Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all, had my power fc pro installed and tuned today with tomei cam gears on my 33gtr, was excited to go and pick her up but...

result was only 201 atwkw, when i first bought the car i dynoed it and made 203.5atwkw

Is it just the tune that sucks, should i go back to the tuner and ask questions or go to a different tuner??

car is stock other then kakimoto exhaust (3 and abit inch) from dumps back high flow cat and boost restrictor removed

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/340971-tune-disappointment/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Does it feel better? Thats all that matters, different dynos can give vastly different readings, what was the difference between the first run on the current tuners dyno and the end result, thats far more important than a figure it got else where!

Does it feel better? Thats all that matters, different dynos can give vastly different readings, what was the difference between the first run on the current tuners dyno and the end result, thats far more important than a figure it got else where!

Didnt get the first run to compare as i dropped it off early,would it be worth going to a different dyno and having a run??

Feels more torquey and pulls harder (i think)

Had a look throught the RB26 dyno thread and there is a 33GTR with similar mods and has 264kw

Well 264 is probably a bit optimistic... depends on the dyno maybe +/- 15-20rwkw.

240rwkw would sound about right for the mod level.

As stated already - does it feel better? You should feel a noticeable difference. If so, then is mission accomplished IMO.

You don't wanna push stock turbos too hard anyway

Didnt get the first run to compare as i dropped it off early,would it be worth going to a different dyno and having a run??

Feels more torquey and pulls harder (i think)

Had a look throught the RB26 dyno thread and there is a 33GTR with similar mods and has 264kw

Thats all that matters mate, Dyno numbers are just numbers, Ramp rates, incorrect intake temps ect all make a difference, If you really want go and find a place that will give a better number....but it wont make it any faster :P

WHat boost are you running?

Boost is at around 14PSI

Well 264 is probably a bit optimistic... depends on the dyno maybe +/- 15-20rwkw.

240rwkw would sound about right for the mod level.

As stated already - does it feel better? You should feel a noticeable difference. If so, then is mission accomplished IMO.

I was hoping for around the 230 mark

only difference i believe i can feel is the torque, print out stated 588Nm

hard to judge unless you tell us what mods you have?? also what did your tuner say? did he have any comments?

Mods stated in first post

Power fc

cam gears

kakimoto 3 and abit inch exhaust from dumps back

high flow metal cat

stock everything else

Splitfire coil packs

Edited by levinboy
Thats all that matters mate, Dyno numbers are just numbers, Ramp rates, incorrect intake temps ect all make a difference, If you really want go and find a place that will give a better number....but it wont make it any faster :P

Exactly, me and a mate were stuffing around with my stock turboed R33, and made 450ish rwkws at 10psi lol

Helps when you stick the intake temp probe on the turbine housing LOL

Exactly, me and a mate were stuffing around with my stock turboed R33, and made 450ish rwkws at 10psi lol

Helps when you stick the intake temp probe on the turbine housing LOL

My old 32 made 750rwkw via a similar method lol

<cut>

Is it just the tune that sucks, should i go back to the tuner and ask questions or go to a different tuner??

<cut>

Did you use a reputable tuner? And have you discussed the tune with them?

Around 250rwkw used to be average for Racepace with similar mods to what you have, but it was +/- 10kw. Also dyno's do differ a little so you can get different power levels on different days / places :P

my car made 232kw on 0.9bar on the stock ecu with stock boost control solenoid, everything was stock besides tomei dump pipes and full exhaust

after i got it tuned with a pfc it made 366hp on 1 bar at all 4 hubs so around 260awkw? that was still with no cam gears, will get cam gears installed before the next tune

Did you use a reputable tuner? And have you discussed the tune with them?

Around 250rwkw used to be average for Racepace with similar mods to what you have, but it was +/- 10kw. Also dyno's do differ a little so you can get different power levels on different days / places :)

Used a reputable tuner here in sydney, going to geelong for 3months starting in June might go see racepace while im down there, always admired their work

as long as it feels quicker and makes more torque thats all the matters really

besides you have launch control so learn how to use that and away you go

its great beating cars when you quote less power, it means you are a better driver

ie if you can beat most cars with 200awkw GTR your a good driver :)

exactly. "Seat of the pants" dyno is the one that matters. If it feels quick and responsive, and you enjoy driving it, then that's what you paid for.

Top end power is just a number. Peak power is always very close to redline on a stock setup. How often are you there? Depending on tune, you can have a very responsive car but effectively very low peak power. An example will be my GTS-T come Friday. Currently it's making 284.9rwkw on 15psi. I have swapped the actuator, so I will be getting it retuned on 17/18psi on Friday. I have asked the tuner to go easy up the top of the rev range, and mainly tune for response and torque when the boost comes on...I told him that I don't give two shits if it makes the exact same peak power, it's all about how it feels when it comes on and sticks me to the seat

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update Issues 5 (plus #4) - 10 After making a claim about issue #4's missing part, DeAgostini Japan sent a whole new issue #4 and it arrived about 2 weeks after that. That was back in early March. It took another 4 weeks to receive issues 5 - 13 though. This update is for issues 5 - 10. Ove the 5 issues the front left suspension and most of the engine have been completed. The quality of the castings and fit of the parts is quite good, it seems better than DeAgostini's BNR34 Skyline GT-R from the Fast & Furious 2 movie, which (to me anyway) doesn't seem to have as tight tolerances or quite as accurate castings.  Each issue has a lot of info about the 1989 - 1993 Skyline range and other Nissan models from that era, but the focus is on the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo and the various racing it did in Japan, Europe (Spa 24hrs) and of course Australia. I've included some text translated with Google Lens in some photos and will add to them if there's anything worth including. 
    • If it's for a SR20, make sure it's not the American Poncams, might as well call them Poocams. Had a set in a friend's car, all scuffed up after a few track days. Like the metallurgy Tomei USA used is junk. Went back to JDM OG Tomei Poncams, no issues till now.   Tomei USA is not the real OG Tomei.   Random rant over, fk the US of A, bunch of c u n t s. 
    • Most of the industry in North America either runs on Siemens or Allen Bradley. I have two redundant S7-1500's on my desk right next to me for simulation. Siemens has been losing ground though since Stuxnet, as cybersecurity is a big thing. In my line of work that is federally regulated, you must by law have a cybersecurity management program in place and its audited and inspected every so often.  I work with Emerson PLC's daily (RX3i's) and have done large biogas/refinery projects with their DCS's. Their PLC's are somewhat OK minus the way they do PLC redundancy (You have to download on both PLC's separately every time you make a change )  As for their DCS's... you'll be limited financially first before anything else stops you. Costs are exorbiant at roughly 10x what it would cost you to do with any other system (e.g AB PAC).  1990's, those suckers are brand new haha! Kraft-Heinz (An old client when I use to work for an ESP) still runs Siemens TI505 PLC's from the mid 80's. Ohh how I don't miss working with those... you could only do a certain number of online downloads until it's "Change" buffer would be full and you would then need to go offline to do a full download. There was no warning of when this was coming up and it generally would happen when you would go in at 2am to make changes before production -_-.     
    • Unfortunately, not only is that not the case, one of the main "Selling points" of safety over comms is they clearly state in writing that there's no need to segregate safety networks from non-safety networks. It always gets intermingled with everything else on an ICS/OT network. 
×
×
  • Create New...