Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im setting up an e85 tolerant fuel system for my car to support 700hp, my plan was to run an 044 off an alloy surge but I wasn't sure if I should go stainless. What materials are people using for their e85 surge tanks, if alloy can it just be anodised, or is bare alloy fine?

Also, Bosch don't seem to recommend their pumps for ethanol, are there some available that are recommended? I'm running a Tomei 33 gtr pump at the moment with no issues, this will remain as the lift pump. Will one 044 flow enough ethanol anyway?

:devil:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/340495-ethanol-fuel-system/
Share on other sites

I definitely don't want to blow $1300us on a pump. The engine internals are costing less than that. Worst case twin bosch 044's would be $400.

Anyone running ethanol actually checked their alloy surge tank? I made a small alloy primer tank which has started corroding with just petrol in it.

I definitely don't want to blow $1300us on a pump. The engine internals are costing less than that. Worst case twin bosch 044's would be $400.

Anyone running ethanol actually checked their alloy surge tank? I made a small alloy primer tank which has started corroding with just petrol in it.

well how big is your turbo? how much psi are u running? these are things that i have come arcoss on my e85 set up. im currently on t72 with twin pumps with a relay and that is working on my set up at 600 hp.

well how big is your turbo? how much psi are u running? these are things that i have come arcoss on my e85 set up. im currently on t72 with twin pumps with a relay and that is working on my set up at 600 hp.

I havent built the engine yet. Its a VQ35, will most likely have eagle rods, CP pistons and a GT35 external gate. Im building this engine slowly as a backup, just trying to sort out the fuel system first.

it's extra money and effort to be legally able to recommend you equipment for ethanol. it needs to be tested an engineered etc. at the moment it's a small part of the market so companies aren't bothering.

anything that is methanol compliant should be fine

Im setting up an e85 tolerant fuel system for my car to support 700hp, my plan was to run an 044 off an alloy surge but I wasn't sure if I should go stainless. What materials are people using for their e85 surge tanks, if alloy can it just be anodised, or is bare alloy fine?

Also, Bosch don't seem to recommend their pumps for ethanol, are there some available that are recommended? I'm running a Tomei 33 gtr pump at the moment with no issues, this will remain as the lift pump. Will one 044 flow enough ethanol anyway?

:D

you are most likely going to have to have 2x 044 pumps and 1600cc injectors to give some headroom.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...