Then lift UP and HOLD the window switch until the window is completely closed.

* Do not use the auto close function and do not release the switch until the window is completely closed.

6. Open the door to release the door switch. The window glass should move partially down.

Here is a pic of where the button is

http://g35driver.com/forums/5349691-post270.html

not to sound harsh. replace the motor - it's a LOT easier and you will not be tearing the thing apart in 6 months time again. they are a maintainence item and need replacing every 4-5 years.

the info you posted is the reset procedure once you have replaced it.

not to sound harsh. replace the motor - it's a LOT easier and you will not be tearing the thing apart in 6 months time again. they are a maintainence item and need replacing every 4-5 years.

the info you posted is the reset procedure once you have replaced it.

Well its all done - until i get new motor or brush kit. I would have thought the actual motor being quite simple that it would be the brushes at fault? You saying Chris that even if i were to replace the brushes that its not good enough? Whats problems come up when brushes are new ?

Dont know about first time for passanger door but drivers door took 10mins to get to motor, 10mins to pull open, clean and put back together, 15 mins to finish again inc reset (didnt even really need to do it).. 35mins total not too bad.

Here is what my drivers side motor looked like b4 clean

IMG_0926.jpg

Drivers side motor after

IMG_0929.jpg

Passenger side after

IMG_0923.jpg

Also cleaned the contacts which before were so dirty you couldn't see the spaces in between...

IMG_0924.jpg

Edited by R6n350GT

I just picked up 2 BNIB OEM motors for $90ea ex USA. As Chris said, You'll be pulling them out again in a few months, this has been proven on G35 Driver. Might as well buy new and save the agro.

I just picked up 2 BNIB OEM motors for $90ea ex USA. As Chris said, You'll be pulling them out again in a few months, this has been proven on G35 Driver. Might as well buy new and save the agro.

Looking at the brushes are new ones much bigger? Can i ask why do the whole motor and not just brush kit?

Can you PM where you got them.

Thanks

Edited by R6n350GT
  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
    • I just try to entirely stay away from ladder now unless it's something basic maintained by electricians. Even then and to your point, it mostly ends up being blocks I wrote in structured text.  PLC's are slowly going towards C, C++ and C#. I just wish Allen-Bradley would jump on the bandwagon. 
×
×
  • Create New...