Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

R32/300ZX - both old and aged examples

IMO neither will be better as it sounds like you don't wanna spend too much coin...

Which means you wont be spending over 20k - as IMO, to get a DECENT R32 GTR that is clean on bodywork (so a respray), has had some maint done on it (undercarriage bushes, mounts etc) then well...

You'll just be buying a clapped out one. 300ZX's are half the price of a decent R32 GTR

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341222-300zx-or-r32gtr/#findComment-5507395
Share on other sites

Well, unanimous verdict to the GTR. 300zx just popped into my head whilst i was looking at GTR's and i'd always liked the look of them and thought i may as well consider it.

Thanks for your help.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341222-300zx-or-r32gtr/#findComment-5511124
Share on other sites

Well, unanimous verdict to the GTR. 300zx just popped into my head whilst i was looking at GTR's and i'd always liked the look of them and thought i may as well consider it.

Thanks for your help.

there you go, you already knew the answer in your head. it was always going to be GTR :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341222-300zx-or-r32gtr/#findComment-5511233
Share on other sites

Was a sporting event, guy with a 300zx (who was driving it quite well actually, they can are pretty decent cars), had some coolant leaking out the front

"oh well, its leaking from somewhere in there".

Multiple bits to come off just to check out the hoses

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341222-300zx-or-r32gtr/#findComment-5511343
Share on other sites

Well, unanimous verdict to the GTR. 300zx just popped into my head whilst i was looking at GTR's and i'd always liked the look of them and thought i may as well consider it.

Thanks for your help.

They're a really nice car, yes I'm biased, but if your interested do some research on aus300zx.com

As long as the cars well maintained you wont have any dramas with overheating or anything like that & there's a few zed specialist mechanics in pretty much every state that do great work.

oh & 7 years ownership = no engine out

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/341222-300zx-or-r32gtr/#findComment-5511568
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...