Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's actually not bad for a 2+2 S30... although that's probably the money shot. Wonder what it looks like from the back. S30 fastback FTW. I'd take one of those over a GTR anyday.

Tim, the OP's got $20K to burn, so you're pretty much guaranteed he's gonna end up with a 20 year old car that came in under the 15 year rule that was once owned by a 17 year old.

How much $ would you spend for a good r32?

How much $ would you spend for a good r32?

personally, a nice mint condition 92-94 R32 GTR (preferably a V Spec or V Spec II.... stay clear of N1's) freshly imported under SEVS and budget about 23k for the car only (not including rego, insurance etc). Being a SEVS import you'll have the ease of mind that it's been freshly complied and inspected and have the option of getting up to 3 years warranty on it (using a 3rd party, at extra cost).

yeah your easily looking at >20k absolute minimum for a decent one landed in aus, then you got every other expense on top

id import one as clean stock ones are becoming a rarity to find locally in aus

^also jamie, that is probs the mintest 2+2's iv seen

Someone from uni bought a cheap 300zx for $3.5k, had electrical wiring issue, was fixed & it ran fine after that.

& no engine out was required, everything else out instead...

No engine out? = Engine out!

it's in a permanent state of engine out lol.

nissan should supply 300zx's from factory with the engine out to save people the time fucking around taking it out on delivery to change the oil filter.

No engine out? = Engine out!

the alternative to engine out is to strip the car to a bare shell leaving only the engine in. it sounds like this guy took that option without realising it was the worst of the 2 options, as you are often then still required to remove the engine a few times to take out multiple components in the process

260z007.jpg

Buy this Zed instead!

:thumbsup:

I use to own that zed when it was stock as a rock. I sold it on ebay 7 or so years ago and shiped it to Europe. The only reason i sold it was to buy an r32. that was a silly move. It didnt take long for me to get bored of the r32 and sell it to buy a 240z. Now i have the best of both worlds. A 240z with an rb20det

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...