Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

Got something to rattle your brains here... i'll give you the back story though it may be unrelated...

on monday morning i got my air con regassed, it seemed to work fine. drove car for 10mins, stopped it for 5, got back in and drove for 15 mins to uni and everything seemed fine, air con was working.

i was at work at uni for like 5 or 6 hours.

come back to my car and it wont start, battery is half dead (lights on dash come up and it clicks). so i get it jump started from a friend. i wait there idling for a bit. it all seems fine, then the engine revs drop a bit, the hicas light comes on, then the engine dies.

i jump it again but the same happens again. i then disconnect the relay for the air con (thinking it's something to do with that)

i manage to drive it 10 mins home, but after i turn it off, i can't start it again, battery is dead.

i then get my house mates car to charge my battery for 10 mins, start mine up drive to petrol station, fill up, it starts again so i drive around for another 15 mins on roe hwy (thinking it would help charge the batt having the higher revs). i get home, park car, then this morning battery is completely dead again.

now, here is the confusing part.... i measure the current draw using a charged battery, and it says ~3.5-4A and nothing is on, keys aren't even in the IGN barrel. so i start removing fuses to try and track what is eating the power... i have now removed every fuse i can find (engine bay, driver's kick panel, near battery in boot) and it's still drawing ~3.5-4A!!!!

so has anyone every heard of something like this? or know anything else i can check?

(for reference, car is a 93 R33 4 door with RB25DET, pretty much no mods (no fancy alarm or other circuits wired in)).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341070-unknown-current-draw/
Share on other sites

fog lamps are turned off (and fuse is pulled)

air con is disabled (no fuse or relay) as it was leaking anyways.

i was thinking aircon clutch, but yeah, i don't hear it.

thanks for the ideas guys, but no dice :)

ok, just for reference in case anybody else ends up searching for the same problem.... because i believe i have found it!

i started unplugging/ disconnecting things that connect to the main loom and use +ive... disconnected the starter motor, but that changed nothing.

but then as i took off the alternator, i saw sparks... once fully disconnected, current draw was 0.

so apparently my alternator is screwed... but i;ve not seen one die like this before. i will try taking it apart later and if i find more info i will post it here for future reference to others.

i was thinking aircon clutch, but yeah, i don't hear it.

Not hearing it is and indication it might be the problem, as it might mean its always on... try disconnecting it to see if the load disappears. Finding where to disconnect it might be tricky, you'll need to follow the wires. IIRC there's a plug but on mine it was near impossible to disconnect.

well, i was plugging and unplugging the relay for the clutch... so it should have been clicking on and off... or when i was connecting and disconnecting the battery. with the engine off it's pretty easy to hear anyways.

but yes, the plug for it is on top of the compressor, so you need to reach under the power steering pump and fumble blindly for a bit :thumbsup:

either way, going to source a working alternator and go from there.

if the larger white wire in the alternator plug has ignition supply then the alternator will be excited. pull the small plug off and see if the current draw drops. if not then must be alternator but if it drops then there must be a ignition relay or something stuck and sending power there with key off

right... well i noticed the spark from the lead which is bolted near the back, which i believe is output (ie, to the battery).

not sure about the alternator having power from somewhere else and being excited... i pulled out every fuse and relay in that car... ones in the boot, ones behind the kick panel and ones in the engine bay. i also undid all the plugs near the fuses in the boot (just in case) so the only place getting power was that connection point near the relays in the engine bay... so unless there is some other hidden relay somewhere else in the car...

hopefully i can get an alternator tomorrow and confirm that it was at fault... otherwise i will end up going insane trying to track this problem down.

the large cable on the back of the alternator is for charging the battery but alternator has a small plug with 2 wires to turn alternator on/off and for warning light. i would try disconnecting plug and seeing if it stops current draw before getting another alternator. i would have thought ignition supply to alternator would have come from fuse panel but the cables are quite large so prob a relay or fusible link

replaced alternator, haven't taken the car for a run yet, but it started ok and was running fine for like 5-10mins

it was also charging the battery which is a good sign.

just to note, there was a whining kind of noise which must have been from the alternator (i thought it was air related so i didn't think much of it) which i think one of the diodes in the rectifier have died hence the drawing current as it is now short circuiting through that diode.

will update with final result soon. am still thinking that the whole aircon involvement was coincidence.

  • 4 months later...

Yep, turned out to be alternator had a dead diode which was making a constant current draw.

alternator would still charge if you gave it enough RPM interestingly enough, it just wasn't as efficient.

So, 1 new alternator later and car has been good since then (except for the battery being old and dying, but thats another story)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
×
×
  • Create New...