Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nah no realy benefit, remote turbo set-ups are usually done due to spacing constraints.

Ends up being pretty laggy, but makes similar powar. Also they dont usually need intercoolers cos the piping is soo long, the air looses all its heat on the way back to the motor.

That is a f**king sick car. Sounds porn, looks amazing.

:drool:

Nah no realy benefit, remote turbo set-ups are usually done due to spacing constraints.

Ends up being pretty laggy, but makes similar powar. Also they dont usually need intercoolers cos the piping is soo long, the air looses all its heat on the way back to the motor.

That is a f**king sick car. Sounds porn, looks amazing.

:drool:

Exactly what I was thinking.

The turbo housing should also act as an intercooler as the outside air is blowing onto it.

Instant cooling...

+ this setup seems quite popular in the USA.

Im still not a believer of such setups.

One dude in FI has something similar ATM ("STS" thread)... But with ALL that extra pipe work, there MUST be some delay & lag on that set-up over conventional stuff.

Also add in the extra weight, weight balance all that pipe would come into etc etc.

I think the fact they all usually do it with resonable cube V8's kinda negates it a bit - but you can hear from the video how long the turbos take to get on song

Hence, i ain't convinced.

Very sexy car though.

Im still not a believer of such setups.

One dude in FI has something similar ATM ("STS" thread)... But with ALL that extra pipe work, there MUST be some delay & lag on that set-up over conventional stuff.

Also add in the extra weight, weight balance all that pipe would come into etc etc.

I think the fact they all usually do it with resonable cube V8's kinda negates it a bit - but you can hear from the video how long the turbos take to get on song

Hence, i ain't convinced.

Very sexy car though.

Yeah not exactly responsive, especially for such small turbos.

doesn't matter on that setup though as he's got high comp Lexus V8 power... the turbos would just give more torque/power and fatten out the midrange and top end... he's only running 5psi if I heard correctly

sweet car... pity about the gearbox, sounds slushy changing gears... a manual would be so nice

doesn't matter on that setup though as he's got high comp Lexus V8 power... the turbos would just give more torque/power and fatten out the midrange and top end... he's only running 5psi if I heard correctly

sweet car... pity about the gearbox, sounds slushy changing gears... a manual would be so nice

Yeah i agree with that, still would be much better with a "real" turbo setup though, If it were mine I would just leave it Aspirated.

V160 Conversion wouldn't be too hard they are just a Fat version of an IS250 and bell housings are avaliable to suit the UZ motor

the adgantage is that you don't have to go making up new manifolds, trying to squeeze turbos into tight engine bays with v8 motors, and on NA motors lag won't be that much of an issue. because you don't really need to run much in the way of intercoolers and the turbos aren't massive. you will have some lag though obviously.

an advantage though, epic turbo spool noise coming out the exhaust as it doesn't have to pass through any mufflers after the turbo.

the adgantage is that you don't have to go making up new manifolds, trying to squeeze turbos into tight engine bays with v8 motors, and on NA motors lag won't be that much of an issue. because you don't really need to run much in the way of intercoolers and the turbos aren't massive. you will have some lag though obviously.

an advantage though, epic turbo spool noise coming out the exhaust as it doesn't have to pass through any mufflers after the turbo.

I have been thinking about doing this to my 5ltr NC fairlane for those exact reasons.

H O M O

he def needs more shit carbon everywhere

and shoulda just bought one of these

http://www.turbowhistler.net/

sounds the same

having the turbo in the back seat is plausable . http://speedhunters.com/archive/2010/07/20...k-pink-s14.aspx

80% of the energy the turbo uses comes from exhaust heat

how hot is your manifold ? vs how hot is the exhaust gas at the tip ? you do the math

Edited by lachlanw

how does the turbo use heat? the turbo uses exhaust gas flow. sure the exhaust gas has less density when it is hotter, therefore being a larger volume, but if you take this into account with exhaust size and turbo size you could balance things out a bit. plus there is the advantge of the fact that a byproduct of the turbo is heat, which then reduces power, so having it further away reduces the power loss through hotter intake temps and restrictive intercoolers.

not goin to argue how a turbo works . go read a book instead of the internet

on another note of someone came to me and had lots of money and wanted this id be happy to do it and he is obvoiusly happy with it

there was a huge debate on this on NS a while back. short answer, no.

-increased intercooler piping thus more lag.

-increased risk of turbo damage.

-decreased life span of the turbo. whenever it rains the turbo will be sprayed with water. since the inside of the exhaust hosing will be around 900c yet the outside is being sprayed with cool water, the great temperature difference is likely to cause cracking.

-cheaper, easier and more common to do with the correct way.

Edited by Peter89

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
    • Thanks Paul I reached out to Autotainment but they no longer work on JDM cars as the guy who used to do the work moved on and is no longer doing that kind of work. I am talking with Level Up Audio though.
×
×
  • Create New...