Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As long as there is plenty of turbo flow and everything else to back it up, more than happy to consider it. If you like, pm me the details of the engine mod's and we can go from there.

I want to get results at different boost levels to see the overall impact. I also have an egt kit I would like to install to get even more data to back things up one way or another.

Lol funny you should mention that, I just pulled one apart an hour ago. First time I noticed them too. I figured much the same; an attempt to direct air towards the runners rather then letting it all gush straight to number 6. I would have thought they would need to be abit longer (protrude in more) to have enough of a difference.

exactly the reason why they have done it. there are some cad simulation programs results which show this would be beneficial.

as for all the air being directed to no6....this is not necessarily true considering cylinders fire at different times and the air is used only when valves are open. you will find that the rear cylinders, 5 & 6, of the gtr plenum actually flows less than the 1 & 2.

Oh good. The reason why i asked is becasue sometimes people just ask it because they think its fancy and have read it somewhere else....and I also wanted to see who could do it for me so I could compare it to flowbench figures...unfortunately your in QLD.

So that would answer your questions, no I don't but would like to find somene local who could do it for me and show me how its done...so if there is anyone out there who can, please pm me.

Interesting about the flow. I thought the major belief was that 5 and 6 flowed abit more (or atleast received air first and more of it) and so always ran a fraction leaner as a result, hence why alot of tuning shops richen 6 up by 1.5% and 5 by 1% or something like that.

Funnily enough I thought all forward facing plenums were susceptible to that problem by that same reasoning.

Did you test this by egts on each exhaust runner with matched injectors? or some kind of flow test on the manifold itself?

that is far from the truth!!!! another one of those internet created misconceptions....and there are plenty more out there

this was tested on a flow bench....EGT testing is coming with the test car

as for rb20 info, watch this space when i get some time after the rb25 testing

i actually need someone to draw them up for me to do the cfd

from reports cfd results are actually very similar to flow test results when the same environment is used, meaning real world vs what is simulated

Edited by ISL33P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi again all, I’ve tried doing some searching on the topic but couldn’t find the answer I’m looking for.   I deleted my clutch booster because it had an air leak and was squealing like a hog, and now my clutch has very poor pedal feel and the friction zone is way too small, so I believe I need a bigger diameter clutch master cylinder to compensate for not using the booster. I found a Wilwood option that’s 3/4” for a good price and will fit my 3AN clutch line, but all the firewall adapters I see online such as RB factory or Chase Bays are listed as RWD only (GTST/GTS). Link below. https://rbfactory.shop/products/nissan-to-wilwood-girling-clutch-master-cylinder-adapter My question is if these adapters will also fit a GTR, and if anyone has experience using a 3/4” CMC without the booster, my clutch is a Nismo coppermix twin plate.   Thanks, always appreciate the advice!
    • Catching up on a post, I've replaced the external shark fin with a small 4g antenna (no further drilling, just a 1mm embiggening of the existing hole, and run that to where the dual battery models have the battery in the left rear guard.  No idea what the factory antenna did, but removing it had no impact on anything I use, according to the US manual the GPS antenna is in the dash and it still works fine Also ended up stealing battery power from one of the amps and ACC power from a unit nearby to add an ACC relay to power it. The mounted the booster, wifi, power socket and antenna splitter in the rear left guard out of the way, all out of site with the boot trims in
    • What drama? The only drama you're going to have is the near constant work to maintain all those sphericals. I only have sphericals in my front caster rods and front upper CAs (because both of these are near compulsory in an R32). I have had the front arms out of my car 34 times already this month, and if the new replacements arrive today, I will have them out and apart again tomorrow. Chasing clicking and clunking that comes from sphericals being a.....poor choice for a road car. Moisture and dirt are not their friends. I have been contemplating a change to my rear subframe that would require me to use sphericals in my lower CAs. And.....I don't want to have them that close to the road.
    • Did you need anything else you've already done? If you had it before... and liked the changes after, then supposedly it'd be more of the same. The idea about most suspension arms is to tune geometry that the OEM arms max out at/can't handle because they weren't designed to have the car setup in such a way that 'looks good'.
    • I have replaced everything on my r34 including suspension to Miester R, all rear subframe bushes to poly, all arms to metal adjustable and same in front.   only thing I haven't touched is the front lower control arm. Should I? what improvement can i expect ? I mean the one on the link below?   Car drives perfectly, it is just me thinking everything is either puly bush or hard bearing type so should also do lower control arm front but do I really need it ? https://www.japspeed.co.uk/product/suspension/adjustable-arms/nissan-200sx-s13-s14-s15-skyline-r32-r33-r34-adjustable-suspension-front-lower-control-arms/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiAo5u6BhDJARIsAAVoDWs5V_PauQPf0kx3zFCaA4tOC9Q7JSIsfJWma_jAPN2f1sJA686djOwaAidgEALw_wcB
×
×
  • Create New...