Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok now i have seen that this has been covered in a few threads before but the most recent one i could find was late last year. So here is what i Have, 1998 R34 GT-t with a RB25DET Neo motor

What i am after, A forward facing Inlet manifold in similar styling to a GT-R version. Reason being that i refuse to run the intercooler piping back across the engine into the standard inlet plenum. (FYI every 90 degree bend is worth at least 1.3m of piping and a pressure drop of about .5psi on average. if you have seen the garret calculation that works out to be a fair bit of power over all) I am not so worried about the flow rates of the manifold/runners as long as it is as good as the stock one (if not better)

OK so i have heard of a lot of people cutting the runners and just welding on a GT-R plenum, i am trying to steer clear of that option if i can.I also know someone that can fabricate a complete manifold if i want so that is also a option. but i would prefer it to be a more straight forward thing if i can.

I have Seen on Ebay a inlet from PnT performance in the style that i am after.

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/R34-skyline-RB25DET...=item27b2ae94d6

The questions i have are.

1. Has anyone used one of these?

2. If so has there been any fitting dramas at all. like having to alter where the battery sits? (i don't mind having to re-route hoses or wiring)

3. has there been any failure's? what was the cause?

if i have missed anything that you wanna know (like my plans for the car or exactly what i am chasing) please let me know.

Edited by neofenrir34
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341132-inlet-manifolds/
Share on other sites

By your calculations simply fitting a forward facing plenum to a stock car will give you more power, which is far from the case.

Exactly :thumbsup:

And each 90 degree is hardly worth .5 of a PSI. By that most cars would be dropping what, 2-3psi?

Go and test it, the drop 9 outta 10 times (from turbo to throttle body) is caused by cheap cooler cores... Not the bends.

Issue with the NEO, there aren't a lot of options.

The best obviously is get a plate made and use a GTR item.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341132-inlet-manifolds/#findComment-5505827
Share on other sites

IMO in order to gain a benefit out of these short runner intake manifolds you will need to spin more rpm.

Generalising.....if you are going to drive it in the stock rpm band then stick to the stock manifold for the best overall power/torque curve.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341132-inlet-manifolds/#findComment-5506031
Share on other sites

I have Greddy plenum fitted on my DET Neo, the one intended for R33 engine. I don't have pre-installation dyno graph, but subjectively speaking it felt less torquey at low revs up to maybe 2500 or so. I'm not sure about this 0.5psi loss per 90 turn, I guess it depends on pipe diameter, mass flow rate, flow speed, etc.

Edited by Legionnaire
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341132-inlet-manifolds/#findComment-5506042
Share on other sites

I just finished installing a GReddy front facing plenum on a stock RB25DET. Driving the car before and after I didn't notice much loss down low but up high got a huge gain. Will be interesting to know how the car will be once tuned. All this in an S13. :P I'll post some pics tonight.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341132-inlet-manifolds/#findComment-5506309
Share on other sites

Exactly :D

And each 90 degree is hardly worth .5 of a PSI. By that most cars would be dropping what, 2-3psi?

Go and test it, the drop 9 outta 10 times (from turbo to throttle body) is caused by cheap cooler cores... Not the bends.

Issue with the NEO, there aren't a lot of options.

The best obviously is get a plate made and use a GTR item.

I never said anything about gaining more power just by putting a forward facing inlet. My main point is gaining over all throttle response (and please don't start talking about dyno charts and torque curves, they tell nothing about the efficiency of the intake and turbo systems, only power levels unless you have full data logging and do a variety of tests)

You would be surprised about how much pressure is lost from the turbo to the inlet (2psi quite a normal loss, is some cases 4psi is not unheard of). The bends reduce response of the engine and at higher boost levels cause bigger problems.

I am not so worried about torque levels a low rpm, in most cases with correct tuning and supporting mods this can be adjusted to minimize losses in that area. I am well aware of the effects of inlet runner lengths (venturi effects) and how these things effect the engine power and torque curves

My main question is has any one fitted One of these PnT performance "JUN" style ebay inlet manifolds and had success?

That is what i am asking.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341132-inlet-manifolds/#findComment-5507025
Share on other sites

I was under the impression every 90 was worth about 1psi. Only way to tell for sure is to monitor pressure at turbo outlet and then at the manifold to see overall drop and work it out from there.

Well it can vary depending on the system but .5 is conservative average.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341132-inlet-manifolds/#findComment-5507033
Share on other sites

I just finished installing a GReddy front facing plenum on a stock RB25DET. Driving the car before and after I didn't notice much loss down low but up high got a huge gain. Will be interesting to know how the car will be once tuned. All this in an S13. :D I'll post some pics tonight.

thanks i would be interested to know how this works out after a good tune

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341132-inlet-manifolds/#findComment-5507037
Share on other sites

Well it can vary depending on the system but .5 is conservative average.

Based on what testing?

We are telling you its not that much. I've not seen that on my own car with a factory return style intake.

I never said anything about gaining more power just by putting a forward facing inlet.

well by losing "0.5psi" you are actually losing power, as its a restriction.

So you did... You also then went on to say:

if you have seen the garret calculation that works out to be a fair bit of power over all)

So whether you "were" or not, fact is you did and hence we are all pulling you up on it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341132-inlet-manifolds/#findComment-5507385
Share on other sites

Based on what testing?

We are telling you its not that much. I've not seen that on my own car with a factory return style intake.

well by losing "0.5psi" you are actually losing power, as its a restriction.

So you did... You also then went on to say:

So whether you "were" or not, fact is you did and hence we are all pulling you up on it.

OK yeah i can see how it reads like that, i am sorry for that. It is not how i meant it to read.

My statement about Garrets calculations was in regards to it being possible power that could be gained, at the levels i am talking about it isn't really practical even worrying about.

The gains i am chasing are more on the side of increased efficiency within the entire turbo and intake system resulting in increase response, it is not like i am chasing that small amount of extra psi, after all that 1psi extra is more then a acceptable loss

All systems have restrictions and it is true that the main cause is the cooler core itself but it can also result from piping.

Again i apologize for the ill worded posts

Although i do believe we have been caught up in a off topic discussion.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341132-inlet-manifolds/#findComment-5507496
Share on other sites

I have a RIPS plenum and have been told the plenum chamber near cylinder 6 is rather small as it tapers quite a bit, best plenum from what Ive been told by a few people now is the hypertune one...

Yes hypertune have awesome inlet manifolds the R&D put into them is unbelievable. they can custom make one with no problems there, but the cost would be most likely be more then i am looking to spend, plus they like to have the car to do it. It is a shame really.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341132-inlet-manifolds/#findComment-5507569
Share on other sites

I dont think the intake plenum is a thing you really want to skimp out on...

spend the money on a good one straight up, it will just be a hassle or tuning issue otherwise...

i have been thinking about it that way also. That is one of the reasons for topic

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341132-inlet-manifolds/#findComment-5508567
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have engineer in my job title One of or motto's though is "we make and we break"
    • This is actually 2 whole different trains of thought that need to be addressed separately. No, as Matt says above, "Engineer" is not a directly protected title. A lot of guys who just do mechanical design via CAD, with or without even some sort of associate diploma in engineering, often have the job title of "Design Engineer". A train driver can probably still describe themselves as an engineer. But, to usefully get employment with anyone as a proper engineer, you're going to have to have at least the necessary and relevant degree qualification. You're not going to get a job as an electrical engineer if you have a chem eng degree, unless you can demonstrate x number of years of working in that capacity, sufficient knowledge, etc. Having the degree is at least in indication that you've seen the relevant text books, even if you haven't read them (like pretty much the last 10 years of graduates!). To be a self employed engineer.....you could get away with quite a lot pretending that you're suitably qualified, without actually being a proper engineer. But, you will find yourself unable to work for a large section of the client space because a lot demand CVs and capability statements when considering contracting for any engineering work these days. Insurances too. If you're not a proper engineer, it will be much harder to obtain proper PI insurance. Insurance companies have gotten hip to that. The "Professional Engineer" thing is a thing in Australia. If you have the right qualifications and experience you can apply to the relevant engineering top level body (mostly Engineers Australia, the less said about whom, the better), to be assessed and approved as a Chartered Professional Engineer, CPE. There are high bars to get over and a requirement for CPD to maintain it. The RPEQ thing is similar-ish, in that you have to demonstrate and maintain, but the bars are a little lower. It is required to be RPEQ in order to sign off as an engineer on any engineering design in Queensland. The other states haven't fully followed suit yet. There's "engineering" and there's "engineering". Being an engineer that signs off on timber (or even steel) frames for housing projects, council creek crossing bridges, etc, is a flavour of civil engineering that barely warrants the name, description and degree. That would be soul crushing work anyway. Being an automotive engineer working in the space where you have to sign off on modifications to cars and trucks would also be similarly soul crushing. At least partly because of the level of clientelle, their expecations, depths of bank balance, etc. And that brings us to your second question. No, we do not have professional engineers "do vehicle inspections". Well, not the regular roadworthies, etc etc. That's done by mechanics. There might be some vehicle standards engineers at the various state govco inspection stations where cars go to get defects cleared and so on, but that's because they (the cars) are there specifically for defect inspection and clearance and so the stakes are a little higher than on an annual lights and brakes working check. But, if you modify a vehicle in Australia, you have to get it engineered. A suitably qualified (and effectively licensed, which I will get back to) automotive engineer will have to go over the application, advise on what would be required to make the mods legal, supervise some parts of the work, inspect and test the results, and sign off. The "licensed" aspect comes from there being a list of approved engineers to do these things in each state. They have to jump through hoops set up by the govco vehicle standards divisions that mean only the suitably qualified can offer to and approve such mods.
    • It's got a problem Prank... It looks like both washer spray caps have fallen off this car... 😛
    • Meh, it's only got to last another 10 years or so until you'll be forbidden to drive it. Keep it dry and forget about it.
    • The title of Engineer is not protected. However different states have different rules about what an Engineer requires to operate. Engineering for a motor vehicle modification is very different to engineering for a bridge, electronics, etc, including what that engineer needs as certifications.   In Canberra, "Engineer" is the loosest category with basically nothing stopping you calling yourself and engineer and designing a bridge or building. From what I've reviewed, QLD has the strictest requirements through RPEIQ.
×
×
  • Create New...